BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/21] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:01:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926050133.2221762-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926050006.2213110-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

An object that carries a compiler-emitted exception cleanup table cannot be
linked today. The table's fields are byte offsets into a code section,
materialised by a 32-bit relocation against that section's symbol with the
offset itself as the implicit addend, and the linker rejects both halves of
that: the relocation type is not in the list it accepts, and a relocation
against an STT_SECTION symbol from a non-executable section is an outright
error.

Both spellings of that relocation have to be taken. LLVM emits
R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 for a .long against a section symbol; GNU as emits
R_BPF_64_ABS32, which is what bpf_reloc_type_lookup() maps BFD_RELOC_32 to.
They describe the same value, and the selftests are built with both
compilers.

Keying on the relocation type rather than the section name means any
non-executable section can reach the new arm, where an unconditional
refusal used to stand. That refusal was covering two things the arm now has
to do itself: a target may be SHT_NOBITS, which extend_sec() leaves with no
raw_data, and r_offset is alignment-checked only where the section holds
instructions. The arm rejects both, and bounds the offset against the
section size before writing through it.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index 53f64a1a1f25..26a5e53df6f0 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,8 @@ static int linker_sanity_check_elf_relos(struct src_obj *obj, struct src_sec *se
 		size_t sym_type = ELF64_R_TYPE(relo->r_info);
 
 		if (sym_type != R_BPF_64_64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_32 &&
-		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32) {
+		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32 &&
+		    sym_type != R_BPF_64_NODYLD32) {
 			pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu has unexpected type %zu in %s\n",
 				i, sec->sec_idx, sym_type, obj->filename);
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -2258,6 +2259,7 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
 			if (ELF64_ST_TYPE(src_sym->st_info) == STT_SECTION) {
 				struct src_sec *sec = &obj->secs[src_sym->st_shndx];
 				struct bpf_insn *insn;
+				__u32 *val;
 
 				if (src_linked_sec->shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR) {
 					/* calls to the very first static function inside
@@ -2292,6 +2294,38 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
 					if (linker->swapped_endian)
 						off = bswap_64(off);
 					memcpy(ptr, &off, sizeof(off));
+				} else if (sym_type == R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 ||
+					   sym_type == R_BPF_64_ABS32) {
+					/*
+					 * A byte offset into a code section,
+					 * stored in place. LLVM spells this
+					 * relocation NODYLD32 and GNU as
+					 * spells it ABS32; being bytes, the
+					 * section's new start goes in as it
+					 * is, not scaled the way a call's
+					 * instruction index is above.
+					 *
+					 * r_offset is checked only for an
+					 * executable section, and SHT_NOBITS
+					 * has no raw_data, so bound it here --
+					 * subtracting, so it cannot wrap.
+					 */
+					if (!dst_linked_sec->raw_data ||
+					    dst_linked_sec->sec_sz < (int)sizeof(*val) ||
+					    dst_rel->r_offset % sizeof(*val) ||
+					    dst_rel->r_offset >
+					    (size_t)dst_linked_sec->sec_sz - sizeof(*val)) {
+						pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu points outside the data of section '%s' in %s\n",
+							j, src_sec->sec_idx,
+							dst_linked_sec->sec_name,
+							obj->filename);
+						return -EINVAL;
+					}
+					val = dst_linked_sec->raw_data + dst_rel->r_offset;
+					if (linker->swapped_endian)
+						*val = bswap_32(bswap_32(*val) + sec->dst_off);
+					else
+						*val += sec->dst_off;
 				} else {
 					pr_warn("relocation against STT_SECTION in non-exec section is not supported!\n");
 					return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-26  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  5:00 [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/21] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/21] bpf: Pack bpf_insn_aux_data flags into bit fields Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/21] bpf: Accept the compiler's exception cleanup table at program load Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/21] bpf: Add the bpf_unwind() and bpf_unwind_resume() kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/21] bpf: Add lookups for exception cleanup resumes and landing pads Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/21] bpf: Prepare for an exception cleanup table before the CFG walk Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 23:54     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:01     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/21] bpf: Make exception landing pads reachable in the CFG Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  0:02     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:12     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/21] bpf: Resume a covered call at its landing pad Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26  8:21     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-27  0:04       ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27  0:41     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:17     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/21] bpf: Refuse a landing pad that does not resume Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  3:06     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  0:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/21] bpf: Refuse a private stack for a program with an exception cleanup table Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/21] bpf: Dispatch cleanup pads by rewriting return addresses Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  1:08     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/21] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  4:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:10     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/21] bpf, arm64: " Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/21] libbpf: Resolve the compiler's _Unwind_Resume to the kernel's kfunc Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/21] libbpf: Add cleanup_info to bpf_prog_load_opts Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/21] libbpf: Collect .bpf_cleanup records and pass them to the kernel Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:39   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:28     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/21] libbpf: Carry the exception cleanup table through the light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/21] selftests/bpf: Add an end-to-end .bpf_cleanup exception test Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 19/21] selftests/bpf: Add __set_global() and __ret_global() test tags Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-27  4:58     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:36     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 20/21] selftests/bpf: Cover the exception cleanup shapes the chain does not reach Yonghong Song
2026-09-27 20:40   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-28  3:49     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-26  5:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 21/21] selftests/bpf: Load an exception cleanup program from a light skeleton Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260926050133.2221762-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox