* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range
@ 2022-09-08 23:07 Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-08 23:45 ` sdf
2022-09-11 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Marchevsky @ 2022-09-08 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Kernel Team,
Joanne Koong, Dave Marchevsky
Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was
added in commit 69c087ba6225b ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper").
At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop
iteration.
In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as
those added in rbtree series[0] and others, add a callback_ret_range to
bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also
set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return
value bounds.
Default to tnum_range(0, 0) instead of using tnum_unknown as a sentinel
value as the latter would prevent the valid range (0, U64_MAX) being
used. Previous global default tnum_range(0, 1) is explicitly set for
extant callback helpers. The change to global default was made after
discussion around this patch in rbtree series [1], goal here is to make
it more obvious that callback_ret_range should be explicitly set.
[0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
[1]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
---
Sending this separately from rbtree patchset as Joanne also needs this
change for her usecase.
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index b49a349cc6ae..e197f8fb27e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct bpf_func_state {
*/
u32 async_entry_cnt;
bool in_callback_fn;
+ struct tnum callback_ret_range;
bool in_async_callback_fn;
/* The following fields should be last. See copy_func_state() */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index c0f175ac187a..ac0cb88e452a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
state->callsite = callsite;
state->frameno = frameno;
state->subprogno = subprogno;
+ state->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 0);
init_reg_state(env, state);
mark_verifier_state_scratched(env);
}
@@ -6789,6 +6790,7 @@ static int set_map_elem_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return err;
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6810,6 +6812,7 @@ static int set_loop_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6839,6 +6842,7 @@ static int set_timer_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_async_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6866,6 +6870,7 @@ static int set_find_vma_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6893,7 +6898,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
/* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
- struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ struct tnum range = callee->callback_ret_range;
if (r0->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
verbose(env, "R0 not a scalar value\n");
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range
2022-09-08 23:07 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range Dave Marchevsky
@ 2022-09-08 23:45 ` sdf
2022-09-11 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sdf @ 2022-09-08 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Marchevsky
Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Kernel Team, Joanne Koong
On 09/08, Dave Marchevsky wrote:
> Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was
> added in commit 69c087ba6225b ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper").
> At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop
> iteration.
> In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as
> those added in rbtree series[0] and others, add a callback_ret_range to
> bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also
> set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return
> value bounds.
> Default to tnum_range(0, 0) instead of using tnum_unknown as a sentinel
> value as the latter would prevent the valid range (0, U64_MAX) being
> used. Previous global default tnum_range(0, 1) is explicitly set for
> extant callback helpers. The change to global default was made after
> discussion around this patch in rbtree series [1], goal here is to make
> it more obvious that callback_ret_range should be explicitly set.
> [0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
> [1]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
> ---
> Sending this separately from rbtree patchset as Joanne also needs this
> change for her usecase.
Not sure you need that given everybody's happy about it in the separate
thread, but for the sake of completion:
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range
2022-09-08 23:07 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-08 23:45 ` sdf
@ 2022-09-11 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-09-11 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Marchevsky; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, kernel-team, joannelkoong
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:07:16 -0700 you wrote:
> Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was
> added in commit 69c087ba6225b ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper").
> At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop
> iteration.
>
> In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as
> those added in rbtree series[0] and others, add a callback_ret_range to
> bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also
> set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return
> value bounds.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1bfe26fb0827
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-11 1:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-08 23:07 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-08 23:45 ` sdf
2022-09-11 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox