BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show
@ 2024-03-11 21:41 Yonghong Song
  2024-03-11 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2024-03-11 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team,
	Martin KaFai Lau, Quentin Monnet

Current 'bpftool link' command does not show pids, e.g.,
  $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
  ...
  4: tracing  prog 23
        prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
        target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320

Hack the following change to enable normal libbpf debug output,
  --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
  +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
  @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map, enum bpf_obj_type type)
          /* we don't want output polluted with libbpf errors if bpf_iter is not
           * supported
           */
  -       default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none);
  +       /* default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none); */
          err = pid_iter_bpf__load(skel);
  -       libbpf_set_print(default_print);
  +       /* libbpf_set_print(default_print); */

Rerun the above bpftool command:
  $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
  libbpf: prog 'iter': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
  libbpf: prog 'iter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
  0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
  ; struct task_struct *task = ctx->task; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:69
  0: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)          ; R1=ctx() R6_w=ptr_or_null_task_struct(id=1)
  ; struct file *file = ctx->file; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:68
  ...
  ; struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:103
  80: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r8 +432)       ; R3_w=scalar() R8=ptr_file()
  ; if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local, @ pid_iter.bpf.c:105
  81: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r3 +12)
  R3 invalid mem access 'scalar'
  processed 39 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 2
  -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
  libbpf: prog 'iter': failed to load: -13
  ...

The 'file->private_data' returns a 'void' type and this caused subsequent 'link->type'
(insn #81) failed in verification.

To fix the issue, do a type cast from 'void *' to 'struct bpf_link *' for file->private_data
as in this patch, and the 'bpftool link' runs successfully with 'pids'.
  $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
  ...
  4: tracing  prog 23
        prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
        target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
        pids systemd(1)

Fixes: 44ba7b30e84f ("bpftool: Use a local copy of BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT in pid_iter.bpf.c")
Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
index 26004f0c5a6a..96ffcc4f0e67 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int iter(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
 	if (obj_type == BPF_OBJ_LINK &&
 	    bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_link_type___local,
 				       BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
-		struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data;
+		struct bpf_link *link = bpf_core_cast(file->private_data, struct bpf_link);
 
 		if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local,
 						      BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show
  2024-03-11 21:41 [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show Yonghong Song
@ 2024-03-11 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2024-03-11 23:30   ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2024-03-11 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yonghong Song
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Quentin Monnet

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:41 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Current 'bpftool link' command does not show pids, e.g.,
>   $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>   ...
>   4: tracing  prog 23
>         prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>         target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>
> Hack the following change to enable normal libbpf debug output,
>   --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>   +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>   @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map, enum bpf_obj_type type)
>           /* we don't want output polluted with libbpf errors if bpf_iter is not
>            * supported
>            */
>   -       default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none);
>   +       /* default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none); */
>           err = pid_iter_bpf__load(skel);
>   -       libbpf_set_print(default_print);
>   +       /* libbpf_set_print(default_print); */
>
> Rerun the above bpftool command:
>   $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>   libbpf: prog 'iter': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
>   libbpf: prog 'iter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
>   0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
>   ; struct task_struct *task = ctx->task; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:69
>   0: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)          ; R1=ctx() R6_w=ptr_or_null_task_struct(id=1)
>   ; struct file *file = ctx->file; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:68
>   ...
>   ; struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:103
>   80: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r8 +432)       ; R3_w=scalar() R8=ptr_file()
>   ; if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local, @ pid_iter.bpf.c:105
>   81: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r3 +12)
>   R3 invalid mem access 'scalar'
>   processed 39 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 2
>   -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
>   libbpf: prog 'iter': failed to load: -13
>   ...
>
> The 'file->private_data' returns a 'void' type and this caused subsequent 'link->type'
> (insn #81) failed in verification.
>
> To fix the issue, do a type cast from 'void *' to 'struct bpf_link *' for file->private_data
> as in this patch, and the 'bpftool link' runs successfully with 'pids'.
>   $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>   ...
>   4: tracing  prog 23
>         prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>         target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>         pids systemd(1)
>
> Fixes: 44ba7b30e84f ("bpftool: Use a local copy of BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT in pid_iter.bpf.c")
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
> index 26004f0c5a6a..96ffcc4f0e67 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int iter(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
>         if (obj_type == BPF_OBJ_LINK &&
>             bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_link_type___local,
>                                        BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
> -               struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data;
> +               struct bpf_link *link = bpf_core_cast(file->private_data, struct bpf_link);

bpf_core_cast() (i.e., bpf_rdonly_cast()) is newer feature, so relying
on it in bpftool will make PID printing not work on older kernels that
generally do support iter/task_file iterators.

>
>                 if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local,

the problem is that we dropped BPF_CORE_READ() here and went with
`link->type`. Should we restore BPF_CORE_READ(link, type) here and
solve the problem, while also supporting this feature on wider set of
kernels? Quentin?

>                                                       BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
> --
> 2.43.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show
  2024-03-11 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2024-03-11 23:30   ` Yonghong Song
  2024-03-12 14:00     ` Quentin Monnet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2024-03-11 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau, Quentin Monnet


On 3/11/24 4:13 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:41 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>> Current 'bpftool link' command does not show pids, e.g.,
>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>    ...
>>    4: tracing  prog 23
>>          prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>>          target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>>
>> Hack the following change to enable normal libbpf debug output,
>>    --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>    +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>    @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map, enum bpf_obj_type type)
>>            /* we don't want output polluted with libbpf errors if bpf_iter is not
>>             * supported
>>             */
>>    -       default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none);
>>    +       /* default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none); */
>>            err = pid_iter_bpf__load(skel);
>>    -       libbpf_set_print(default_print);
>>    +       /* libbpf_set_print(default_print); */
>>
>> Rerun the above bpftool command:
>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
>>    0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
>>    ; struct task_struct *task = ctx->task; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:69
>>    0: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)          ; R1=ctx() R6_w=ptr_or_null_task_struct(id=1)
>>    ; struct file *file = ctx->file; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:68
>>    ...
>>    ; struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:103
>>    80: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r8 +432)       ; R3_w=scalar() R8=ptr_file()
>>    ; if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local, @ pid_iter.bpf.c:105
>>    81: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r3 +12)
>>    R3 invalid mem access 'scalar'
>>    processed 39 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 2
>>    -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': failed to load: -13
>>    ...
>>
>> The 'file->private_data' returns a 'void' type and this caused subsequent 'link->type'
>> (insn #81) failed in verification.
>>
>> To fix the issue, do a type cast from 'void *' to 'struct bpf_link *' for file->private_data
>> as in this patch, and the 'bpftool link' runs successfully with 'pids'.
>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>    ...
>>    4: tracing  prog 23
>>          prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>>          target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>>          pids systemd(1)
>>
>> Fixes: 44ba7b30e84f ("bpftool: Use a local copy of BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT in pid_iter.bpf.c")
>> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>> index 26004f0c5a6a..96ffcc4f0e67 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int iter(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
>>          if (obj_type == BPF_OBJ_LINK &&
>>              bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_link_type___local,
>>                                         BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
>> -               struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data;
>> +               struct bpf_link *link = bpf_core_cast(file->private_data, struct bpf_link);
> bpf_core_cast() (i.e., bpf_rdonly_cast()) is newer feature, so relying
> on it in bpftool will make PID printing not work on older kernels that
> generally do support iter/task_file iterators.
>
>>                  if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum bpf_link_type___local,
> the problem is that we dropped BPF_CORE_READ() here and went with
> `link->type`. Should we restore BPF_CORE_READ(link, type) here and
> solve the problem, while also supporting this feature on wider set of
> kernels? Quentin?

Good point. Using the latest fancy feature might not be the best way as old
kernels won't work and this is a strong argument. I will change
to use BPF_CORE_READ in v2.

>
>>                                                        BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show
  2024-03-11 23:30   ` Yonghong Song
@ 2024-03-12 14:00     ` Quentin Monnet
  2024-03-12 15:23       ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2024-03-12 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau

2024-03-11 23:30 UTC+0000 ~ Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> 
> On 3/11/24 4:13 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:41 PM Yonghong Song
>> <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>>> Current 'bpftool link' command does not show pids, e.g.,
>>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>>    ...
>>>    4: tracing  prog 23
>>>          prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>>>          target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>>>
>>> Hack the following change to enable normal libbpf debug output,
>>>    --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>>    +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>>    @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map,
>>> enum bpf_obj_type type)
>>>            /* we don't want output polluted with libbpf errors if
>>> bpf_iter is not
>>>             * supported
>>>             */
>>>    -       default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none);
>>>    +       /* default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none); */
>>>            err = pid_iter_bpf__load(skel);
>>>    -       libbpf_set_print(default_print);
>>>    +       /* libbpf_set_print(default_print); */

I'm taking note to make these logs available when users pass the --debug
flag (https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool/issues/137), there's no reason
to hide them in that case.

>>>
>>> Rerun the above bpftool command:
>>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': BPF program load failed: Permission denied
>>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
>>>    0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
>>>    ; struct task_struct *task = ctx->task; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:69
>>>    0: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)          ; R1=ctx()
>>> R6_w=ptr_or_null_task_struct(id=1)
>>>    ; struct file *file = ctx->file; @ pid_iter.bpf.c:68
>>>    ...
>>>    ; struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *) file->private_data;
>>> @ pid_iter.bpf.c:103
>>>    80: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r8 +432)       ; R3_w=scalar() R8=ptr_file()
>>>    ; if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum
>>> bpf_link_type___local, @ pid_iter.bpf.c:105
>>>    81: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r3 +12)
>>>    R3 invalid mem access 'scalar'
>>>    processed 39 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0
>>> total_states 3 peak_states 3 mark_read 2
>>>    -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
>>>    libbpf: prog 'iter': failed to load: -13
>>>    ...
>>>
>>> The 'file->private_data' returns a 'void' type and this caused
>>> subsequent 'link->type'
>>> (insn #81) failed in verification.
>>>
>>> To fix the issue, do a type cast from 'void *' to 'struct bpf_link *'
>>> for file->private_data
>>> as in this patch, and the 'bpftool link' runs successfully with 'pids'.
>>>    $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>>    ...
>>>    4: tracing  prog 23
>>>          prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>>>          target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>>>          pids systemd(1)
>>>
>>> Fixes: 44ba7b30e84f ("bpftool: Use a local copy of
>>> BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT in pid_iter.bpf.c")
>>> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>>> b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>>> index 26004f0c5a6a..96ffcc4f0e67 100644
>>> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>>> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/skeleton/pid_iter.bpf.c
>>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int iter(struct bpf_iter__task_file *ctx)
>>>          if (obj_type == BPF_OBJ_LINK &&
>>>              bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_link_type___local,
>>>                                        
>>> BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT___local)) {
>>> -               struct bpf_link *link = (struct bpf_link *)
>>> file->private_data;
>>> +               struct bpf_link *link =
>>> bpf_core_cast(file->private_data, struct bpf_link);
>> bpf_core_cast() (i.e., bpf_rdonly_cast()) is newer feature, so relying
>> on it in bpftool will make PID printing not work on older kernels that
>> generally do support iter/task_file iterators.
>>
>>>                  if (link->type == bpf_core_enum_value(enum
>>> bpf_link_type___local,
>> the problem is that we dropped BPF_CORE_READ() here and went with
>> `link->type`. Should we restore BPF_CORE_READ(link, type) here and
>> solve the problem, while also supporting this feature on wider set of
>> kernels? Quentin?
> 
> Good point. Using the latest fancy feature might not be the best way as old
> kernels won't work and this is a strong argument. I will change
> to use BPF_CORE_READ in v2.

Agreed, the whole point of commit 44ba7b30e84f that introduced the issue
was to make bpftool work with older kernels. BPF_CORE_READ sounds like
the right approach, thank you!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show
  2024-03-12 14:00     ` Quentin Monnet
@ 2024-03-12 15:23       ` Yonghong Song
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2024-03-12 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Monnet, Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Daniel Borkmann,
	kernel-team, Martin KaFai Lau


On 3/12/24 7:00 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2024-03-11 23:30 UTC+0000 ~ Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> On 3/11/24 4:13 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:41 PM Yonghong Song
>>> <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>>>> Current 'bpftool link' command does not show pids, e.g.,
>>>>     $ tools/build/bpftool/bpftool link
>>>>     ...
>>>>     4: tracing  prog 23
>>>>           prog_type lsm  attach_type lsm_mac
>>>>           target_obj_id 1  target_btf_id 31320
>>>>
>>>> Hack the following change to enable normal libbpf debug output,
>>>>     --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>>>     +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
>>>>     @@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map,
>>>> enum bpf_obj_type type)
>>>>             /* we don't want output polluted with libbpf errors if
>>>> bpf_iter is not
>>>>              * supported
>>>>              */
>>>>     -       default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none);
>>>>     +       /* default_print = libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_none); */
>>>>             err = pid_iter_bpf__load(skel);
>>>>     -       libbpf_set_print(default_print);
>>>>     +       /* libbpf_set_print(default_print); */
> I'm taking note to make these logs available when users pass the --debug
> flag (https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool/issues/137), there's no reason
> to hide them in that case.

Totally make sense as most kernels used in production should already have
bpf_link and bpf_iter support already.

[...]


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-12 15:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-11 21:41 [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Fix missing pids during link show Yonghong Song
2024-03-11 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-11 23:30   ` Yonghong Song
2024-03-12 14:00     ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-12 15:23       ` Yonghong Song

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox