From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86: Fix per-CPU address resolution into an extended register
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:44:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3338fd93155ac14b3b824ce232ae7be288072608.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814203248.3714536-2-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 13:32 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> The destination of the per-CPU address MOV is encoded in ModRM.reg,
> which is extended by REX.R, but the REX prefix is built with
> add_1mod(), which sets REX.B. REX.B extends ModRM.rm and SIB.base, and
> this instruction addresses memory as disp32 with no base, so the bit
> has no effect at all and the high register bit is simply lost.
>
> Every is_ereg() destination therefore resolves to the wrong register,
> picking whichever one shares the low three bits:
>
> R5 -> RAX R7 -> RBP R8 -> RSI R9 -> RDI
>
> With BPF_REG_5, whose reg2hex is 0, the emitted
>
> 65 49 03 04 25 <off> add %gs:<off>,%rax
>
> adds the per-CPU offset to RAX rather than R8. The destination keeps
> the unadjusted address and RAX is clobbered, so the program goes on to
> dereference a pointer that was never made per-CPU:
>
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000607e386a8894
> RIP: bpf_prog_707837aafd2aa9ae_update_percpu_data+0x93/0xc9
> Call Trace:
> __bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0x2dc/0x7d0
> __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x1e9/0xc80
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> R5 is the mildest of the four, aliasing a scratch register and faulting
> at the store. R7 aliases RBP and would corrupt the frame pointer, R8
> and R9 alias the argument registers.
>
> Use add_2mod() so the register goes through REX.R, matching how
> add_2reg() places it in ModRM.reg and how emit_priv_frame_ptr()
> hardcodes 0x4c for the same instruction with R9. Encodings for the
> non-extended registers are unchanged.
>
> Problem showed up when trying to resurrect BPF_GCC CI (selftests built
> with BPF_GCC).
>
> This has gone unnoticed because clang reloads the address into R1
> before each per-CPU access, so the destination is never an extended
> register. GCC keeps several per-CPU addresses live at once, and
> test_progs-bpf_gcc panics the kernel in global_percpu_data/init, where
> the address of a .percpu variable ends up in R5.
>
> Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Please don't drop acks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 20:32 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, x86: fix per-CPU address resolution into an extended register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86: Fix " Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:44 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-14 21:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:30 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check per-CPU address resolution per register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:51 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3338fd93155ac14b3b824ce232ae7be288072608.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox