BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb
@ 2024-02-09 16:59 Oliver Crumrine
  2024-02-09 23:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Crumrine @ 2024-02-09 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, martin.lau, song,
	yonghong.song, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa
  Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, sinquersw

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2150 bytes --]

Originally, this patch removed a redundant check in
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS, as the check was already being done in
the function it called, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. For v2, it was
reccomended that I remove the check from __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb,
and add the checks to the other macro that calls that function,
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS.

To sum it up, checking that the socket exists and that it is a full
socket is now part of both macros BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS and
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS, and it is no longer part of the
function they call, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@gmail.com>

v1->v2: Addressed feedback about where check should be removed.

---
 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 7 ++++---
 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c        | 3 ---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index a789266feac3..b28dc0ff4218 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -195,10 +195,11 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
 #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS(sk, skb)			      \
 ({									      \
 	int __ret = 0;							      \
-	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_INET_INGRESS) &&			      \
-	    cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sk, CGROUP_INET_INGRESS))		      \
+	if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_INET_INGRESS) &&			      \
+	    cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sk, CGROUP_INET_INGRESS) && sk &&	      \
+	    sk_fullsock(sk))						      \
 		__ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(sk, skb,		      \
-						    CGROUP_INET_INGRESS);     \
+						    CGROUP_INET_INGRESS);     \
 									      \
 	__ret;								      \
 })
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
index 491d20038cbe..644bfb39cf9d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
@@ -1364,9 +1364,6 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(struct sock *sk,
 	struct cgroup *cgrp;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!sk || !sk_fullsock(sk))
-		return 0;
-
 	if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET && sk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb
  2024-02-09 16:59 [PATCH v2] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb Oliver Crumrine
@ 2024-02-09 23:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2024-02-09 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oliver Crumrine
  Cc: ast, daniel, john.fastabend, andrii, martin.lau, song,
	yonghong.song, kpsingh, haoluo, jolsa, bpf, linux-kernel,
	sinquersw

On 02/09, Oliver Crumrine wrote:
> Originally, this patch removed a redundant check in
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS, as the check was already being done in
> the function it called, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb. For v2, it was
> reccomended that I remove the check from __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb,
> and add the checks to the other macro that calls that function,
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS.
> 
> To sum it up, checking that the socket exists and that it is a full
> socket is now part of both macros BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS and
> BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_INGRESS, and it is no longer part of the
> function they call, __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Crumrine <ozlinuxc@gmail.com>
> 
> v1->v2: Addressed feedback about where check should be removed.

Can you please repost with [PATCH bpf-next] subj? I think bot is having
problem applying your changes otherwise..

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-09 23:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-09 16:59 [PATCH v2] net: remove check in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb Oliver Crumrine
2024-02-09 23:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox