BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
		oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song	 <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:07:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fd0e1fdf651f0728d1daf4fad3d6e4d4c11d221.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKGwghC=+V8u0tSPdkJ1f4usY5LeYUpxnJno=3xW8tYGg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2025-09-11 at 15:00 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

[...]

> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -19297,9 +19297,12 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
> >                          * the precision needs to be propagated back in
> >                          * the current state.
> >                          */
> > -                       if (is_jmp_point(env, env->insn_idx))
> > -                               err = err ? : push_jmp_history(env, cur, 0, 0);
> > -                       err = err ? : propagate_precision(env, &sl->state, cur, NULL);
> > +                       if (is_jmp_point(env, env->insn_idx)) {
> > +                               err = push_jmp_history(env, cur, 0, 0);
> > +                               if (err)
> > +                                       return err;
> > +                       }
> > +                       err = propagate_precision(env, &sl->state, cur, NULL);
> 
> hmm. init err=0 instead and avoid explicit if (err)return err ?

Or like that, yes.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11  1:04 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/10] bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/10] bpf: bpf_verifier_state->cleaned flag instead of REG_LIVE_DONE Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/10] bpf: use compute_live_registers() info in clean_func_state Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/10] bpf: remove redundant REG_LIVE_READ check in stacksafe() Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/10] bpf: declare a few utility functions as internal api Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/10] bpf: compute instructions postorder per subprogram Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/10] bpf: callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking using CFG Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/10] bpf: enable callchain sensitive stack liveness tracking Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/10] bpf: signal error if old liveness is more conservative than new Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/10] bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 14:19   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-11 21:26     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 22:00       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 22:07         ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-09-12  8:17   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-12 16:48     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  1:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/10] bpf: table based bpf_insn_successors() Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11  6:57 ` [syzbot ci] Re: bpf: replace path-sensitive with path-insensitive live stack analysis syzbot ci
2025-09-11 21:09   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 21:58     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-11 22:06       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-09-11 22:11         ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fd0e1fdf651f0728d1daf4fad3d6e4d4c11d221.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox