BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot ci <syzbot+ci8e503a0d4aea89ba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
	 martin.lau@linux.dev, yonghong.song@linux.dev
Cc: syzbot@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:57:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68c272e7.050a0220.2ff435.00f3.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911010437.2779173-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v1] bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250911010437.2779173-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/10] bpf: bpf_verifier_state->cleaned flag instead of REG_LIVE_DONE
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/10] bpf: use compute_live_registers() info in clean_func_state
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: remove redundant REG_LIVE_READ check in stacksafe()
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/10] bpf: declare a few utility functions as internal api
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/10] bpf: compute instructions postorder per subprogram
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/10] bpf: callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking using CFG
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/10] bpf: enable callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/10] bpf: signal error if old liveness is more conservative than new
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness
* [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/10] bpf: table based bpf_insn_successors()

and found the following issue:
KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Write in compute_postorder

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/c42e236b-f40c-4d72-8ae7-da4e21c37e17

***

KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Write in compute_postorder

tree:      bpf-next
URL:       https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
base:      e12873ee856ffa6f104869b8ea10c0f741606f13
arch:      amd64
compiler:  Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
config:    https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/6d2bc952-3d65-4bcd-9a84-1207b810a1b5/config
C repro:   https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/338e6ce4-7207-484f-a508-9b00b3121701/c_repro
syz repro: https://ci.syzbot.org/findings/338e6ce4-7207-484f-a508-9b00b3121701/syz_repro

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in compute_postorder+0x802/0xcb0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:17840
Write of size 4 at addr ffff88801f1d4b98 by task syz.0.17/5991

CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5991 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]
 print_report+0xca/0x240 mm/kasan/report.c:482
 kasan_report+0x118/0x150 mm/kasan/report.c:595
 compute_postorder+0x802/0xcb0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:17840
 bpf_check+0x1f90/0x1d440 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:24437
 bpf_prog_load+0x1318/0x1930 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2979
 __sys_bpf+0x528/0x870 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6029
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6139 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6137 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6137
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f366058eba9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffef8486b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f36607d5fa0 RCX: 00007f366058eba9
RDX: 0000000000000070 RSI: 0000200000000440 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f3660611e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f36607d5fa0 R14: 00007f36607d5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
 </TASK>

Allocated by task 5991:
 kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]
 kasan_save_track+0x3e/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68
 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:388 [inline]
 __kasan_kmalloc+0x93/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:405
 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:260 [inline]
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4365 [inline]
 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x30d/0x5f0 mm/slub.c:5052
 kvmalloc_array_node_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1065 [inline]
 compute_postorder+0xd6/0xcb0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:17823
 bpf_check+0x1f90/0x1d440 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:24437
 bpf_prog_load+0x1318/0x1930 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2979
 __sys_bpf+0x528/0x870 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6029
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6139 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6137 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6137
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88801f1d4b80
 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-cg-32 of size 32
The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of
 allocated 24-byte region [ffff88801f1d4b80, ffff88801f1d4b98)

The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff88801f1d4e40 pfn:0x1f1d4
memcg:ffff888026bbb801
flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
page_type: f5(slab)
raw: 00fff00000000000 ffff88801a449b40 dead000000000100 dead000000000122
raw: ffff88801f1d4e40 000000008040003f 00000000f5000000 ffff888026bbb801
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
page_owner tracks the page as allocated
page last allocated via order 0, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52cc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP), pid 532, tgid 532 (kworker/u10:0), ts 5351847364, free_ts 0
 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]
 post_alloc_hook+0x240/0x2a0 mm/page_alloc.c:1851
 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1859 [inline]
 get_page_from_freelist+0x21e4/0x22c0 mm/page_alloc.c:3858
 __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x181/0x370 mm/page_alloc.c:5148
 alloc_pages_mpol+0x232/0x4a0 mm/mempolicy.c:2416
 alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:2487 [inline]
 allocate_slab+0x8a/0x370 mm/slub.c:2655
 new_slab mm/slub.c:2709 [inline]
 ___slab_alloc+0xbeb/0x1410 mm/slub.c:3891
 __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
 __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4056 [inline]
 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4217 [inline]
 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4364 [inline]
 __kmalloc_noprof+0x305/0x4f0 mm/slub.c:4377
 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:909 [inline]
 kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1039 [inline]
 lsm_blob_alloc security/security.c:684 [inline]
 lsm_cred_alloc security/security.c:701 [inline]
 security_prepare_creds+0x52/0x390 security/security.c:3271
 prepare_kernel_cred+0x2ee/0x500 kernel/cred.c:617
 call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0xd0/0x360 kernel/umh.c:88
 ret_from_fork+0x3fc/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
page_owner free stack trace missing

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffff88801f1d4a80: fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc
 ffff88801f1d4b00: 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
>ffff88801f1d4b80: 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
                            ^
 ffff88801f1d4c00: fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
 ffff88801f1d4c80: fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fc fc fc fc
==================================================================


***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
  Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11  1:04 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/10] bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/10] bpf: bpf_verifier_state->cleaned flag instead of REG_LIVE_DONE Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/10] bpf: use compute_live_registers() info in clean_func_state Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: remove redundant REG_LIVE_READ check in stacksafe() Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/10] bpf: declare a few utility functions as internal api Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/10] bpf: compute instructions postorder per subprogram Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/10] bpf: callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking using CFG Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/10] bpf: enable callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/10] bpf: signal error if old liveness is more conservative than new Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 14:19   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-11 21:26     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 22:00       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 22:07         ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-12  8:17   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-12 16:48     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/10] bpf: table based bpf_insn_successors() Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  6:57 ` syzbot ci [this message]
2025-09-11 21:09   ` [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 21:58     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 22:06       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 22:11         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68c272e7.050a0220.2ff435.00f3.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+ci8e503a0d4aea89ba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox