* Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/bpf: fix alignment problem in bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
[not found] <a3552059-89d4-1866-a141-6de9454f8116@huawei.com>
@ 2022-10-28 8:12 ` zhongbaisong
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: zhongbaisong @ 2022-10-28 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: elver, glider, catalin.marinas, will, wangkefeng.wang,
linux-kernel, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, davem, catalin.marinas,
will, mark.rutland, dvyukov
Cc: netdev, bpf, kasan-dev, Linux MM
Sorry, Pls drop this.
On 2022/10/28 15:01, zhongbaisong wrote:
> We observed a crash "KFENCE: use-after-free in __skb_clone" during fuzzing.
> It's a frequent occurrance in aarch64 and the codepath is always the
> same,but cannot be reproduced in x86_64.
> The config and reproducer are in the attachement.
> Detailed crash information is as follows.
>
> -----------------------------------------
> BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __skb_clone+0x214/0x280
>
> Use-after-free read at 0xffff00022250306f (in kfence-#250):
> __skb_clone+0x214/0x280
> skb_clone+0xb4/0x180
> bpf_clone_redirect+0x60/0x190
> bpf_prog_207b739f41707f89+0x88/0xb8
> bpf_test_run+0x2dc/0x4fc
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x4ac/0x7d0
> __sys_bpf+0x700/0x1020
> __arm64_sys_bpf+0x4c/0x60
> invoke_syscall+0x64/0x190
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x88/0x200
> do_el0_svc+0x3c/0x50
> el0_svc+0x68/0xd0
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0x130
> el0t_64_sync+0x16c/0x170
>
> kfence-#250: 0xffff000222503000-0xffff00022250318e, size=399,
> cache=kmalloc-512
>
> allocated by task 2970 on cpu 0 at 65.981345s:
> bpf_test_init.isra.0+0x68/0x100
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x114/0x7d0
> __sys_bpf+0x700/0x1020
> __arm64_sys_bpf+0x4c/0x60
> invoke_syscall+0x64/0x190
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x88/0x200
> do_el0_svc+0x3c/0x50
> el0_svc+0x68/0xd0
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0x130
> el0t_64_sync+0x16c/0x170
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 2970 Comm: syz Tainted: G B W 6.1.0-rc2-next-20221025
> #140
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : __skb_clone+0x214/0x280
> lr : __skb_clone+0x208/0x280
> sp : ffff80000fc37630
> x29: ffff80000fc37630 x28: ffff80000fc37bd0 x27: ffff80000fc37720
> x26: ffff000222503000 x25: 000000000000028f x24: ffff0000d0898d5c
> x23: ffff0000d08997c0 x22: ffff0000d089977e x21: ffff00022250304f
> x20: ffff0000d0899700 x19: ffff0000d0898c80 x18: 0000000000000000
> x17: ffff800008379bbc x16: ffff800008378ee0 x15: ffff800008379bbc
> x14: ffff800008378ee0 x13: 0040004effff0008 x12: ffff6000444a060f
> x11: 1fffe000444a060e x10: ffff6000444a060e x9 : dfff800000000000
> x8 : ffff000222503072 x7 : 00009fffbbb5f9f3 x6 : 0000000000000002
> x5 : ffff00022250306f x4 : ffff6000444a060f x3 : ffff8000096fb2a8
> x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffff00022250306f x0 : 0000000000000001
> Call trace:
> __skb_clone+0x214/0x280
> skb_clone+0xb4/0x180
> bpf_clone_redirect+0x60/0x190
> bpf_prog_207b739f41707f89+0x88/0xb8
> bpf_test_run+0x2dc/0x4fc
> bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x4ac/0x7d0
> __sys_bpf+0x700/0x1020
> __arm64_sys_bpf+0x4c/0x60
> invoke_syscall+0x64/0x190
> el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x88/0x200
> do_el0_svc+0x3c/0x50
> el0_svc+0x68/0xd0
> el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0x130
> el0t_64_sync+0x16c/0x170
>
>
> From the crash info, I found the problem happend at
> atomic_inc(&(skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref)) in __skb_clone().
>
> static struct sk_buff *__skb_clone(struct sk_buff *n, struct
> sk_buff *skb)
> {
> ...
> refcount_set(&n->users, 1);
>
> > atomic_inc(&(skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref));
> skb->cloned = 1;
>
> return n;
> #undef C
> }
>
>
> when KENCE UAF happend, the address of skb_shinfo(skb) always end with
> 0xf，like
> 0xffff0002224f104f, 0xffff0002224f304f, etc.
>
> But when KFENCE is not working, the address of skb_shinfo(skb) always
> end with 0xc0, like
> 0xffff0000d7e908c0, 0xffff0000d682f4c0, ect.
>
> So, I guess the problem is related to kfence memory address alignment in
> aarch64.
> In bpf_prog_test_run_skb(), I try to let the 'size' align with
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES to fix that.
>
> After that, the KENCE user-after-free disappeared.
>
> Fixes: be3d72a2896c ("bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init")
> Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com>
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 13d578ce2a09..3414aa2930d4 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -1096,6 +1096,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
> +
> data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
> size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
> SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> .
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread