From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:19:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66101695d69a7_5803020833@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404025310.2211688-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Yonghong Song wrote:
> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
> attachment life cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 6 +
> include/linux/skmsg.h | 4 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 +
> net/core/sock_map.c | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +
> 6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
LGTM one question below.
> +/* Handle the following two cases:
> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
> + */
> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
> + struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_prog *old)
> +{
> + const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
> + struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> + struct bpf_link **plink;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +
> + /* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
> + if (old && link->prog != old) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + /* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
> + if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
> + link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
> + sockmap_link->attach_type);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
> + ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
> + sockmap_link->attach_type);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (old) {
> + ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> +
> +out:
> + if (!ret) {
> + bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> + old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> + bpf_prog_put(old);
Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
if (old)
bpf_prog_put(old)
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 2:53 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs Yonghong Song
2024-04-04 2:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] " Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 15:19 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2024-04-05 15:53 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 16:23 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-05 16:51 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 19:43 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-05 20:05 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 20:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-06 5:21 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-04 2:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 15:20 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-05 20:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-06 5:19 ` Yonghong Song
2024-04-04 2:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] bpftool: Add link dump support for BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP Yonghong Song
2024-04-05 15:20 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-04 2:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/5] selftests/bpf: Refactor out helper functions for a few tests Yonghong Song
2024-04-04 2:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add some tests with new bpf_program__attach_sockmap() APIs Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66101695d69a7_5803020833@john.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox