BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check per-CPU address resolution per register
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:49:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d87ed8b8140ef404436d7ddf7a4143cb07ef98cd.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814203248.3714536-3-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>

On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 13:32 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:

...

> +/*
> + * An ld_imm64 of a per-CPU map value is followed by a mov_percpu_addr that
> + * reuses the same register, so the register the address lands in decides how
> + * the JIT encodes the add. On x86 R5, R7, R8 and R9 are the extended
> + * registers, whose high bit needs REX.R because the destination sits in
> + * ModRM.reg. Check one program per extended register, since getting the
> + * prefix wrong resolves the address into whichever register shares the low
> + * three bits instead.
> + */
> +
> +SEC("raw_tp")
> +__description("per-CPU address into r5")
> +__success
> +__arch_x86_64
> +__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %r8")
> +__naked void percpu_addr_into_r5(void)
> +{
> +	asm volatile ("					\
> +	r5 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
> +	r0 = *(u32 *)(r5 + 0);				\
> +	exit;						\
> +"	:
> +	: __imm_addr(percpu_data)
> +	: __clobber_all);
> +}

Thank you for adding the tests.
Maybe save some space by just packing it as a single test?

__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %...")
__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %...")
__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %...")
__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %...")
__jited("	addq	%gs:{{.*}}, %...")

	r0 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r1 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r2 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r3 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r4 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r5 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r6 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r7 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r8 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\
	r9 = %[percpu_data] ll;				\

More compact and no need to describe in length why only R{5,7,8,9} are selected.

...

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 20:32 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, x86: fix per-CPU address resolution into an extended register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86: Fix " Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:44   ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:30     ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check per-CPU address resolution per register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:49   ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-14 21:20   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:51     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d87ed8b8140ef404436d7ddf7a4143cb07ef98cd.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox