* [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type()
@ 2024-07-11 14:58 Tengda Wu
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT Tengda Wu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tengda Wu @ 2024-07-11 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
hffilwlqm
Hi,
This patchset is going to fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type()
for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT.
`prog->aux->dst_prog` in resolve_prog_type() is assigned by
`attach_prog_fd`, and would be NULL if `attach_prog_fd` is not
provided. Loading EXT prog with bpf_dynptr_from_skb() kfunc call
in this way will lead to null-pointer-deref.
In last version we fix it by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty
at load time, which leads to libbpf_probe_prog_types() api broken.
Currently, we fix it by just adding null check for EXT prog in
resolve_prog_type() as the old way did.
For the sake of safety, we compared the full test logs of selftest
before and after applying these changes, and the results show that
the two test logs were consistent.
Best regards,
Tengda
Change list:
v4:
- Fix by add null check in resolve_prog_type() which can avoid
libbpf_probe_prog_types api breaking.
v3:
- Add a small selftest for the BPF CI, and split 1-patch into
3-patch series as recommended by Daniel.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/d16b4f29-8966-464f-b530-35e39fda3f46@huaweicloud.com/
v2:
- Fix libbpf_probe_prog_types test failure reported by CI by
adapting libbpf code. (thanks for jirka's reminder)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240620060701.1465291-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com/
Tengda Wu (2):
bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for
BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT
selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in
resolve_prog_type()
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT
2024-07-11 14:58 [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
@ 2024-07-11 14:58 ` Tengda Wu
2024-07-23 14:13 ` Leon Hwang
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
2024-07-12 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tengda Wu @ 2024-07-11 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
hffilwlqm
When loading a EXT program without specifying `attr->attach_prog_fd`,
the `prog->aux->dst_prog` will be null. At this time, calling
resolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.
Example stack trace:
[ 8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004
[ 8.108262] Mem abort info:
[ 8.108384] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ 8.108547] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 8.108722] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 8.108827] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 8.108939] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 8.109102] Data abort info:
[ 8.109203] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 8.109399] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 8.109614] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000
[ 8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
[ 8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 8.112783] Modules linked in:
[ 8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1
[ 8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
[ 8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8
[ 8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0
[ 8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001
[ 8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000
[ 8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[ 8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720
[ 8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720
[ 8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4
[ 8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f
[ 8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c
[ 8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 8.114126] Call trace:
[ 8.114159] may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
[ 8.114202] bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0
[ 8.114214] bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58
[ 8.114227] __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250
[ 8.114240] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40
[ 8.114254] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0
[ 8.114273] do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8
[ 8.114289] el0_svc+0x3c/0x140
[ 8.114305] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
[ 8.114331] el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170
[ 8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403)
[ 8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
One way to fix it is by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty when
bpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to `libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type`
API broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log
nothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().
Another way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().
The issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to
prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT") which wanted
to correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before
that, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows
the logic below:
prog->aux->dst_prog ? prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
It implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to `dst_prog`,
the prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.
So just keep using it.
Fix this by returning `prog->type` for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if `dst_prog`
is not present in resolve_prog_type().
Fixes: 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.18+
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index e4070fb02b11..ff2a6cdb1fa3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static inline u32 type_flag(u32 type)
/* only use after check_attach_btf_id() */
static inline enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT ?
+ return (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT && prog->aux->dst_prog) ?
prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in resolve_prog_type()
2024-07-11 14:58 [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT Tengda Wu
@ 2024-07-11 14:58 ` Tengda Wu
2024-07-12 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tengda Wu @ 2024-07-11 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa,
hffilwlqm
This test verifies that resolve_prog_type() works as expected when
`attach_prog_fd` is not passed in.
`prog->aux->dst_prog` in resolve_prog_type() is assigned by
`attach_prog_fd`, and would be NULL if `attach_prog_fd` is not provided.
Loading EXT prog with bpf_dynptr_from_skb() kfunc call in this way will
lead to null-pointer-deref.
Verify that the null-pointer-deref bug in resolve_prog_type() is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index ab25a81fd3a1..f9d6023042d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -275,6 +275,19 @@
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
+{
+ "calls: invalid kfunc call: must provide (attach_prog_fd, btf_id) pair when freplace",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "Tracing programs must provide btf_id",
+ .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = {
+ { "bpf_dynptr_from_skb", 0 },
+ },
+},
{
"calls: basic sanity",
.insns = {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type()
2024-07-11 14:58 [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT Tengda Wu
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
@ 2024-07-12 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-07-12 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tengda Wu
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87,
song, yonghong.song, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, hffilwlqm
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:58:17 +0800 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset is going to fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type()
> for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT.
>
> `prog->aux->dst_prog` in resolve_prog_type() is assigned by
> `attach_prog_fd`, and would be NULL if `attach_prog_fd` is not
> provided. Loading EXT prog with bpf_dynptr_from_skb() kfunc call
> in this way will lead to null-pointer-deref.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf,v4,1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f7866c358733
- [bpf,v4,2/2] selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in resolve_prog_type()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e435b043d89a
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT Tengda Wu
@ 2024-07-23 14:13 ` Leon Hwang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2024-07-23 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tengda Wu, bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, John Fastabend,
Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard Zingerman, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa
On 2024/7/11 22:58, Tengda Wu wrote:
> When loading a EXT program without specifying `attr->attach_prog_fd`,
> the `prog->aux->dst_prog` will be null. At this time, calling
> resolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.
>
> Example stack trace:
>
> [ 8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004
> [ 8.108262] Mem abort info:
> [ 8.108384] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
> [ 8.108547] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [ 8.108722] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [ 8.108827] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [ 8.108939] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> [ 8.109102] Data abort info:
> [ 8.109203] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> [ 8.109399] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> [ 8.109614] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> [ 8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000
> [ 8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
> [ 8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 8.112783] Modules linked in:
> [ 8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1
> [ 8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
> [ 8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8
> [ 8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0
> [ 8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001
> [ 8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
> [ 8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000
> [ 8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720
> [ 8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720
> [ 8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4
> [ 8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f
> [ 8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c
> [ 8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [ 8.114126] Call trace:
> [ 8.114159] may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0
> [ 8.114202] bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0
> [ 8.114214] bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58
> [ 8.114227] __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250
> [ 8.114240] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40
> [ 8.114254] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0
> [ 8.114273] do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8
> [ 8.114289] el0_svc+0x3c/0x140
> [ 8.114305] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
> [ 8.114331] el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170
> [ 8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403)
> [ 8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> One way to fix it is by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty when
> bpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to `libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type`
> API broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log
> nothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().
>
> Another way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().
>
> The issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to
> prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT") which wanted
> to correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before
> that, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows
> the logic below:
>
> prog->aux->dst_prog ? prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
>
> It implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to `dst_prog`,
> the prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.
> So just keep using it.
>
> Fix this by returning `prog->type` for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if `dst_prog`
> is not present in resolve_prog_type().
>
> Fixes: 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.18+
> Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index e4070fb02b11..ff2a6cdb1fa3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static inline u32 type_flag(u32 type)
> /* only use after check_attach_btf_id() */
> static inline enum bpf_prog_type resolve_prog_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> {
> - return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT ?
> + return (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT && prog->aux->dst_prog) ?
> prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
> }
>
It seems not good enough here.
When I want to update an attached freplace prog to PROG_ARRAY map, it
will fail, like this selftest[0]. In this selftest, there is a
PROG_ARRAY map in freplace prog. And when loading with freplace's target
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS prog, PROG_ARRAY map owner type is set as
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS. Next, after attaching freplace prog, when I
want to update the freplace prog, it will fail because
resolve_prog_type() returns BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT (because freplace
prog->aux->dst_prog is NULL after attaching).
When to run the selftest:
./test_progs -v -t tailcalls/tailcall_freplace
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open tc_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:tc_skel entry prog_id 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:load fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:attatch_freplace 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel entry prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel jmp_table map_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:FAIL:update jmp_table unexpected error: -22
(errno 22)
#327/25 tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:FAIL
It is better to fix by my way[1], which passes all selftests[2].
When to run the selftest with my way:
./test_progs -v -t tailcalls/tailcall_freplace
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:open tc_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:tc_skel entry prog_id 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:set_attach_target 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:load fr_skel 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:attatch_freplace 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel entry prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:fr_skel jmp_table map_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:update jmp_table 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:prog_fd 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:test_run 0 nsec
test_tailcall_freplace:PASS:test_run retval 0 nsec
#327/25 tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:OK
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240602122421.50892-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240602122421.50892-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/7432/checks
Thanks,
Leon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-23 14:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-11 14:58 [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 1/2] bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT Tengda Wu
2024-07-23 14:13 ` Leon Hwang
2024-07-11 14:58 ` [PATCH bpf v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test for null-pointer-deref bugfix in resolve_prog_type() Tengda Wu
2024-07-12 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf v4 0/2] bpf: Fix null-pointer-deref " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox