BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, masahiroy@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] samples/bpf: remove unnecessary -I flags from libbpf EXTRA_CFLAGS
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 21:00:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z06Qbsh7Elx7psRx@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af043dde50045c5fbce2564130b9b9105b12eeec.camel@gmail.com>

On 12/02, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 17:44 -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 16:52 -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > Naive question: why pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to libbpf at all? Can we drop it?
> > > 
> > > This was added by the commit [0].
> > > As far as I understand, the idea is to pass the following flags:
> > > 
> > >     ifeq ($(ARCH), arm)
> > >     # Strip all except -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ option needed to handle linux
> > >     # headers when arm instruction set identification is requested.
> > >     ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR := $(filter -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__%, $(KBUILD_CFLAGS))
> > >     ...
> > >     TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR)
> > >     endif
> > > 
> > >     ifeq ($(ARCH), mips)
> > >     TPROGS_CFLAGS += -D__SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__
> > >     ...
> > >     endif
> > > 
> > > Not sure if these are still necessary.
> > > 
> > > [0] commit d8ceae91e9f0 ("samples/bpf: Provide C/LDFLAGS to libbpf")
> > > 
> > 
> > But this means that I should include sysroot part in the COMMON_CFLAGS.
> > I'll get the arm cross-compilation environment and double check.
> > 
> 
> So, I tested build as follows:
> - setup a debian chroot for 'testing';
> - added gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain and dependencies necessary
>   for kernel build (as in [0]) + clang-18 + qemu-system-arm + qemu-user-static;
> - cross-compiled kernel for ARM inside that chroot:
>   $ ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make olddefconfig
>   $ ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- make -j
> - prepared an ARM sysroot (again, debian 'testing'):
>   $ debootstrap --arch armhf --variant=buildd testing \
>       /some/dir/trixie-armhf http://deb.debian.org/debian
>   (and installed libelf-dev inside chroot)
> - compiled samples with the following command:
>   $ CLANG=clang-18 LLC=llc-18 OPT=opt-18 LLVM_DIS=llvm-dis-18 \
>     LLVM_OBJCOPY=llvm-objcopy-18 LLVM_READELF=llvm-readelf-18 \
>     ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- \
>     SYSROOT=/some/dir/trixie-armhf/ \
>     make M=samples/bpf
> 
> [0] https://docs.kernel.org/bpf/s390.html
> 
> The compilation finishes successfully with and without EXTRA_CFLAGS
> passed to libbpf build. When EXTRA_CFLAGS are passed, I don't see any
> -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__% flags passed to libbpf build.
> 
> Still, I'm hesitant to remove this flag, I'd prefer to post a v3
> covering sysroot flag and be done with this. E.g. as below:
> 
> --- 8< ----------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index bcf103a4c14f..96a05e70ace3 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -146,13 +146,14 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH), x86)
>  BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS += -fcf-protection
>  endif
>  
> -TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
> -TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes
> -TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
> -TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(call try-run,\
> +COMMON_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
> +COMMON_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes
> +COMMON_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
> +COMMON_CFLAGS += $(call try-run,\
>         printf "int main() { return 0; }" |\
>         $(CC) -Werror -fsanitize=bounds -x c - -o "$$TMP",-fsanitize=bounds,)
>  
> +TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(COMMON_CFLAGS)
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE)
> @@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/lib
>  TPROGS_CFLAGS += -DHAVE_ATTR_TEST=0
>  
>  ifdef SYSROOT
> -TPROGS_CFLAGS += --sysroot=$(SYSROOT)
> +COMMON_CFLAGS += --sysroot=$(SYSROOT)
>  TPROGS_LDFLAGS := -L$(SYSROOT)/usr/lib
>  endif
>  
> @@ -229,7 +230,7 @@ clean:
>  
>  $(LIBBPF): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) | $(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)
>  # Fix up variables inherited from Kbuild that tools/ build system won't like
> -       $(MAKE) -C $(LIBBPF_SRC) RM='rm -rf' EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(TPROGS_CFLAGS)" \
> +       $(MAKE) -C $(LIBBPF_SRC) RM='rm -rf' EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(COMMON_CFLAGS)" \
>                 LDFLAGS="$(TPROGS_LDFLAGS)" srctree=$(BPF_SAMPLES_PATH)/../../ \
>                 O= OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUTPUT)/ DESTDIR=$(LIBBPF_DESTDIR) prefix= \
>                 $@ install_headers
> ---------------------------------------------------- >8 ---
> 
> (and maybe peek a better name for COMMON_CFLAGS).
> 

Agreed, let's go with what you have (especially since you've tested it).
The samples are mostly deprecated / in maintenance mode anyway.

Feel free to slap:
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-02 23:47 [PATCH bpf v2] samples/bpf: remove unnecessary -I flags from libbpf EXTRA_CFLAGS Eduard Zingerman
2024-12-03  0:23 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-12-03  0:52   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-12-03  1:44     ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-12-03  4:50       ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-12-03  5:00         ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z06Qbsh7Elx7psRx@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox