From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kuifeng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it.
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:53:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8818eaa4-b32c-41a6-82c9-6230d635e89f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHE2DV0RBf9JbkmngsdKdER5F2KmUXwY_JH44Z09DsY0VNa37A@mail.gmail.com>
[ The mailing list got dropped in your reply, so CC back the list ]
On 5/29/24 11:05 PM, Kuifeng Lee wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:51 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/24/24 3:30 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> @@ -832,11 +865,20 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>>> if (ops->test_2)
>>> ops->test_2(4, ops->data);
>>>
>>> + spin_lock(&detach_lock);
>>> + if (!link_to_detach)
>>> + link_to_detach = link;
>>
>> bpf_testmod_ops is used in a few different tests now. Can you check if
>> "./test_progs -j <num_of_parallel_workers>" will work considering link_to_detach
>> here is the very first registered link.
>
> Yes, it works. Since the test in test_struct_ops_modules.c is serial,
> no other test will
> be run simultaneously. And its subtests are run one after another.
just did a quick search on "bpf_map__attach_struct_ops", how about the other
tests like struct_ops_autocreate.c and test_struct_ops_multi_pages.c ?
>
>>
>>> + spin_unlock(&detach_lock);
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 22:30 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/8] Notify user space when a struct_ops object is detached/unregistered Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/8] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29 6:17 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-29 15:04 ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-29 22:38 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-29 23:26 ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: support epoll from bpf struct_ops links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/8] bpf: export bpf_link_inc_not_zero Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops with epoll Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29 22:26 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29 21:51 ` Martin KaFai Lau
[not found] ` <CAHE2DV0RBf9JbkmngsdKdER5F2KmUXwY_JH44Z09DsY0VNa37A@mail.gmail.com>
2024-05-30 17:53 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-05-30 19:34 ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-30 19:42 ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-30 20:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/8] selftests/bpf: make sure bpf_testmod handling racing link destroying well Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/8] bpftool: Change pid_iter.bpf.c to comply with the change of bpf_link_fops Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8818eaa4-b32c-41a6-82c9-6230d635e89f@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox