[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

One of our internal services started to use sk_msg program and currently
it used existing prog attach/detach2 as demonstrated in selftests.
But attach/detach of all other bpf programs are based on bpf_link.
Consistent attach/detach APIs for all programs will make things easy to
undersand and less error prone. So this patch added bpf_link
support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG. Based on comments from
previous RFC patch, I added BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB support as well
as both program types have similar treatment w.r.t. bpf_link
handling.

For the patch series, patch 1 added kernel support. Patch 2
added libbpf support. Patch 3 added bpftool support and
patches 4/5 added some new tests.

Changelogs:
  v3 -> v4:
    - use a single mutex lock to protect both attach/detach/update
      and release/fill_info/show_fdinfo.
    - simplify code for sock_map_link_lookup().
    - fix a few bugs.
    - add more tests.
  v2 -> v3:
    - consolidate link types of sk_msg and sk_skb to
      a single link type BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP.
    - fix bpf_link lifecycle issue. in v2, after bpf_link
      is attached, a subsequent prog_attach could change
      that bpf_link. this patch makes bpf_link having
      correct behavior such that it won't go away facing
      other prog/link attach for the same map and the same
      attach type.

Yonghong Song (5):
  bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs
  libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP
  bpftool: Add link dump support for BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP
  selftests/bpf: Refactor out helper functions for a few tests
  selftests/bpf: Add some tests with new bpf_program__attach_sockmap()
    APIs

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   6 +
 include/linux/skmsg.h                         |   4 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   5 +
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   4 +
 net/core/sock_map.c                           | 268 +++++++++++++++++-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c                      |   9 +
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   5 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |   7 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |   2 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   6 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h                |   2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 171 ++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c |  38 +++
 .../bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c       |  27 +-
 .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c        |  17 +-
 .../progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c   |   2 +-
 16 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
attachment life cycle.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
 include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
 net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
 6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 62762390c93d..5034c1b4ded7 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2996,6 +2996,7 @@ int sock_map_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr, enum bpf_prog_type ptype);
 int sock_map_update_elem_sys(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 			    union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
+int sock_map_link_create(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog);
 
 void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk);
 void sock_map_destroy(struct sock *sk);
@@ -3094,6 +3095,11 @@ static inline int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
+
+static inline int sock_map_link_create(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
 #endif /* CONFIG_NET && CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
 
diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index e65ec3fd2799..9c8dd4c01412 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ struct sk_psock_progs {
 	struct bpf_prog			*stream_parser;
 	struct bpf_prog			*stream_verdict;
 	struct bpf_prog			*skb_verdict;
+	struct bpf_link			*msg_parser_link;
+	struct bpf_link			*stream_parser_link;
+	struct bpf_link			*stream_verdict_link;
+	struct bpf_link			*skb_verdict_link;
 };
 
 enum sk_psock_state_bits {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 79c548276b6b..4b24b7c2b612 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX = 11,
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI = 12,
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT = 13,
+	BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP = 14,
 	__MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
 };
 
@@ -6724,6 +6725,10 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
 			__u32 ifindex;
 			__u32 attach_type;
 		} netkit;
+		struct {
+			__u32 map_id;
+			__u32 attach_type;
+		} sockmap;
 	};
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index e44c276e8617..7d392ec83655 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -5213,6 +5213,10 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
 		ret = netns_bpf_link_create(attr, prog);
 		break;
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG:
+	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB:
+		ret = sock_map_link_create(attr, prog);
+		break;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP:
 		ret = bpf_xdp_link_attach(attr, prog);
diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 27d733c0f65e..1e1d24692706 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -24,8 +24,16 @@ struct bpf_stab {
 #define SOCK_CREATE_FLAG_MASK				\
 	(BPF_F_NUMA_NODE | BPF_F_RDONLY | BPF_F_WRONLY)
 
+/* This mutex is used to
+ *  - protect race between prog/link attach/detach and link prog update, and
+ *  - protect race between releasing and accessing map in bpf_link.
+ * A single global mutex lock is used since it is expected contention is low.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(sockmap_mutex);
+
 static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog,
-				struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which);
+				struct bpf_prog *old, struct bpf_link *link,
+				u32 which);
 static struct sk_psock_progs *sock_map_progs(struct bpf_map *map);
 
 static struct bpf_map *sock_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
@@ -71,7 +79,7 @@ int sock_map_get_from_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	map = __bpf_map_get(f);
 	if (IS_ERR(map))
 		return PTR_ERR(map);
-	ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, prog, NULL, attr->attach_type);
+	ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, prog, NULL, NULL, attr->attach_type);
 	fdput(f);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -103,7 +111,7 @@ int sock_map_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr, enum bpf_prog_type ptype)
 		goto put_prog;
 	}
 
-	ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, attr->attach_type);
+	ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, NULL, attr->attach_type);
 put_prog:
 	bpf_prog_put(prog);
 put_map:
@@ -1488,21 +1496,79 @@ static int sock_map_prog_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog ***pprog,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int sock_map_link_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_link ***plink,
+				struct bpf_link *link, bool skip_check, u32 which)
+{
+	struct sk_psock_progs *progs = sock_map_progs(map);
+	struct bpf_link **cur_plink;
+
+	switch (which) {
+	case BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT:
+		cur_plink = &progs->msg_parser_link;
+		break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
+	case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
+		cur_plink = &progs->stream_parser_link;
+		break;
+#endif
+	case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
+		cur_plink = &progs->stream_verdict_link;
+		break;
+	case BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT:
+		cur_plink = &progs->skb_verdict_link;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (!skip_check && ((!link && *cur_plink) || (link && link != *cur_plink)))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	*plink = cur_plink;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Handle the following four cases:
+ * prog_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link == NULL
+ * prog_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link == NULL
+ * link_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link != NULL
+ * link_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link != NULL
+ */
 static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog,
-				struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which)
+				struct bpf_prog *old, struct bpf_link *link,
+				u32 which)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
+	struct bpf_link **plink;
 	int ret;
 
+	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
+
 	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(map, &pprog, which);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		goto out;
 
-	if (old)
-		return psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
+	if (!link || prog)
+		ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, false, which);
+	else
+		ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, true, which);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (old) {
+		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
+		if (!ret)
+			*plink = NULL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
-	return 0;
+	if (link)
+		*plink = link;
+
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
@@ -1657,6 +1723,192 @@ void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_close);
 
+struct sockmap_link {
+	struct bpf_link link;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
+};
+
+static void sock_map_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
+
+	if (sockmap_link->map) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(sock_map_prog_update(sockmap_link->map, NULL, link->prog, link,
+						  sockmap_link->attach_type));
+
+		mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
+		bpf_map_put_with_uref(sockmap_link->map);
+		sockmap_link->map = NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
+	}
+}
+
+static int sock_map_link_detach(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	sock_map_link_release(link);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sock_map_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	kfree(link);
+}
+
+/* Handle the following two cases:
+ * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
+ * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
+ */
+static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
+				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
+				     struct bpf_prog *old)
+{
+	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
+	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
+	struct bpf_link **plink;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
+
+	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
+	if (old && link->prog != old) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
+	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
+	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
+				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
+	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
+				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (old) {
+		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
+
+out:
+	if (!ret) {
+		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
+		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
+		bpf_prog_put(old);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static u32 sock_map_link_get_map_id(const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link)
+{
+	u32 map_id = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
+	if (sockmap_link->map)
+		map_id = sockmap_link->map->id;
+	mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
+	return map_id;
+}
+
+static int sock_map_link_fill_info(const struct bpf_link *link,
+				   struct bpf_link_info *info)
+{
+	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
+	u32 map_id = sock_map_link_get_map_id(sockmap_link);
+
+	info->sockmap.map_id = map_id;
+	info->sockmap.attach_type = sockmap_link->attach_type;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sock_map_link_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_link *link,
+				      struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
+	u32 map_id = sock_map_link_get_map_id(sockmap_link);
+
+	seq_printf(seq, "map_id:\t%u\n", map_id);
+	seq_printf(seq, "attach_type:\t%u\n", sockmap_link->attach_type);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_link_ops sock_map_link_ops = {
+	.release = sock_map_link_release,
+	.dealloc = sock_map_link_dealloc,
+	.detach = sock_map_link_detach,
+	.update_prog = sock_map_link_update_prog,
+	.fill_link_info = sock_map_link_fill_info,
+	.show_fdinfo = sock_map_link_show_fdinfo,
+};
+
+int sock_map_link_create(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
+	struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link;
+	enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (attr->link_create.flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	map = bpf_map_get_with_uref(attr->link_create.target_fd);
+	if (IS_ERR(map))
+		return PTR_ERR(map);
+	if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP && map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	sockmap_link = kzalloc(sizeof(*sockmap_link), GFP_USER);
+	if (!sockmap_link) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	attach_type = attr->link_create.attach_type;
+	bpf_link_init(&sockmap_link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP, &sock_map_link_ops, prog);
+	sockmap_link->map = map;
+	sockmap_link->attach_type = attach_type;
+
+	ret = bpf_link_prime(&sockmap_link->link, &link_primer);
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(sockmap_link);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, prog, NULL, &sockmap_link->link, attach_type);
+	if (ret) {
+		bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Increase refcnt for the prog since when old prog is replaced with
+	 * psock_replace_prog() and psock_set_prog() its refcnt will be decreased.
+	 *
+	 * Actually, we do not need to increase refcnt for the prog since bpf_link
+	 * will hold a reference. But in order to have less complexity w.r.t.
+	 * replacing/setting prog, let us increase the refcnt to make things simpler.
+	 */
+	bpf_prog_inc(prog);
+
+	return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
+
+out:
+	bpf_map_put_with_uref(map);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int sock_map_iter_attach_target(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				       union bpf_iter_link_info *linfo,
 				       struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 79c548276b6b..4b24b7c2b612 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1135,6 +1135,7 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX = 11,
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI = 12,
 	BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT = 13,
+	BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP = 14,
 	__MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE,
 };
 
@@ -6724,6 +6725,10 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
 			__u32 ifindex;
 			__u32 attach_type;
 		} netkit;
+		struct {
+			__u32 map_id;
+			__u32 attach_type;
+		} sockmap;
 	};
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 
-- 
2.43.0

RE: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[John Fastabend]

Yonghong Song wrote:
> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
> attachment life cycle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>  include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>  net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>  6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

LGTM one question below.

> +/* Handle the following two cases:
> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
> + */
> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
> +{
> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +
> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (old) {
> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> +
> +out:
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> +		bpf_prog_put(old);

Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?

  if (old)
     bpf_prog_put(old)

> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> Yonghong Song wrote:
>> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
>> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
>> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
>> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
>> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
>> attachment life cycle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>>   include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>>   net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>>   6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
> LGTM one question below.
>
>> +/* Handle the following two cases:
>> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
>> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
>> + */
>> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
>> +{
>> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
>> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
>> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +
>> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
>> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
>> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
>> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
>> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	if (old) {
>> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	if (!ret) {
>> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>> +		bpf_prog_put(old);
> Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
>
>    if (old)
>       bpf_prog_put(old)

The 'old' here represents the *old* link->prog program and
link->prog should not be NULL at this point.

If sock_map_link_update_prog() is called here, that means,
the kernel already holds a reference for the bpf link.
See kernel/bpf/syscall.c, link_update().

So the bpf_link is valid and not in released stage, and
link->prog should not be NULL.

>
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[John Fastabend]

Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> > Yonghong Song wrote:
> >> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
> >> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
> >> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
> >> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
> >> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
> >> attachment life cycle.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> >> ---
> >>   include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
> >>   include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
> >>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
> >>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
> >>   net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
> >>   6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> > LGTM one question below.
> >
> >> +/* Handle the following two cases:
> >> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
> >> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
> >> + */
> >> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
> >> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
> >> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
> >> +{
> >> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
> >> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> >> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
> >> +	int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> >> +
> >> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
> >> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
> >> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +	}
> >> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
> >> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
> >> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
> >> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
> >> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
> >> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
> >> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +
> >> +	if (old) {
> >> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> >> +
> >> +out:
> >> +	if (!ret) {
> >> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> >> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> >> +		bpf_prog_put(old);
> > Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
> >
> >    if (old)
> >       bpf_prog_put(old)
> 
> The 'old' here represents the *old* link->prog program and
> link->prog should not be NULL at this point.

Ah ok. Maybe instead of using the input old var make it
explicit?

    if (!ret) {
       struct bpf_prog *old_link;

       bpf_prog_inc(prog);
       old_link = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
       bpf_prog_put(old)
    }

Is a bit more obious to me at least. Up to you I have a slight preference
for the explicit more verbose above.

Otherwise for the series.

Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

On 4/5/24 9:23 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
>>>> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
>>>> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
>>>> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
>>>> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
>>>> attachment life cycle.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>>>>    include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>>>>    include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>>>>    kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>>>>    net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>    tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>>>>    6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> LGTM one question below.
>>>
>>>> +/* Handle the following two cases:
>>>> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
>>>> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
>>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
>>>> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
>>>> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
>>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
>>>> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
>>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
>>>> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
>>>> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
>>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
>>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
>>>> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
>>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (old) {
>>>> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
>>>> +
>>>> +out:
>>>> +	if (!ret) {
>>>> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>>>> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>>>> +		bpf_prog_put(old);
>>> Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
>>>
>>>     if (old)
>>>        bpf_prog_put(old)
>> The 'old' here represents the *old* link->prog program and
>> link->prog should not be NULL at this point.
> Ah ok. Maybe instead of using the input old var make it
> explicit?
>
>      if (!ret) {
>         struct bpf_prog *old_link;
>
>         bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>         old_link = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>         bpf_prog_put(old)
>      }
>
> Is a bit more obious to me at least. Up to you I have a slight preference
> for the explicit more verbose above.

Regarding naming convention, yes, it is hard. My above code similar to
kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c:

static int bpf_netns_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
                                       struct bpf_prog *new_prog,
                                       struct bpf_prog *old_prog)
{
         struct bpf_netns_link *net_link =
                 container_of(link, struct bpf_netns_link, link);
         enum netns_bpf_attach_type type = net_link->netns_type;
         struct bpf_prog_array *run_array;
         struct net *net;
         int idx, ret;
         
         if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
                 return -EPERM;
	...
	old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
         bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
	...
}

The 'old_prog' is reused in the above.

I am okay to change
	old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
to
	old_link_prog = xchg(&link->prog, prog);

in next revision (if requested or additional changes needed)
or as a followup.

>
> Otherwise for the series.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[John Fastabend]

Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> On 4/5/24 9:23 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> > Yonghong Song wrote:
> >> On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> >>> Yonghong Song wrote:
> >>>> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
> >>>> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
> >>>> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
> >>>> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
> >>>> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
> >>>> attachment life cycle.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
> >>>>    include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
> >>>>    include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
> >>>>    kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
> >>>>    net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>    tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
> >>>>    6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>> LGTM one question below.
> >>>
> >>>> +/* Handle the following two cases:
> >>>> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
> >>>> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
> >>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
> >>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
> >>>> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> >>>> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
> >>>> +	int ret = 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
> >>>> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
> >>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>> +		goto out;
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
> >>>> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
> >>>> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
> >>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>> +		goto out;
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
> >>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> >>>> +	if (ret)
> >>>> +		goto out;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
> >>>> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
> >>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
> >>>> +	if (ret)
> >>>> +		goto out;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (old) {
> >>>> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> >>>> +		goto out;
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +out:
> >>>> +	if (!ret) {
> >>>> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> >>>> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> >>>> +		bpf_prog_put(old);
> >>> Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
> >>>
> >>>     if (old)
> >>>        bpf_prog_put(old)
> >> The 'old' here represents the *old* link->prog program and
> >> link->prog should not be NULL at this point.
> > Ah ok. Maybe instead of using the input old var make it
> > explicit?
> >
> >      if (!ret) {
> >         struct bpf_prog *old_link;
> >
> >         bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> >         old_link = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> >         bpf_prog_put(old)
> >      }
> >
> > Is a bit more obious to me at least. Up to you I have a slight preference
> > for the explicit more verbose above.
> 
> Regarding naming convention, yes, it is hard. My above code similar to
> kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c:
> 
> static int bpf_netns_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>                                        struct bpf_prog *new_prog,
>                                        struct bpf_prog *old_prog)
> {
>          struct bpf_netns_link *net_link =
>                  container_of(link, struct bpf_netns_link, link);
>          enum netns_bpf_attach_type type = net_link->netns_type;
>          struct bpf_prog_array *run_array;
>          struct net *net;
>          int idx, ret;
>          
>          if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
>                  return -EPERM;
> 	...
> 	old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
>          bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> 	...
> }
> 
> The 'old_prog' is reused in the above.
> 
> I am okay to change
> 	old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> to
> 	old_link_prog = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> 
> in next revision (if requested or additional changes needed)
> or as a followup.

I'm good with this series as is LGTM. We can do a follow up if we want.
Although the xchg is exactly one line above so I'm not sure its even necessary.

> 
> >
> > Otherwise for the series.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

On 4/5/24 12:43 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 4/5/24 9:23 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>>>> Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>>>> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
>>>>>> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
>>>>>> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
>>>>>> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
>>>>>> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
>>>>>> attachment life cycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>>>>>>     include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>>>>>>     include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>>>>>>     kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>>>>>>     net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>     tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>>>>>>     6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> LGTM one question below.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* Handle the following two cases:
>>>>>> + * case 1: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old != NULL
>>>>>> + * case 2: link != NULL, prog != NULL, old == NULL
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static int sock_map_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>>>>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *prog,
>>>>>> +				     struct bpf_prog *old)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	const struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
>>>>>> +	struct bpf_prog **pprog;
>>>>>> +	struct bpf_link **plink;
>>>>>> +	int ret = 0;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	/* If old prog is not NULL, ensure old prog is the same as link->prog. */
>>>>>> +	if (old && link->prog != old) {
>>>>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +	/* Ensure link->prog has the same type/attach_type as the new prog. */
>>>>>> +	if (link->prog->type != prog->type ||
>>>>>> +	    link->prog->expected_attach_type != prog->expected_attach_type) {
>>>>>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &pprog,
>>>>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	/* Ensure the same link between the one in map and the passed-in. */
>>>>>> +	ret = sock_map_link_lookup(sockmap_link->map, &plink, link, false,
>>>>>> +				   sockmap_link->attach_type);
>>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (old) {
>>>>>> +		ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +out:
>>>>>> +	if (!ret) {
>>>>>> +		bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>>>>>> +		old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>>>>>> +		bpf_prog_put(old);
>>>>> Need to check old? I don't think we can clal bpf_prog_put on null?
>>>>>
>>>>>      if (old)
>>>>>         bpf_prog_put(old)
>>>> The 'old' here represents the *old* link->prog program and
>>>> link->prog should not be NULL at this point.
>>> Ah ok. Maybe instead of using the input old var make it
>>> explicit?
>>>
>>>       if (!ret) {
>>>          struct bpf_prog *old_link;
>>>
>>>          bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>>>          old_link = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>>>          bpf_prog_put(old)
>>>       }
>>>
>>> Is a bit more obious to me at least. Up to you I have a slight preference
>>> for the explicit more verbose above.
>> Regarding naming convention, yes, it is hard. My above code similar to
>> kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c:
>>
>> static int bpf_netns_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>>                                         struct bpf_prog *new_prog,
>>                                         struct bpf_prog *old_prog)
>> {
>>           struct bpf_netns_link *net_link =
>>                   container_of(link, struct bpf_netns_link, link);
>>           enum netns_bpf_attach_type type = net_link->netns_type;
>>           struct bpf_prog_array *run_array;
>>           struct net *net;
>>           int idx, ret;
>>           
>>           if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
>>                   return -EPERM;
>> 	...
>> 	old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
>>           bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>> 	...
>> }
>>
>> The 'old_prog' is reused in the above.
>>
>> I am okay to change
>> 	old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>> to
>> 	old_link_prog = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>>
>> in next revision (if requested or additional changes needed)
>> or as a followup.
> I'm good with this series as is LGTM. We can do a follow up if we want.

Thanks! Sounds good to me.

> Although the xchg is exactly one line above so I'm not sure its even necessary.

the xchg inpsock_set_prog() is used to set prog in pprog. The xchg I added is for 
&link->prog. I didn't make a change to psock_set_prog() since it is used 
in different places and I do not want to polute it with extra link 
parameter.

>
>>> Otherwise for the series.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:53 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
> attachment life cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>  include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>  net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>  6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>

[...]

> @@ -103,7 +111,7 @@ int sock_map_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr, enum bpf_prog_type ptype)
>                 goto put_prog;
>         }
>
> -       ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, attr->attach_type);
> +       ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, NULL, attr->attach_type);
>  put_prog:
>         bpf_prog_put(prog);
>  put_map:
> @@ -1488,21 +1496,79 @@ static int sock_map_prog_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog ***pprog,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int sock_map_link_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_link ***plink,
> +                               struct bpf_link *link, bool skip_check, u32 which)

why not combine prog + link into a single lookup? also it seems like
sock_map_prog_lookup has some additional EBUSY conditions, do we need
to replicate them here?

> +{
> +       struct sk_psock_progs *progs = sock_map_progs(map);
> +       struct bpf_link **cur_plink;
> +
> +       switch (which) {
> +       case BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT:
> +               cur_plink = &progs->msg_parser_link;
> +               break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
> +               cur_plink = &progs->stream_parser_link;
> +               break;
> +#endif
> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
> +               cur_plink = &progs->stream_verdict_link;
> +               break;
> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT:
> +               cur_plink = &progs->skb_verdict_link;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (!skip_check && ((!link && *cur_plink) || (link && link != *cur_plink)))
> +               return -EBUSY;
> +
> +       *plink = cur_plink;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle the following four cases:
> + * prog_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link == NULL
> + * prog_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link == NULL
> + * link_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link != NULL
> + * link_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link != NULL
> + */
>  static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> -                               struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which)
> +                               struct bpf_prog *old, struct bpf_link *link,
> +                               u32 which)
>  {
>         struct bpf_prog **pprog;
> +       struct bpf_link **plink;
>         int ret;
>
> +       mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +
>         ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(map, &pprog, which);
>         if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> +               goto out;
>
> -       if (old)
> -               return psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> +       if (!link || prog)
> +               ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, false, which);
> +       else
> +               ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, true, which);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       if (old) {
> +               ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> +               if (!ret)
> +                       *plink = NULL;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
>
>         psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> -       return 0;
> +       if (link)
> +               *plink = link;

nit: feels more natural to do

if (old) {
    psock_replace_prog(...)
} else {
    psock_set_prog(...)
}

it's two alternatives, not one unlikely vs one main use case (but it's minor)

> +
> +out:
> +       mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> @@ -1657,6 +1723,192 @@ void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_close);
>
> +struct sockmap_link {
> +       struct bpf_link link;
> +       struct bpf_map *map;
> +       enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
> +};
> +
> +static void sock_map_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
> +{
> +       struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
> +
> +       if (sockmap_link->map) {

nit: if (!sockmap_link->map) return;

and reduce nesting of everything else

> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(sock_map_prog_update(sockmap_link->map, NULL, link->prog, link,
> +                                                 sockmap_link->attach_type));

I think sockmap_link->map access in general has to be always protected
my sockmap_mutex (I'd do that even for the if above), because it can
race with force-detach logic at least

> +
> +               mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +               bpf_map_put_with_uref(sockmap_link->map);
> +               sockmap_link->map = NULL;
> +               mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +       }
> +}
> +

[...]

> +       if (old) {
> +               ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +
> +       psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
> +
> +out:

same nit, feels like

if (old) /* replace */ else /* set */ is more natural, and then you
can move xchg logic before out: knowing that it's the only success
case

> +       if (!ret) {
> +               bpf_prog_inc(prog);
> +               old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
> +               bpf_prog_put(old);
> +       }
> +       mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +

[...]

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb progs

[Yonghong Song]

On 4/5/24 1:12 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:53 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>> Add bpf_link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs. We have an
>> internal request to support bpf_link for sk_msg programs so user
>> space can have a uniform handling with bpf_link based libbpf
>> APIs. Using bpf_link based libbpf API also has a benefit which
>> makes system robust by decoupling prog life cycle and
>> attachment life cycle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/bpf.h            |   6 +
>>   include/linux/skmsg.h          |   4 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |   5 +
>>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   4 +
>>   net/core/sock_map.c            | 268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |   5 +
>>   6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -103,7 +111,7 @@ int sock_map_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr, enum bpf_prog_type ptype)
>>                  goto put_prog;
>>          }
>>
>> -       ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, attr->attach_type);
>> +       ret = sock_map_prog_update(map, NULL, prog, NULL, attr->attach_type);
>>   put_prog:
>>          bpf_prog_put(prog);
>>   put_map:
>> @@ -1488,21 +1496,79 @@ static int sock_map_prog_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog ***pprog,
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int sock_map_link_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_link ***plink,
>> +                               struct bpf_link *link, bool skip_check, u32 which)
> why not combine prog + link into a single lookup? also it seems like
> sock_map_prog_lookup has some additional EBUSY conditions, do we need
> to replicate them here?

I can combine them together.

>
>> +{
>> +       struct sk_psock_progs *progs = sock_map_progs(map);
>> +       struct bpf_link **cur_plink;
>> +
>> +       switch (which) {
>> +       case BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT:
>> +               cur_plink = &progs->msg_parser_link;
>> +               break;
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
>> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER:
>> +               cur_plink = &progs->stream_parser_link;
>> +               break;
>> +#endif
>> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT:
>> +               cur_plink = &progs->stream_verdict_link;
>> +               break;
>> +       case BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT:
>> +               cur_plink = &progs->skb_verdict_link;
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       if (!skip_check && ((!link && *cur_plink) || (link && link != *cur_plink)))
>> +               return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> +       *plink = cur_plink;
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle the following four cases:
>> + * prog_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link == NULL
>> + * prog_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link == NULL
>> + * link_attach: prog != NULL, old == NULL, link != NULL
>> + * link_detach: prog == NULL, old != NULL, link != NULL
>> + */
>>   static int sock_map_prog_update(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> -                               struct bpf_prog *old, u32 which)
>> +                               struct bpf_prog *old, struct bpf_link *link,
>> +                               u32 which)
>>   {
>>          struct bpf_prog **pprog;
>> +       struct bpf_link **plink;
>>          int ret;
>>
>> +       mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +
>>          ret = sock_map_prog_lookup(map, &pprog, which);
>>          if (ret)
>> -               return ret;
>> +               goto out;
>>
>> -       if (old)
>> -               return psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>> +       if (!link || prog)
>> +               ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, false, which);
>> +       else
>> +               ret = sock_map_link_lookup(map, &plink, NULL, true, which);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       if (old) {
>> +               ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>> +               if (!ret)
>> +                       *plink = NULL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>>
>>          psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
>> -       return 0;
>> +       if (link)
>> +               *plink = link;
> nit: feels more natural to do
>
> if (old) {
>      psock_replace_prog(...)
> } else {
>      psock_set_prog(...)
> }
>
> it's two alternatives, not one unlikely vs one main use case (but it's minor)

Ack indeed better.

>
>> +
>> +out:
>> +       mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +       return ret;
>>   }
>>
>>   int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
>> @@ -1657,6 +1723,192 @@ void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_close);
>>
>> +struct sockmap_link {
>> +       struct bpf_link link;
>> +       struct bpf_map *map;
>> +       enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void sock_map_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
>> +{
>> +       struct sockmap_link *sockmap_link = container_of(link, struct sockmap_link, link);
>> +
>> +       if (sockmap_link->map) {
> nit: if (!sockmap_link->map) return;
>
> and reduce nesting of everything else
>
>> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(sock_map_prog_update(sockmap_link->map, NULL, link->prog, link,
>> +                                                 sockmap_link->attach_type));
> I think sockmap_link->map access in general has to be always protected
> my sockmap_mutex (I'd do that even for the if above), because it can
> race with force-detach logic at least

Ack. will fix this.

>
>> +
>> +               mutex_lock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +               bpf_map_put_with_uref(sockmap_link->map);
>> +               sockmap_link->map = NULL;
>> +               mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
> [...]
>
>> +       if (old) {
>> +               ret = psock_replace_prog(pprog, prog, old);
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       psock_set_prog(pprog, prog);
>> +
>> +out:
> same nit, feels like
>
> if (old) /* replace */ else /* set */ is more natural, and then you
> can move xchg logic before out: knowing that it's the only success
> case

Ack. will do.

>
>> +       if (!ret) {
>> +               bpf_prog_inc(prog);
>> +               old = xchg(&link->prog, prog);
>> +               bpf_prog_put(old);
>> +       }
>> +       mutex_unlock(&sockmap_mutex);
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
> [...]

[PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[Yonghong Song]

Introduce a libbpf API function bpf_program__attach_sockmap()
which allow user to get a bpf_link for their corresponding programs.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c         | 7 +++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h         | 2 ++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map       | 6 ++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index b091154bc5b5..97eb6e5dd7c8 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static const char * const link_type_name[] = {
 	[BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX]			= "tcx",
 	[BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI]		= "uprobe_multi",
 	[BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT]			= "netkit",
+	[BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP]			= "sockmap",
 };
 
 static const char * const map_type_name[] = {
@@ -12533,6 +12534,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd)
 	return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, netns_fd, "netns", NULL);
 }
 
+struct bpf_link *
+bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd)
+{
+	return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, map_fd, "sockmap", NULL);
+}
+
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex)
 {
 	/* target_fd/target_ifindex use the same field in LINK_CREATE */
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index f88ab50c0229..4c7ada03bf4f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ bpf_program__attach_cgroup(const struct bpf_program *prog, int cgroup_fd);
 LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd);
 LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
+bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd);
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex);
 LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
 bpf_program__attach_freplace(const struct bpf_program *prog,
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 51732ecb1385..015737439007 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -411,8 +411,14 @@ LIBBPF_1.3.0 {
 LIBBPF_1.4.0 {
 	global:
 		bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint_opts;
+		bpf_program__attach_sockmap;
 		bpf_raw_tracepoint_open_opts;
 		bpf_token_create;
 		btf__new_split;
 		btf_ext__raw_data;
 } LIBBPF_1.3.0;
+
+LIBBPF_1.5.0 {
+	global:
+		bpf_program__attach_sockmap;
+} LIBBPF_1.4.0;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
index e783a47da815..d6e5eff967cb 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
 #define __LIBBPF_VERSION_H
 
 #define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION 1
-#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 4
+#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 5
 
 #endif /* __LIBBPF_VERSION_H */
-- 
2.43.0

RE: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[John Fastabend]

Yonghong Song wrote:
> Introduce a libbpf API function bpf_program__attach_sockmap()
> which allow user to get a bpf_link for their corresponding programs.
> 
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:53 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce a libbpf API function bpf_program__attach_sockmap()
> which allow user to get a bpf_link for their corresponding programs.
>
> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c         | 7 +++++++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h         | 2 ++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map       | 6 ++++++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index b091154bc5b5..97eb6e5dd7c8 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static const char * const link_type_name[] = {
>         [BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX]                     = "tcx",
>         [BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI]            = "uprobe_multi",
>         [BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT]                  = "netkit",
> +       [BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP]                 = "sockmap",
>  };
>
>  static const char * const map_type_name[] = {
> @@ -12533,6 +12534,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd)
>         return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, netns_fd, "netns", NULL);
>  }
>
> +struct bpf_link *
> +bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd)
> +{
> +       return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, map_fd, "sockmap", NULL);
> +}
> +
>  struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex)
>  {
>         /* target_fd/target_ifindex use the same field in LINK_CREATE */
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index f88ab50c0229..4c7ada03bf4f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ bpf_program__attach_cgroup(const struct bpf_program *prog, int cgroup_fd);
>  LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>  bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd);
>  LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
> +bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd);
> +LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>  bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex);
>  LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>  bpf_program__attach_freplace(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> index 51732ecb1385..015737439007 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> @@ -411,8 +411,14 @@ LIBBPF_1.3.0 {
>  LIBBPF_1.4.0 {
>         global:
>                 bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint_opts;
> +               bpf_program__attach_sockmap;

leftover from the previous revision? please remove

with that:

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

>                 bpf_raw_tracepoint_open_opts;
>                 bpf_token_create;
>                 btf__new_split;
>                 btf_ext__raw_data;
>  } LIBBPF_1.3.0;
> +
> +LIBBPF_1.5.0 {
> +       global:
> +               bpf_program__attach_sockmap;
> +} LIBBPF_1.4.0;
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
> index e783a47da815..d6e5eff967cb 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
>  #define __LIBBPF_VERSION_H
>
>  #define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION 1
> -#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 4
> +#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 5
>
>  #endif /* __LIBBPF_VERSION_H */
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/5] libbpf: Add bpf_link support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[Yonghong Song]

On 4/5/24 1:14 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:53 PM Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> wrote:
>> Introduce a libbpf API function bpf_program__attach_sockmap()
>> which allow user to get a bpf_link for their corresponding programs.
>>
>> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c         | 7 +++++++
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h         | 2 ++
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map       | 6 ++++++
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h | 2 +-
>>   4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index b091154bc5b5..97eb6e5dd7c8 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static const char * const link_type_name[] = {
>>          [BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX]                     = "tcx",
>>          [BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI]            = "uprobe_multi",
>>          [BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT]                  = "netkit",
>> +       [BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP]                 = "sockmap",
>>   };
>>
>>   static const char * const map_type_name[] = {
>> @@ -12533,6 +12534,12 @@ bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd)
>>          return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, netns_fd, "netns", NULL);
>>   }
>>
>> +struct bpf_link *
>> +bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd)
>> +{
>> +       return bpf_program_attach_fd(prog, map_fd, "sockmap", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>>   struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex)
>>   {
>>          /* target_fd/target_ifindex use the same field in LINK_CREATE */
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> index f88ab50c0229..4c7ada03bf4f 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
>> @@ -795,6 +795,8 @@ bpf_program__attach_cgroup(const struct bpf_program *prog, int cgroup_fd);
>>   LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>>   bpf_program__attach_netns(const struct bpf_program *prog, int netns_fd);
>>   LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>> +bpf_program__attach_sockmap(const struct bpf_program *prog, int map_fd);
>> +LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>>   bpf_program__attach_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog, int ifindex);
>>   LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
>>   bpf_program__attach_freplace(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>> index 51732ecb1385..015737439007 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
>> @@ -411,8 +411,14 @@ LIBBPF_1.3.0 {
>>   LIBBPF_1.4.0 {
>>          global:
>>                  bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint_opts;
>> +               bpf_program__attach_sockmap;
> leftover from the previous revision? please remove

Good catch. Thanks. will fix in the next revision.

>
> with that:
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
>>                  bpf_raw_tracepoint_open_opts;
>>                  bpf_token_create;
>>                  btf__new_split;
>>                  btf_ext__raw_data;
>>   } LIBBPF_1.3.0;
>> +
>> +LIBBPF_1.5.0 {
>> +       global:
>> +               bpf_program__attach_sockmap;
>> +} LIBBPF_1.4.0;
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
>> index e783a47da815..d6e5eff967cb 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_version.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
>>   #define __LIBBPF_VERSION_H
>>
>>   #define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION 1
>> -#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 4
>> +#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION 5
>>
>>   #endif /* __LIBBPF_VERSION_H */
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>

[PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] bpftool: Add link dump support for BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[Yonghong Song]

An example output looks like:
  $ bpftool link
    1776: sk_skb  prog 49730
            map_id 0  attach_type sk_skb_verdict
            pids test_progs(8424)
    1777: sk_skb  prog 49755
            map_id 0  attach_type sk_skb_stream_verdict
            pids test_progs(8424)
    1778: sk_msg  prog 49770
            map_id 8208  attach_type sk_msg_verdict
            pids test_progs(8424)

Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
index afde9d0c2ea1..5cd503b763d7 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
@@ -526,6 +526,10 @@ static int show_link_close_json(int fd, struct bpf_link_info *info)
 		show_link_ifindex_json(info->netkit.ifindex, json_wtr);
 		show_link_attach_type_json(info->netkit.attach_type, json_wtr);
 		break;
+	case BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP:
+		jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "map_id", info->sockmap.map_id);
+		show_link_attach_type_json(info->sockmap.attach_type, json_wtr);
+		break;
 	case BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP:
 		show_link_ifindex_json(info->xdp.ifindex, json_wtr);
 		break;
@@ -915,6 +919,11 @@ static int show_link_close_plain(int fd, struct bpf_link_info *info)
 		show_link_ifindex_plain(info->netkit.ifindex);
 		show_link_attach_type_plain(info->netkit.attach_type);
 		break;
+	case BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP:
+		printf("\n\t");
+		printf("map_id %u  ", info->sockmap.map_id);
+		show_link_attach_type_plain(info->sockmap.attach_type);
+		break;
 	case BPF_LINK_TYPE_XDP:
 		printf("\n\t");
 		show_link_ifindex_plain(info->xdp.ifindex);
-- 
2.43.0

RE: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/5] bpftool: Add link dump support for BPF_LINK_TYPE_SOCKMAP

[John Fastabend]

Yonghong Song wrote:
> An example output looks like:
>   $ bpftool link
>     1776: sk_skb  prog 49730
>             map_id 0  attach_type sk_skb_verdict
>             pids test_progs(8424)
>     1777: sk_skb  prog 49755
>             map_id 0  attach_type sk_skb_stream_verdict
>             pids test_progs(8424)
>     1778: sk_msg  prog 49770
>             map_id 8208  attach_type sk_msg_verdict
>             pids test_progs(8424)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

[PATCH bpf-next v4 4/5] selftests/bpf: Refactor out helper functions for a few tests

[Yonghong Song]

These helper functions will be used later new tests as well.
There are no functionality change.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 38 +++++++++++--------
 .../bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c       |  9 ++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 77e26ecffa9d..63fb2da7930a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -475,30 +475,19 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(bool pass_prog)
 		test_sockmap_drop_prog__destroy(drop);
 }
 
-static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek(void)
+static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_helper(int map)
 {
-	int err, map, verdict, s, c1, p1, zero = 0, sent, recvd, avail;
-	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *pass;
+	int err, s, c1, p1, zero = 0, sent, recvd, avail;
 	char snd[256] = "0123456789";
 	char rcv[256] = "0";
 
-	pass = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pass, "open_and_load"))
-		return;
-	verdict = bpf_program__fd(pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
-	map = bpf_map__fd(pass->maps.sock_map_rx);
-
-	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
-		goto out;
-
 	s = socket_loopback(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
 	if (!ASSERT_GT(s, -1, "socket_loopback(s)"))
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	err = create_pair(s, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c1, &p1);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_pairs(s)"))
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &c1, BPF_NOEXIST);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem(c1)"))
@@ -520,6 +509,25 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek(void)
 out_close:
 	close(c1);
 	close(p1);
+}
+
+static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek(void)
+{
+	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *pass;
+	int err, map, verdict;
+
+	pass = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pass, "open_and_load"))
+		return;
+	verdict = bpf_program__fd(pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
+	map = bpf_map__fd(pass->maps.sock_map_rx);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_helper(map);
+
 out:
 	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(pass);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
index 45e8fc75a739..b753672f04c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ struct {
 	__type(value, __u64);
 } socket_storage SEC(".maps");
 
-SEC("sk_msg")
-int prog_msg_verdict(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
+static int prog_msg_verdict_common(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = (struct task_struct *)bpf_get_current_task();
 	int verdict = SK_PASS;
@@ -44,4 +43,10 @@ int prog_msg_verdict(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
 	return verdict;
 }
 
+SEC("sk_msg")
+int prog_msg_verdict(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
+{
+	return prog_msg_verdict_common(msg);
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add some tests with new bpf_program__attach_sockmap() APIs

[Yonghong Song]

Add a few more tests in sockmap_basic.c and sockmap_listen.c to
test bpf_link based APIs for SK_MSG and SK_SKB programs.
Link attach/detach/update are all tested.

All tests are passed.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c |  38 +++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c       |  18 +++
 .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c        |  17 ++-
 .../progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c   |   2 +-
 5 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
index 63fb2da7930a..1337153eb0ad 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
@@ -131,6 +131,65 @@ static void test_skmsg_helpers(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 	test_skmsg_load_helpers__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_skmsg_helpers_with_link(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+{
+	struct bpf_program *prog, *prog_clone, *prog_clone2;
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_update_opts, opts);
+	struct test_skmsg_load_helpers *skel;
+	struct bpf_link *link, *link2;
+	int err, map;
+
+	skel = test_skmsg_load_helpers__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_skmsg_load_helpers__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	prog = skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict;
+	prog_clone = skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict_clone;
+	prog_clone2 = skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict_clone2;
+	map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map);
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(prog, map);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since bpf_link for the same prog has been created. */
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), map, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since bpf_link for the same prog type has been created. */
+	link2 = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(prog_clone, map);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link2, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap")) {
+		bpf_link__detach(link2);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, prog_clone);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link__update_program"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since a prog with different type attempts to do update. */
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_link__update_program"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since the old prog does not match the one in the kernel. */
+	opts.old_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog_clone2);
+	opts.flags = BPF_F_REPLACE;
+	err = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog), &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_link_update"))
+		goto out;
+
+	opts.old_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog_clone);
+	opts.flags = BPF_F_REPLACE;
+	err = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog), &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link_update"))
+		goto out;
+out:
+	bpf_link__detach(link);
+	test_skmsg_load_helpers__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static void test_sockmap_update(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 {
 	int err, prog, src;
@@ -298,6 +357,40 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach(enum bpf_attach_type first,
 	test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach__destroy(skel);
 }
 
+static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach_with_link(void)
+{
+	struct test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach *skel;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	int err, map;
+
+	skel = test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
+		return;
+	prog = skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict;
+	map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map);
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(prog, map);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		goto out;
+
+	bpf_link__detach(link);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since attaching with the same prog/map has been done. */
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(prog, map);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		bpf_link__detach(link);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_detach2(bpf_program__fd(prog), map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_detach2"))
+		goto out;
+out:
+	test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static __u32 query_prog_id(int prog_fd)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
@@ -532,6 +625,38 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek(void)
 	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(pass);
 }
 
+static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_with_link(void)
+{
+	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *pass;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	int err, map;
+
+	pass = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pass, "open_and_load"))
+		return;
+	prog = pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict;
+	map = bpf_map__fd(pass->maps.sock_map_rx);
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(prog, map);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, pass->progs.prog_skb_verdict_clone);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link__update_program"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* Fail since a prog with different attach type attempts to do update. */
+	err = bpf_link__update_program(link, pass->progs.prog_skb_parser);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_link__update_program"))
+		goto out;
+
+	test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_helper(map);
+	ASSERT_EQ(pass->bss->clone_called, 1, "clone_called");
+out:
+	bpf_link__detach(link);
+	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(pass);
+}
+
 static void test_sockmap_unconnected_unix(void)
 {
 	int err, map, stream = 0, dgram = 0, zero = 0;
@@ -796,6 +921,8 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach(BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT,
 						BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT);
 	}
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict attach_with_link"))
+		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach_with_link();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap msg_verdict progs query"))
 		test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap stream_parser progs query"))
@@ -812,6 +939,8 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_fionread(false);
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict msg_f_peek"))
 		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap skb_verdict msg_f_peek with link"))
+		test_sockmap_skb_verdict_peek_with_link();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap unconnected af_unix"))
 		test_sockmap_unconnected_unix();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap one socket to many map entries"))
@@ -820,4 +949,8 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
 		test_sockmap_many_maps();
 	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap same socket replace"))
 		test_sockmap_same_sock();
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockmap sk_msg attach sockmap helpers with link"))
+		test_skmsg_helpers_with_link(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
+	if (test__start_subtest("sockhash sk_msg attach sockhash helpers with link"))
+		test_skmsg_helpers_with_link(BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
index a92807bfcd13..54c93eee1808 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
@@ -767,6 +767,24 @@ static void test_msg_redir_to_connected(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel,
 	xbpf_prog_detach2(verdict, sock_map, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT);
 }
 
+static void test_msg_redir_to_connected_with_link(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel,
+						  struct bpf_map *inner_map, int family,
+						  int sotype)
+{
+	struct bpf_program *verdict = skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict;
+	int verdict_map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.verdict_map);
+	int sock_map = bpf_map__fd(inner_map);
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(verdict, sock_map);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		return;
+
+	redir_to_connected(family, sotype, sock_map, verdict_map, REDIR_EGRESS);
+
+	bpf_link__detach(link);
+}
+
 static void redir_to_listening(int family, int sotype, int sock_mapfd,
 			       int verd_mapfd, enum redir_mode mode)
 {
@@ -869,6 +887,24 @@ static void test_msg_redir_to_listening(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel,
 	xbpf_prog_detach2(verdict, sock_map, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT);
 }
 
+static void test_msg_redir_to_listening_with_link(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel,
+						  struct bpf_map *inner_map, int family,
+						  int sotype)
+{
+	struct bpf_program *verdict = skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict;
+	int verdict_map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.verdict_map);
+	int sock_map = bpf_map__fd(inner_map);
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_sockmap(verdict, sock_map);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_sockmap"))
+		return;
+
+	redir_to_listening(family, sotype, sock_map, verdict_map, REDIR_EGRESS);
+
+	bpf_link__detach(link);
+}
+
 static void redir_partial(int family, int sotype, int sock_map, int parser_map)
 {
 	int s, c0 = -1, c1 = -1, p0 = -1, p1 = -1;
@@ -1316,7 +1352,9 @@ static void test_redir(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel, struct bpf_map *map,
 		TEST(test_skb_redir_to_listening),
 		TEST(test_skb_redir_partial),
 		TEST(test_msg_redir_to_connected),
+		TEST(test_msg_redir_to_connected_with_link),
 		TEST(test_msg_redir_to_listening),
+		TEST(test_msg_redir_to_listening_with_link),
 	};
 	const char *family_name, *map_name;
 	const struct redir_test *t;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
index b753672f04c9..996b177324ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skmsg_load_helpers.c
@@ -49,4 +49,22 @@ int prog_msg_verdict(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
 	return prog_msg_verdict_common(msg);
 }
 
+SEC("sk_msg")
+int prog_msg_verdict_clone(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
+{
+	return prog_msg_verdict_common(msg);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+int prog_msg_verdict_clone2(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
+{
+	return prog_msg_verdict_common(msg);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_verdict")
+int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c
index 1d86a717a290..69aacc96db36 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c
@@ -23,10 +23,25 @@ struct {
 	__type(value, int);
 } sock_map_msg SEC(".maps");
 
-SEC("sk_skb")
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_verdict")
 int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	return SK_PASS;
 }
 
+int clone_called;
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_verdict")
+int prog_skb_verdict_clone(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	clone_called = 1;
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb/stream_parser")
+int prog_skb_parser(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return SK_PASS;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c
index 3c69aa971738..d25b0bb30fc0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct {
 	__type(value, __u64);
 } sock_map SEC(".maps");
 
-SEC("sk_skb")
+SEC("sk_skb/verdict")
 int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	return SK_DROP;
-- 
2.43.0