From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v10 20/24] libbpf: Let the static linker carry .bpf_cleanup relocations
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 21:16:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009041630.36495-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009041447.17092-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Each field of a .bpf_cleanup record is a byte offset into a code
section: a 32-bit relocation against that section's symbol, with the
offset as the implicit addend. The linker refuses it: it does not know
LLVM's R_BPF_64_NODYLD32, and from a non-executable section it takes a
relocation against a section symbol only as a 64-bit pointer to code.
Take it in both spellings, R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 from LLVM and
R_BPF_64_ABS32 from GNU as, adding the code section's new start to the
stored byte offset. Since any non-executable section can now reach that
path, it checks itself what the old refusal covered: that the target has
data, and that r_offset is aligned and in bounds.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
index f3f71c452f00..c607f51e3cb4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/linker.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,8 @@ static int linker_sanity_check_elf_relos(struct src_obj *obj, struct src_sec *se
size_t sym_type = ELF64_R_TYPE(relo->r_info);
if (sym_type != R_BPF_64_64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_32 &&
- sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32) {
+ sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS64 && sym_type != R_BPF_64_ABS32 &&
+ sym_type != R_BPF_64_NODYLD32) {
pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu has unexpected type %zu in %s\n",
i, sec->sec_idx, sym_type, obj->filename);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2263,6 +2264,7 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
if (ELF64_ST_TYPE(src_sym->st_info) == STT_SECTION) {
struct src_sec *sec = &obj->secs[src_sym->st_shndx];
struct bpf_insn *insn;
+ __u32 *val;
if (src_linked_sec->shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR) {
/* calls to the very first static function inside
@@ -2297,6 +2299,39 @@ static int linker_append_elf_relos(struct bpf_linker *linker, struct src_obj *ob
if (linker->swapped_endian)
off = bswap_64(off);
memcpy(ptr, &off, sizeof(off));
+ } else if ((sym_type == R_BPF_64_NODYLD32 ||
+ sym_type == R_BPF_64_ABS32) &&
+ (sec->shdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR)) {
+ /*
+ * A byte offset into a code section,
+ * stored in place. LLVM spells this
+ * relocation NODYLD32 and GNU as
+ * spells it ABS32; being bytes, the
+ * section's new start goes in as it
+ * is, not scaled the way a call's
+ * instruction index is above.
+ *
+ * r_offset is checked only for an
+ * executable section, and SHT_NOBITS
+ * has no raw_data, so bound it here --
+ * subtracting, so it cannot wrap.
+ */
+ if (!dst_linked_sec->raw_data ||
+ dst_linked_sec->sec_sz < (int)sizeof(*val) ||
+ dst_rel->r_offset % sizeof(*val) ||
+ dst_rel->r_offset >
+ (size_t)dst_linked_sec->sec_sz - sizeof(*val)) {
+ pr_warn("ELF relo #%d in section #%zu points outside the data of section '%s' in %s\n",
+ j, src_sec->sec_idx,
+ dst_linked_sec->sec_name,
+ obj->filename);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ val = dst_linked_sec->raw_data + dst_rel->r_offset;
+ if (linker->swapped_endian)
+ *val = bswap_32(bswap_32(*val) + sec->dst_off);
+ else
+ *val += sec->dst_off;
} else {
pr_warn("relocation against STT_SECTION in non-exec section is not supported!\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 4:14 [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/24] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 01/24] bpf: Pack bpf_insn_aux_data flags into bit fields Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 02/24] bpf: Accept the compiler's exception cleanup table at program load Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 03/24] bpf: Add the bpf_unwind() and bpf_unwind_resume() kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 04/24] bpf: Keep a call site's landing pad in insn_aux_data, add lookups Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:10 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 05/24] bpf: Mark covered call sites and check a program can take a table Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:13 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 06/24] bpf: Make exception landing pads reachable in the CFG Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 07/24] bpf: Verify an unwind through landing pads and epilogues Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:24 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 5:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-09 15:25 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 08/24] bpf: Refuse a callback that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 09/24] bpf: Refuse a landing pad that does not resume Yonghong Song
2026-10-10 15:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-11 18:26 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/24] bpf: Do not use a private stack for a program that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 15:38 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 11/24] bpf: Prepare JITed programs for dispatching cleanup pads Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 16:12 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 5:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-09 16:39 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 12/24] bpf: Dispatch cleanup pads by rewriting return addresses Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 13/24] bpf: Refuse a trampoline that calls a subprog that can unwind Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 14/24] bpf, x86: Dispatch exception cleanup pads at run time Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 16:51 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 15/24] bpf, arm64: " Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 16:55 ` Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 16/24] libbpf: Resolve the compiler's _Unwind_Resume to the kernel's kfunc Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 17/24] libbpf: Add cleanup_info to bpf_prog_load_opts Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 18/24] libbpf: Collect .bpf_cleanup records and pass them to the kernel Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 19/24] libbpf: Carry the exception cleanup table through the light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 21/24] selftests/bpf: Add end-to-end and negative .bpf_cleanup exception tests Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 22/24] selftests/bpf: Add __set_global() and __ret_global() test tags Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 23/24] selftests/bpf: Cover more accepted .bpf_cleanup exception shapes Yonghong Song
2026-10-09 4:16 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 24/24] selftests/bpf: Load an exception cleanup program from a light skeleton Yonghong Song
2026-10-10 15:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v10 00/24] bpf: Run exception cleanup landing pads when bpf_unwind() unwinds Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-11 17:30 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009041630.36495-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox