From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
tushar.vyavahare@intel.com, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
bjorn@kernel.org,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/13] selftests: xsk: factor endpoint work out of pthread wrappers
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:21:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001202124.692591-2-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001202124.692591-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Move TX execution, RX setup and RX validation into synchronous helpers
and leave the pthread entry points as thin wrappers, so the same code
can later run without a thread per endpoint. Barrier, pacing and test
behavior are unchanged, but plan is to step away from thread-based
model in favor of separate process approach, hence this preparation.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 98 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
index 4549358cc8c2..2a1362874092 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
@@ -1623,40 +1623,31 @@ static int thread_common_ops(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject)
return 0;
}
-void *worker_testapp_validate_tx(void *arg)
+static int testapp_validate_tx_endpoint(struct test_spec *test,
+ struct ifobject *ifobject)
{
- struct test_spec *test = (struct test_spec *)arg;
- struct ifobject *ifobject = test->ifobj_tx;
int err;
if (test->current_step == 1) {
- if (!ifobject->shared_umem) {
- if (thread_common_ops(test, ifobject)) {
- test->fail = true;
- pthread_exit(NULL);
- }
- } else {
- if (thread_common_ops_tx(test, ifobject)) {
- test->fail = true;
- pthread_exit(NULL);
- }
- }
+ if (!ifobject->shared_umem)
+ err = thread_common_ops(test, ifobject);
+ else
+ err = thread_common_ops_tx(test, ifobject);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
}
err = send_pkts(test, ifobject);
if (!err && ifobject->validation_func)
err = ifobject->validation_func(ifobject);
- if (err)
- test->fail = true;
- pthread_exit(NULL);
+ return err;
}
-void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
+static int testapp_prepare_rx_endpoint(struct test_spec *test,
+ struct ifobject *ifobject)
{
- struct test_spec *test = (struct test_spec *)arg;
- struct ifobject *ifobject = test->ifobj_rx;
int err;
if (test->current_step == 1) {
@@ -1669,35 +1660,64 @@ void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
strerror(-err));
}
- if (test->use_barrier)
- pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
+ return err;
+}
- /* We leave only now in case of error to avoid getting stuck in the barrier */
- if (err) {
- test->fail = true;
- pthread_exit(NULL);
- }
+static int testapp_validate_rx_endpoint(struct test_spec *test,
+ struct ifobject *ifobject)
+{
+ bool supported;
+ int err;
err = receive_pkts(test);
if (!err && ifobject->validation_func)
err = ifobject->validation_func(ifobject);
+ if (!err)
+ return TEST_PASS;
- if (err) {
- if (!test->adjust_tail) {
- test->fail = true;
- } else {
- bool supported;
+ if (!test->adjust_tail)
+ return err;
- if (is_adjust_tail_supported(ifobject->xdp_progs, &supported))
- test->fail = true;
- else if (!supported)
- test->adjust_tail_support = false;
- else
- test->fail = true;
- }
+ if (is_adjust_tail_supported(ifobject->xdp_progs, &supported))
+ return TEST_FAILURE;
+ if (!supported) {
+ test->adjust_tail_support = false;
+ return TEST_PASS;
}
+ return err;
+}
+
+void *worker_testapp_validate_tx(void *arg)
+{
+ struct test_spec *test = (struct test_spec *)arg;
+ int err;
+
+ err = testapp_validate_tx_endpoint(test, test->ifobj_tx);
+ if (err)
+ test->fail = true;
+
+ pthread_exit(NULL);
+}
+
+void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
+{
+ struct test_spec *test = (struct test_spec *)arg;
+ struct ifobject *ifobject = test->ifobj_rx;
+ int err;
+
+ err = testapp_prepare_rx_endpoint(test, ifobject);
+
+ if (test->use_barrier)
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&barr);
+
+ /* We leave only now in case of error to avoid getting stuck in the barrier */
+ if (!err)
+ err = testapp_validate_rx_endpoint(test, ifobject);
+ if (err)
+ test->fail = true;
+
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 20:21 [PATCH net-next 00/13] selftests: net: migrate AF_XDP test suite over to net Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] selftests: xsk: drop the single-interface loopback mode Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] selftests/bpf: drop the test_progs AF_XDP wrapper Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] selftests: net: add a generic rule for BPF skeletons Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-03 1:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] selftests: xsk: move the AF_XDP test suite to selftests/net Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] selftests: xsk: collect interface capabilities in struct xsk_caps Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] selftests: xsk: split xskxceiver main() into setup, run and cleanup Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] selftests: xsk: run one test case per xskxceiver invocation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] selftests: xsk: run the RX and TX endpoints in separate processes Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-02 18:07 ` Vyavahare, Tushar
2026-10-03 1:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] selftests: xsk: add a hardware mode to xskxceiver Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-03 1:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] selftests: xsk: share test case definitions with hardware runner Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] selftests: drv-net: test AF_XDP zero-copy with an SKB peer Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-01 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] selftests: xsk: document generic and hardware endpoint runs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-05 18:06 ` [PATCH net-next 00/13] selftests: net: migrate AF_XDP test suite over to net Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 17:42 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-06 22:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 12:22 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-07 17:26 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001202124.692591-2-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox