[PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[Jiri Olsa]

Anastasios reported crash on stable 5.15 kernel with following
bpf attached to lsm hook:

  SEC("lsm.s/bprm_creds_for_exec")
  int BPF_PROG(bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
  {
          struct path *path = &bprm->executable->f_path;
          char p[128] = { 0 };

          bpf_d_path(path, p, 128);
          return 0;
  }

but bprm->executable can be NULL, so bpf_d_path call will crash:

  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
  ...
  RIP: 0010:d_path+0x22/0x280
  ...
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   bpf_d_path+0x21/0x60
   bpf_prog_db9cf176e84498d9_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x94/0x99
   bpf_trampoline_6442506293_0+0x55/0x1000
   bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x5/0x10
   security_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x29/0x40
   bprm_execve+0x1c1/0x900
   do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1af/0x260
   __x64_sys_execve+0x32/0x40

It's problem for all stable trees with bpf_d_path helper, which was
added in 5.9.

This issue is fixed in current bpf code, where we identify and mark
trusted pointers, so the above code would fail to load.

For the sake of the stable trees and to workaround potentially broken
verifier in the future, adding the code that reads the path object from
the passed pointer and verifies it's valid in kernel space.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
Fixes: 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 9a050e36dc6c..aecd98ee73dc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -900,12 +900,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
 
 BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
 {
+	struct path copy;
 	long len;
 	char *p;
 
 	if (!sz)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * The path pointer is verified as trusted and safe to use,
+	 * but let's double check it's valid anyway to workaround
+	 * potentially broken verifier.
+	 */
+	len = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&copy, path, sizeof(*path));
+	if (len < 0)
+		return len;
+
 	p = d_path(path, buf, sz);
 	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
 		len = PTR_ERR(p);
-- 
2.40.1

Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On 06/04, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Anastasios reported crash on stable 5.15 kernel with following
> bpf attached to lsm hook:
> 
>   SEC("lsm.s/bprm_creds_for_exec")
>   int BPF_PROG(bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>   {
>           struct path *path = &bprm->executable->f_path;
>           char p[128] = { 0 };
> 
>           bpf_d_path(path, p, 128);
>           return 0;
>   }
> 
> but bprm->executable can be NULL, so bpf_d_path call will crash:
> 
>   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
>   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>   PGD 0 P4D 0
>   Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
>   ...
>   RIP: 0010:d_path+0x22/0x280
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    bpf_d_path+0x21/0x60
>    bpf_prog_db9cf176e84498d9_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x94/0x99
>    bpf_trampoline_6442506293_0+0x55/0x1000
>    bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x5/0x10
>    security_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x29/0x40
>    bprm_execve+0x1c1/0x900
>    do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1af/0x260
>    __x64_sys_execve+0x32/0x40
> 
> It's problem for all stable trees with bpf_d_path helper, which was
> added in 5.9.
> 
> This issue is fixed in current bpf code, where we identify and mark
> trusted pointers, so the above code would fail to load.
> 
> For the sake of the stable trees and to workaround potentially broken
> verifier in the future, adding the code that reads the path object from
> the passed pointer and verifies it's valid in kernel space.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
> Fixes: 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

One question though: does it really have to go via bpf tree? Can it
be a stable-only fix? Otherwise it's not really clear why we
need to double-check anything if the pointer is trusted..

> ---
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 9a050e36dc6c..aecd98ee73dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -900,12 +900,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
>  
>  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
>  {
> +	struct path copy;
>  	long len;
>  	char *p;
>  
>  	if (!sz)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The path pointer is verified as trusted and safe to use,
> +	 * but let's double check it's valid anyway to workaround
> +	 * potentially broken verifier.
> +	 */
> +	len = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&copy, path, sizeof(*path));
> +	if (len < 0)
> +		return len;
> +
>  	p = d_path(path, buf, sz);
>  	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
>  		len = PTR_ERR(p);
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 

Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[Jiri Olsa]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 10:24:28AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 06/04, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Anastasios reported crash on stable 5.15 kernel with following
> > bpf attached to lsm hook:
> > 
> >   SEC("lsm.s/bprm_creds_for_exec")
> >   int BPF_PROG(bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> >   {
> >           struct path *path = &bprm->executable->f_path;
> >           char p[128] = { 0 };
> > 
> >           bpf_d_path(path, p, 128);
> >           return 0;
> >   }
> > 
> > but bprm->executable can be NULL, so bpf_d_path call will crash:
> > 
> >   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> >   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> >   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> >   PGD 0 P4D 0
> >   Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
> >   ...
> >   RIP: 0010:d_path+0x22/0x280
> >   ...
> >   Call Trace:
> >    <TASK>
> >    bpf_d_path+0x21/0x60
> >    bpf_prog_db9cf176e84498d9_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x94/0x99
> >    bpf_trampoline_6442506293_0+0x55/0x1000
> >    bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x5/0x10
> >    security_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x29/0x40
> >    bprm_execve+0x1c1/0x900
> >    do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1af/0x260
> >    __x64_sys_execve+0x32/0x40
> > 
> > It's problem for all stable trees with bpf_d_path helper, which was
> > added in 5.9.
> > 
> > This issue is fixed in current bpf code, where we identify and mark
> > trusted pointers, so the above code would fail to load.
> > 
> > For the sake of the stable trees and to workaround potentially broken
> > verifier in the future, adding the code that reads the path object from
> > the passed pointer and verifies it's valid in kernel space.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
> > Fixes: 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
> > Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> 
> One question though: does it really have to go via bpf tree? Can it
> be a stable-only fix? Otherwise it's not really clear why we
> need to double-check anything if the pointer is trusted..

so at the moment we consider linux_binprm->file as trusted and
always != NULL for lsm/iter and few other trampoline hooks

if that changes for some reason and linux_binprm->file will be NULL
for some reason, we might be notified just by crash first, so it
makes sense to me to have that check also in upstream 

jirka

> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 9a050e36dc6c..aecd98ee73dc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -900,12 +900,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
> >  
> >  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
> >  {
> > +	struct path copy;
> >  	long len;
> >  	char *p;
> >  
> >  	if (!sz)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The path pointer is verified as trusted and safe to use,
> > +	 * but let's double check it's valid anyway to workaround
> > +	 * potentially broken verifier.
> > +	 */
> > +	len = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&copy, path, sizeof(*path));
> > +	if (len < 0)
> > +		return len;
> > +
> >  	p = d_path(path, buf, sz);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(p)) {
> >  		len = PTR_ERR(p);
> > -- 
> > 2.40.1
> > 

Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:01 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Anastasios reported crash on stable 5.15 kernel with following
> bpf attached to lsm hook:
>
>   SEC("lsm.s/bprm_creds_for_exec")
>   int BPF_PROG(bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>   {
>           struct path *path = &bprm->executable->f_path;
>           char p[128] = { 0 };
>
>           bpf_d_path(path, p, 128);
>           return 0;
>   }
>
> but bprm->executable can be NULL, so bpf_d_path call will crash:
>
>   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
>   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>   PGD 0 P4D 0
>   Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
>   ...
>   RIP: 0010:d_path+0x22/0x280
>   ...
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    bpf_d_path+0x21/0x60
>    bpf_prog_db9cf176e84498d9_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x94/0x99
>    bpf_trampoline_6442506293_0+0x55/0x1000
>    bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x5/0x10
>    security_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x29/0x40
>    bprm_execve+0x1c1/0x900
>    do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1af/0x260
>    __x64_sys_execve+0x32/0x40
>
> It's problem for all stable trees with bpf_d_path helper, which was
> added in 5.9.
>
> This issue is fixed in current bpf code, where we identify and mark
> trusted pointers, so the above code would fail to load.
>
> For the sake of the stable trees and to workaround potentially broken
> verifier in the future, adding the code that reads the path object from
> the passed pointer and verifies it's valid in kernel space.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
> Fixes: 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 9a050e36dc6c..aecd98ee73dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -900,12 +900,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
>
>  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
>  {
> +       struct path copy;
>         long len;
>         char *p;
>
>         if (!sz)
>                 return 0;
>
> +       /*
> +        * The path pointer is verified as trusted and safe to use,
> +        * but let's double check it's valid anyway to workaround
> +        * potentially broken verifier.
> +        */
> +       len = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&copy, path, sizeof(*path));
> +       if (len < 0)
> +               return len;
> +
>         p = d_path(path, buf, sz);

Since we copied it anyway, let's use a stable copy here?
Otherwise somebody might send a patch to remove 'dead code'.

Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Add extra path pointer check to d_path helper

[Jiri Olsa]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:00:16PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:01 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Anastasios reported crash on stable 5.15 kernel with following
> > bpf attached to lsm hook:
> >
> >   SEC("lsm.s/bprm_creds_for_exec")
> >   int BPF_PROG(bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> >   {
> >           struct path *path = &bprm->executable->f_path;
> >           char p[128] = { 0 };
> >
> >           bpf_d_path(path, p, 128);
> >           return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > but bprm->executable can be NULL, so bpf_d_path call will crash:
> >
> >   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> >   #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> >   #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> >   PGD 0 P4D 0
> >   Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NOPTI
> >   ...
> >   RIP: 0010:d_path+0x22/0x280
> >   ...
> >   Call Trace:
> >    <TASK>
> >    bpf_d_path+0x21/0x60
> >    bpf_prog_db9cf176e84498d9_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x94/0x99
> >    bpf_trampoline_6442506293_0+0x55/0x1000
> >    bpf_lsm_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x5/0x10
> >    security_bprm_creds_for_exec+0x29/0x40
> >    bprm_execve+0x1c1/0x900
> >    do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x1af/0x260
> >    __x64_sys_execve+0x32/0x40
> >
> > It's problem for all stable trees with bpf_d_path helper, which was
> > added in 5.9.
> >
> > This issue is fixed in current bpf code, where we identify and mark
> > trusted pointers, so the above code would fail to load.
> >
> > For the sake of the stable trees and to workaround potentially broken
> > verifier in the future, adding the code that reads the path object from
> > the passed pointer and verifies it's valid in kernel space.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
> > Fixes: 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
> > Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Anastasios Papagiannis <tasos.papagiannnis@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 9a050e36dc6c..aecd98ee73dc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -900,12 +900,22 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_send_signal_thread_proto = {
> >
> >  BPF_CALL_3(bpf_d_path, struct path *, path, char *, buf, u32, sz)
> >  {
> > +       struct path copy;
> >         long len;
> >         char *p;
> >
> >         if (!sz)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * The path pointer is verified as trusted and safe to use,
> > +        * but let's double check it's valid anyway to workaround
> > +        * potentially broken verifier.
> > +        */
> > +       len = copy_from_kernel_nofault(&copy, path, sizeof(*path));
> > +       if (len < 0)
> > +               return len;
> > +
> >         p = d_path(path, buf, sz);
> 
> Since we copied it anyway, let's use a stable copy here?
> Otherwise somebody might send a patch to remove 'dead code'.

ok, will change that

jirka