* [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field
@ 2023-01-27 22:45 Dave Thaler
2023-02-08 2:43 ` David Vernet
2023-02-08 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Thaler @ 2023-01-27 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf; +Cc: bpf, Dave Thaler
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Use consistent names for the same field, e.g., 'dst' vs 'dst_reg'.
Previously a mix of terms were used for the same thing in various cases.
Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
---
V3 -> V4: per David Vernet, minimize column widths
V2 -> V3: per David Vernet, added bolding and updated terms for reg numbers
V1 -> V2: addressed comments from Alexei and Stanislav
---
Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 113 ++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 2d3fe59bd26..c1c17ee60ec 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -30,20 +30,56 @@ Instruction encoding
eBPF has two instruction encodings:
* the basic instruction encoding, which uses 64 bits to encode an instruction
-* the wide instruction encoding, which appends a second 64-bit immediate value
- (imm64) after the basic instruction for a total of 128 bits.
+* the wide instruction encoding, which appends a second 64-bit immediate (i.e.,
+ constant) value after the basic instruction for a total of 128 bits.
-The basic instruction encoding looks as follows:
+The basic instruction encoding is as follows, where MSB and LSB mean the most significant
+bits and least significant bits, respectively:
-============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
-32 bits (MSB) 16 bits 4 bits 4 bits 8 bits (LSB)
-============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
-immediate offset source register destination register opcode
-============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
+============= ======= ======= ======= ============
+32 bits (MSB) 16 bits 4 bits 4 bits 8 bits (LSB)
+============= ======= ======= ======= ============
+imm offset src_reg dst_reg opcode
+============= ======= ======= ======= ============
+
+**imm**
+ signed integer immediate value
+
+**offset**
+ signed integer offset used with pointer arithmetic
+
+**src_reg**
+ the source register number (0-10), except where otherwise specified
+ (`64-bit immediate instructions`_ reuse this field for other purposes)
+
+**dst_reg**
+ destination register number (0-10)
+
+**opcode**
+ operation to perform
Note that most instructions do not use all of the fields.
Unused fields shall be cleared to zero.
+As discussed below in `64-bit immediate instructions`_, a 64-bit immediate
+instruction uses a 64-bit immediate value that is constructed as follows.
+The 64 bits following the basic instruction contain a pseudo instruction
+using the same format but with opcode, dst_reg, src_reg, and offset all set to zero,
+and imm containing the high 32 bits of the immediate value.
+
+================= ==================
+64 bits (MSB) 64 bits (LSB)
+================= ==================
+basic instruction pseudo instruction
+================= ==================
+
+Thus the 64-bit immediate value is constructed as follows:
+
+ imm64 = (next_imm << 32) | imm
+
+where 'next_imm' refers to the imm value of the pseudo instruction
+following the basic instruction.
+
Instruction classes
-------------------
@@ -71,27 +107,32 @@ For arithmetic and jump instructions (``BPF_ALU``, ``BPF_ALU64``, ``BPF_JMP`` an
============== ====== =================
4 bits (MSB) 1 bit 3 bits (LSB)
============== ====== =================
-operation code source instruction class
+code source instruction class
============== ====== =================
-The 4th bit encodes the source operand:
+**code**
+ the operation code, whose meaning varies by instruction class
- ====== ===== ========================================
- source value description
- ====== ===== ========================================
- BPF_K 0x00 use 32-bit immediate as source operand
- BPF_X 0x08 use 'src_reg' register as source operand
- ====== ===== ========================================
+**source**
+ the source operand location, which unless otherwise specified is one of:
-The four MSB bits store the operation code.
+ ====== ===== ==============================================
+ source value description
+ ====== ===== ==============================================
+ BPF_K 0x00 use 32-bit 'imm' value as source operand
+ BPF_X 0x08 use 'src_reg' register value as source operand
+ ====== ===== ==============================================
+**instruction class**
+ the instruction class (see `Instruction classes`_)
Arithmetic instructions
-----------------------
``BPF_ALU`` uses 32-bit wide operands while ``BPF_ALU64`` uses 64-bit wide operands for
otherwise identical operations.
-The 'code' field encodes the operation as below:
+The 'code' field encodes the operation as below, where 'src' and 'dst' refer
+to the values of the source and destination registers, respectively.
======== ===== ==========================================================
code value description
@@ -121,19 +162,19 @@ the destination register is unchanged whereas for ``BPF_ALU`` the upper
``BPF_ADD | BPF_X | BPF_ALU`` means::
- dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg + (u32) src_reg;
+ dst = (u32) ((u32) dst + (u32) src)
``BPF_ADD | BPF_X | BPF_ALU64`` means::
- dst_reg = dst_reg + src_reg
+ dst = dst + src
``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU`` means::
- dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg ^ (u32) imm32
+ dst = (u32) dst ^ (u32) imm32
``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU64`` means::
- dst_reg = dst_reg ^ imm32
+ dst = dst ^ imm32
Also note that the division and modulo operations are unsigned. Thus, for
``BPF_ALU``, 'imm' is first interpreted as an unsigned 32-bit value, whereas
@@ -167,11 +208,11 @@ Examples:
``BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_LE | BPF_END`` with imm = 16 means::
- dst_reg = htole16(dst_reg)
+ dst = htole16(dst)
``BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END`` with imm = 64 means::
- dst_reg = htobe64(dst_reg)
+ dst = htobe64(dst)
Jump instructions
-----------------
@@ -246,15 +287,15 @@ instructions that transfer data between a register and memory.
``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_STX`` means::
- *(size *) (dst_reg + off) = src_reg
+ *(size *) (dst + offset) = src
``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_ST`` means::
- *(size *) (dst_reg + off) = imm32
+ *(size *) (dst + offset) = imm32
``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_LDX`` means::
- dst_reg = *(size *) (src_reg + off)
+ dst = *(size *) (src + offset)
Where size is one of: ``BPF_B``, ``BPF_H``, ``BPF_W``, or ``BPF_DW``.
@@ -288,11 +329,11 @@ BPF_XOR 0xa0 atomic xor
``BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W | BPF_STX`` with 'imm' = BPF_ADD means::
- *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg
+ *(u32 *)(dst + offset) += src
``BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_STX`` with 'imm' = BPF ADD means::
- *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg
+ *(u64 *)(dst + offset) += src
In addition to the simple atomic operations, there also is a modifier and
two complex atomic operations:
@@ -307,16 +348,16 @@ BPF_CMPXCHG 0xf0 | BPF_FETCH atomic compare and exchange
The ``BPF_FETCH`` modifier is optional for simple atomic operations, and
always set for the complex atomic operations. If the ``BPF_FETCH`` flag
-is set, then the operation also overwrites ``src_reg`` with the value that
+is set, then the operation also overwrites ``src`` with the value that
was in memory before it was modified.
-The ``BPF_XCHG`` operation atomically exchanges ``src_reg`` with the value
-addressed by ``dst_reg + off``.
+The ``BPF_XCHG`` operation atomically exchanges ``src`` with the value
+addressed by ``dst + offset``.
The ``BPF_CMPXCHG`` operation atomically compares the value addressed by
-``dst_reg + off`` with ``R0``. If they match, the value addressed by
-``dst_reg + off`` is replaced with ``src_reg``. In either case, the
-value that was at ``dst_reg + off`` before the operation is zero-extended
+``dst + offset`` with ``R0``. If they match, the value addressed by
+``dst + offset`` is replaced with ``src``. In either case, the
+value that was at ``dst + offset`` before the operation is zero-extended
and loaded back to ``R0``.
64-bit immediate instructions
@@ -329,7 +370,7 @@ There is currently only one such instruction.
``BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM`` means::
- dst_reg = imm64
+ dst = imm64
Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
--
2.33.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field
2023-01-27 22:45 [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field Dave Thaler
@ 2023-02-08 2:43 ` David Vernet
2023-02-08 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Vernet @ 2023-02-08 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Thaler; +Cc: bpf, bpf, Dave Thaler
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:45:55PM +0000, Dave Thaler wrote:
> From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
>
> Use consistent names for the same field, e.g., 'dst' vs 'dst_reg'.
> Previously a mix of terms were used for the same thing in various cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Looks great, thanks Dave!
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
> V3 -> V4: per David Vernet, minimize column widths
>
> V2 -> V3: per David Vernet, added bolding and updated terms for reg numbers
>
> V1 -> V2: addressed comments from Alexei and Stanislav
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 113 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> index 2d3fe59bd26..c1c17ee60ec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -30,20 +30,56 @@ Instruction encoding
> eBPF has two instruction encodings:
>
> * the basic instruction encoding, which uses 64 bits to encode an instruction
> -* the wide instruction encoding, which appends a second 64-bit immediate value
> - (imm64) after the basic instruction for a total of 128 bits.
> +* the wide instruction encoding, which appends a second 64-bit immediate (i.e.,
> + constant) value after the basic instruction for a total of 128 bits.
>
> -The basic instruction encoding looks as follows:
> +The basic instruction encoding is as follows, where MSB and LSB mean the most significant
> +bits and least significant bits, respectively:
>
> -============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
> -32 bits (MSB) 16 bits 4 bits 4 bits 8 bits (LSB)
> -============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
> -immediate offset source register destination register opcode
> -============= ======= =============== ==================== ============
> +============= ======= ======= ======= ============
> +32 bits (MSB) 16 bits 4 bits 4 bits 8 bits (LSB)
> +============= ======= ======= ======= ============
> +imm offset src_reg dst_reg opcode
> +============= ======= ======= ======= ============
> +
> +**imm**
> + signed integer immediate value
> +
> +**offset**
> + signed integer offset used with pointer arithmetic
> +
> +**src_reg**
> + the source register number (0-10), except where otherwise specified
> + (`64-bit immediate instructions`_ reuse this field for other purposes)
> +
> +**dst_reg**
> + destination register number (0-10)
> +
> +**opcode**
> + operation to perform
>
> Note that most instructions do not use all of the fields.
> Unused fields shall be cleared to zero.
>
> +As discussed below in `64-bit immediate instructions`_, a 64-bit immediate
> +instruction uses a 64-bit immediate value that is constructed as follows.
> +The 64 bits following the basic instruction contain a pseudo instruction
> +using the same format but with opcode, dst_reg, src_reg, and offset all set to zero,
> +and imm containing the high 32 bits of the immediate value.
> +
> +================= ==================
> +64 bits (MSB) 64 bits (LSB)
> +================= ==================
> +basic instruction pseudo instruction
> +================= ==================
> +
> +Thus the 64-bit immediate value is constructed as follows:
> +
> + imm64 = (next_imm << 32) | imm
> +
> +where 'next_imm' refers to the imm value of the pseudo instruction
> +following the basic instruction.
> +
> Instruction classes
> -------------------
>
> @@ -71,27 +107,32 @@ For arithmetic and jump instructions (``BPF_ALU``, ``BPF_ALU64``, ``BPF_JMP`` an
> ============== ====== =================
> 4 bits (MSB) 1 bit 3 bits (LSB)
> ============== ====== =================
> -operation code source instruction class
> +code source instruction class
> ============== ====== =================
>
> -The 4th bit encodes the source operand:
> +**code**
> + the operation code, whose meaning varies by instruction class
>
> - ====== ===== ========================================
> - source value description
> - ====== ===== ========================================
> - BPF_K 0x00 use 32-bit immediate as source operand
> - BPF_X 0x08 use 'src_reg' register as source operand
> - ====== ===== ========================================
> +**source**
> + the source operand location, which unless otherwise specified is one of:
>
> -The four MSB bits store the operation code.
> + ====== ===== ==============================================
> + source value description
> + ====== ===== ==============================================
> + BPF_K 0x00 use 32-bit 'imm' value as source operand
> + BPF_X 0x08 use 'src_reg' register value as source operand
> + ====== ===== ==============================================
>
> +**instruction class**
> + the instruction class (see `Instruction classes`_)
>
> Arithmetic instructions
> -----------------------
>
> ``BPF_ALU`` uses 32-bit wide operands while ``BPF_ALU64`` uses 64-bit wide operands for
> otherwise identical operations.
> -The 'code' field encodes the operation as below:
> +The 'code' field encodes the operation as below, where 'src' and 'dst' refer
> +to the values of the source and destination registers, respectively.
>
> ======== ===== ==========================================================
> code value description
> @@ -121,19 +162,19 @@ the destination register is unchanged whereas for ``BPF_ALU`` the upper
>
> ``BPF_ADD | BPF_X | BPF_ALU`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg + (u32) src_reg;
> + dst = (u32) ((u32) dst + (u32) src)
>
> ``BPF_ADD | BPF_X | BPF_ALU64`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = dst_reg + src_reg
> + dst = dst + src
>
> ``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = (u32) dst_reg ^ (u32) imm32
> + dst = (u32) dst ^ (u32) imm32
>
> ``BPF_XOR | BPF_K | BPF_ALU64`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = dst_reg ^ imm32
> + dst = dst ^ imm32
>
> Also note that the division and modulo operations are unsigned. Thus, for
> ``BPF_ALU``, 'imm' is first interpreted as an unsigned 32-bit value, whereas
> @@ -167,11 +208,11 @@ Examples:
>
> ``BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_LE | BPF_END`` with imm = 16 means::
>
> - dst_reg = htole16(dst_reg)
> + dst = htole16(dst)
>
> ``BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END`` with imm = 64 means::
>
> - dst_reg = htobe64(dst_reg)
> + dst = htobe64(dst)
>
> Jump instructions
> -----------------
> @@ -246,15 +287,15 @@ instructions that transfer data between a register and memory.
>
> ``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_STX`` means::
>
> - *(size *) (dst_reg + off) = src_reg
> + *(size *) (dst + offset) = src
>
> ``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_ST`` means::
>
> - *(size *) (dst_reg + off) = imm32
> + *(size *) (dst + offset) = imm32
>
> ``BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_LDX`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = *(size *) (src_reg + off)
> + dst = *(size *) (src + offset)
>
> Where size is one of: ``BPF_B``, ``BPF_H``, ``BPF_W``, or ``BPF_DW``.
>
> @@ -288,11 +329,11 @@ BPF_XOR 0xa0 atomic xor
>
> ``BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W | BPF_STX`` with 'imm' = BPF_ADD means::
>
> - *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg
> + *(u32 *)(dst + offset) += src
>
> ``BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_STX`` with 'imm' = BPF ADD means::
>
> - *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg
> + *(u64 *)(dst + offset) += src
>
> In addition to the simple atomic operations, there also is a modifier and
> two complex atomic operations:
> @@ -307,16 +348,16 @@ BPF_CMPXCHG 0xf0 | BPF_FETCH atomic compare and exchange
>
> The ``BPF_FETCH`` modifier is optional for simple atomic operations, and
> always set for the complex atomic operations. If the ``BPF_FETCH`` flag
> -is set, then the operation also overwrites ``src_reg`` with the value that
> +is set, then the operation also overwrites ``src`` with the value that
> was in memory before it was modified.
>
> -The ``BPF_XCHG`` operation atomically exchanges ``src_reg`` with the value
> -addressed by ``dst_reg + off``.
> +The ``BPF_XCHG`` operation atomically exchanges ``src`` with the value
> +addressed by ``dst + offset``.
>
> The ``BPF_CMPXCHG`` operation atomically compares the value addressed by
> -``dst_reg + off`` with ``R0``. If they match, the value addressed by
> -``dst_reg + off`` is replaced with ``src_reg``. In either case, the
> -value that was at ``dst_reg + off`` before the operation is zero-extended
> +``dst + offset`` with ``R0``. If they match, the value addressed by
> +``dst + offset`` is replaced with ``src``. In either case, the
> +value that was at ``dst + offset`` before the operation is zero-extended
> and loaded back to ``R0``.
>
> 64-bit immediate instructions
> @@ -329,7 +370,7 @@ There is currently only one such instruction.
>
> ``BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM`` means::
>
> - dst_reg = imm64
> + dst = imm64
>
>
> Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
> --
> 2.33.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field
2023-01-27 22:45 [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field Dave Thaler
2023-02-08 2:43 ` David Vernet
@ 2023-02-08 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2023-02-08 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Thaler; +Cc: bpf, bpf, dthaler
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:45:55 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
>
> Use consistent names for the same field, e.g., 'dst' vs 'dst_reg'.
> Previously a mix of terms were used for the same thing in various cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a92adde8d3d4
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-08 2:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-27 22:45 [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field Dave Thaler
2023-02-08 2:43 ` David Vernet
2023-02-08 2:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox