public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org, sinquersw@gmail.com,
	kuifeng@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it.
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:51:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0b0e283-9312-4f11-9636-2ea690262180@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240524223036.318800-7-thinker.li@gmail.com>

On 5/24/24 3:30 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> @@ -832,11 +865,20 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>   	if (ops->test_2)
>   		ops->test_2(4, ops->data);
>   
> +	spin_lock(&detach_lock);
> +	if (!link_to_detach)
> +		link_to_detach = link;

bpf_testmod_ops is used in a few different tests now. Can you check if 
"./test_progs -j <num_of_parallel_workers>" will work considering link_to_detach 
here is the very first registered link.

> +	spin_unlock(&detach_lock);
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-24 22:30 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/8] Notify user space when a struct_ops object is detached/unregistered Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/8] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29  6:17   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-29 15:04     ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-29 22:38       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-29 23:26         ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: support epoll from bpf struct_ops links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/8] bpf: export bpf_link_inc_not_zero Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/8] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops with epoll Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29 22:26   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-29 21:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CAHE2DV0RBf9JbkmngsdKdER5F2KmUXwY_JH44Z09DsY0VNa37A@mail.gmail.com>
2024-05-30 17:53       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-30 19:34         ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-30 19:42           ` Kuifeng Lee
2024-05-30 20:19             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/8] selftests/bpf: make sure bpf_testmod handling racing link destroying well Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-24 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/8] bpftool: Change pid_iter.bpf.c to comply with the change of bpf_link_fops Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0b0e283-9312-4f11-9636-2ea690262180@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox