[PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

[PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

[Maxwell Bland]

Adds CFI checks to BPF dispatchers on aarch64.

E.g.
	<bpf_dispatcher_*_func>:
	paciasp
	stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]!
	mov x29, sp
	+ ldur w16, [x2, #-0x4]
	+ movk w17, #0x1881
	+ movk w17, #0xd942, lsl #16
	+ cmp w16, w17
	+ b.eq <bpf_dispatcher_*_func+0x24>
	+ brk #0x8222
	blr x2
	ldp x29, x30, [sp], #0x10
	autiasp
	ret

Changes in v4->v5
https://lore.kernel.org/all/wtb6czzpvtqq23t4g6hf7on257dtxzdb4fa4nuq3dtq32odmli@xoyyrtthafar/
- Fix failing BPF selftests from misplaced variable declaration

Changes in v3->v4
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fhdcjdzqdqnoehenxbipfaorseeamt3q7fbm7ghe6z5s2chif5@lrhtasolawud/
- Fix authorship attribution.

Changes in v2->v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240324211518.93892-1-puranjay12@gmail.com/
- Simplify cfi_get_func_hash to avoid needless failure case
- Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE as suggested by Mark Rutland

Changes in v1->v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com/
- Rebased on latest bpf-next/master

Mark Rutland (1):
  cfi: add C CFI type macro

Maxwell Bland (1):
  arm64/cfi,bpf: Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE in arm64

Puranjay Mohan (1):
  arm64/cfi,bpf: Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c         | 34 ++------------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c   | 35 +++------------------------------
 include/linux/cfi_types.h       | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h

--

Sorry for the extreme delay Puranjay and other maintainers on the
submission for this. The past month I was on incident response rotation
here at Moto and my hands were full with scripting build scanning steps
and other product deployment nonsense. Better late than never, though,
if these changes have not been merged yet. (-:

Tested on a cortex-a76 qemu instance and self-tests are matching the
baseline bpf-next success rate (Summary: 509/3700 PASSED, 77 SKIPPED, 37
FAILED).

Thanks for your review and regards,
Maxwell

2.39.2

[PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro

[Maxwell Bland]

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently x86 and riscv open-code 4 instances of the same logic to
define a u32 variable with the KCFI typeid of a given function.

Replace the duplicate logic with a common macro.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c       | 34 ++--------------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 35 +++--------------------------------
 include/linux/cfi_types.h     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c
index 64bdd3e1ab8c..b78a6f41df22 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c
@@ -82,41 +82,11 @@ struct bpf_insn;
 /* Must match bpf_func_t / DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN() */
 extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx,
 				    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
-
-/*
- * Force a reference to the external symbol so the compiler generates
- * __kcfi_typid.
- */
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_prog_runX);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_hash,@object				\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_hash					\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_hash:							\n"
-"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_hash, 4					\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
 
 /* Must match bpf_callback_t */
 extern u64 __bpf_callback_fn(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64);
-
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_callback_fn);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_subprog_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash,@object			\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash				\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_subprog_hash:						\n"
-"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, 4				\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
 
 u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 89de61243272..933d0c13a0d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SMP alternatives: " fmt
 
+#include <linux/cfi_types.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
@@ -901,41 +902,11 @@ struct bpf_insn;
 /* Must match bpf_func_t / DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN() */
 extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx,
 				    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
-
-/*
- * Force a reference to the external symbol so the compiler generates
- * __kcfi_typid.
- */
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_prog_runX);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_hash,@object				\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_hash					\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_hash:							\n"
-"	.long	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_hash, 4					\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
 
 /* Must match bpf_callback_t */
 extern u64 __bpf_callback_fn(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64);
-
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_callback_fn);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_subprog_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash,@object			\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash				\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_subprog_hash:						\n"
-"	.long	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, 4				\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
 
 u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/cfi_types.h b/include/linux/cfi_types.h
index 6b8713675765..f510e62ca8b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/cfi_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/cfi_types.h
@@ -41,5 +41,28 @@
 	SYM_TYPED_START(name, SYM_L_GLOBAL, SYM_A_ALIGN)
 #endif
 
+#else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
+#define DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(name, func)						\
+	/*									\
+	 * Force a reference to the function so the compiler generates		\
+	 * __kcfi_typeid_<func>.						\
+	 */									\
+	__ADDRESSABLE(func);							\
+	/* u32 name = __kcfi_typeid_<func> */					\
+	extern u32 name;							\
+	asm (									\
+	"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"	\
+	"	.type	" #name ",@object				\n"	\
+	"	.globl	" #name "					\n"	\
+	"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"	\
+	#name ":							\n"	\
+	"	.long	__kcfi_typeid_" #func "				\n"	\
+	"	.size	" #name ", 4					\n"	\
+	"	.popsection						\n"	\
+	);
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif /* _LINUX_CFI_TYPES_H */
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] arm64/cfi,bpf: Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

[Maxwell Bland]

From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>

Currently, bpf_dispatcher_*_func() is marked with `__nocfi` therefore
calling BPF programs from this interface doesn't cause CFI warnings.

When BPF programs are called directly from C: from BPF helpers or
struct_ops, CFI warnings are generated.

Implement proper CFI prologues for the BPF programs and callbacks and
drop __nocfi for arm64. Fix the trampoline generation code to emit kCFI
prologue when a struct_ops trampoline is being prepared.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h    | 23 ++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   | 21 +++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..670e191f8628
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_CFI_H
+#define _ASM_ARM64_CFI_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
+#define __bpfcall
+static inline int cfi_get_offset(void)
+{
+	return 4;
+}
+#define cfi_get_offset cfi_get_offset
+extern u32 cfi_bpf_hash;
+extern u32 cfi_bpf_subprog_hash;
+extern u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func);
+#else
+#define cfi_bpf_hash 0U
+#define cfi_bpf_subprog_hash 0U
+static inline u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_CFI_CLANG */
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_CFI_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 8ff6610af496..1715da7df137 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/elf.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/cfi.h>
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/insn.h>
 #include <asm/module.h>
@@ -298,3 +299,56 @@ noinstr void alt_cb_patch_nops(struct alt_instr *alt, __le32 *origptr,
 		updptr[i] = cpu_to_le32(aarch64_insn_gen_nop());
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(alt_cb_patch_nops);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
+struct bpf_insn;
+
+/* Must match bpf_func_t / DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN() */
+extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx,
+				    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
+
+/*
+ * Force a reference to the external symbol so the compiler generates
+ * __kcfi_typid.
+ */
+__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_prog_runX);
+
+/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX; */
+asm (
+"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
+"	.type	cfi_bpf_hash,@object				\n"
+"	.globl	cfi_bpf_hash					\n"
+"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
+"cfi_bpf_hash:							\n"
+"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX			\n"
+"	.size	cfi_bpf_hash, 4					\n"
+"	.popsection						\n"
+);
+
+/* Must match bpf_callback_t */
+extern u64 __bpf_callback_fn(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64);
+
+__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_callback_fn);
+
+/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_subprog_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn; */
+asm (
+"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
+"	.type	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash,@object			\n"
+"	.globl	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash				\n"
+"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
+"cfi_bpf_subprog_hash:						\n"
+"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn			\n"
+"	.size	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, 4				\n"
+"	.popsection						\n"
+);
+
+u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func)
+{
+	u32 hash;
+
+	if (get_kernel_nofault(hash, func - cfi_get_offset()))
+		return 0;
+
+	return hash;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 720336d28856..211e1c29f004 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <asm/asm-extable.h>
 #include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#include <asm/cfi.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/insn.h>
 #include <asm/patching.h>
@@ -162,6 +163,12 @@ static inline void emit_bti(u32 insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 		emit(insn, ctx);
 }
 
+static inline void emit_kcfi(u32 hash, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG))
+		emit(hash, ctx);
+}
+
 /*
  * Kernel addresses in the vmalloc space use at most 48 bits, and the
  * remaining bits are guaranteed to be 0x1. So we can compose the address
@@ -311,7 +318,6 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
 	const u8 tcc = bpf2a64[TCALL_CNT];
 	const u8 fpb = bpf2a64[FP_BOTTOM];
 	const u8 arena_vm_base = bpf2a64[ARENA_VM_START];
-	const int idx0 = ctx->idx;
 	int cur_offset;
 
 	/*
@@ -337,6 +343,9 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
 	 *
 	 */
 
+	emit_kcfi(is_main_prog ? cfi_bpf_hash : cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, ctx);
+	const int idx0 = ctx->idx;
+
 	/* bpf function may be invoked by 3 instruction types:
 	 * 1. bl, attached via freplace to bpf prog via short jump
 	 * 2. br, attached via freplace to bpf prog via long jump
@@ -1849,9 +1858,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		jit_data->ro_header = ro_header;
 	}
 
-	prog->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.ro_image;
+	prog->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.ro_image + cfi_get_offset();
 	prog->jited = 1;
-	prog->jited_len = prog_size;
+	prog->jited_len = prog_size - cfi_get_offset();
 
 	if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
 		int i;
@@ -2104,6 +2113,12 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	/* return address locates above FP */
 	retaddr_off = stack_size + 8;
 
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT) {
+		/*
+		 * Indirect call for bpf_struct_ops
+		 */
+		emit_kcfi(cfi_get_func_hash(func_addr), ctx);
+	}
 	/* bpf trampoline may be invoked by 3 instruction types:
 	 * 1. bl, attached to bpf prog or kernel function via short jump
 	 * 2. br, attached to bpf prog or kernel function via long jump
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] arm64/cfi,bpf: Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE in arm64

[Maxwell Bland]

Corrects Puranjay Mohan's commit to adopt Mark Rutland's
suggestion of using a C CFI type macro in kCFI+BPF.

Signed-off-by: Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 46 ++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
index 1715da7df137..d7a58eca7665 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "alternatives: " fmt
 
+#include <linux/cfi_types.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/elf.h>
@@ -302,53 +303,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(alt_cb_patch_nops);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
 struct bpf_insn;
-
 /* Must match bpf_func_t / DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN() */
 extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx,
 				    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
-
-/*
- * Force a reference to the external symbol so the compiler generates
- * __kcfi_typid.
- */
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_prog_runX);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_hash,@object				\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_hash					\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_hash:							\n"
-"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_hash, 4					\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
-
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
 /* Must match bpf_callback_t */
 extern u64 __bpf_callback_fn(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64);
-
-__ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_callback_fn);
-
-/* u32 __ro_after_init cfi_bpf_subprog_hash = __kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn; */
-asm (
-"	.pushsection	.data..ro_after_init,\"aw\",@progbits	\n"
-"	.type	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash,@object			\n"
-"	.globl	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash				\n"
-"	.p2align	2, 0x0					\n"
-"cfi_bpf_subprog_hash:						\n"
-"	.word	__kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn			\n"
-"	.size	cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, 4				\n"
-"	.popsection						\n"
-);
-
+DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
 u32 cfi_get_func_hash(void *func)
 {
-	u32 hash;
-
-	if (get_kernel_nofault(hash, func - cfi_get_offset()))
-		return 0;
-
-	return hash;
+	u32 *hashp = func - cfi_get_offset();
+	return READ_ONCE(*hashp);
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

[Maxwell Bland]

Adds CFI checks to BPF dispatchers on aarch64.

E.g.
	<bpf_dispatcher_*_func>:
	paciasp
	stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]!
	mov x29, sp
	+ ldur w16, [x2, #-0x4]
	+ movk w17, #0x1881
	+ movk w17, #0xd942, lsl #16
	+ cmp w16, w17
	+ b.eq <bpf_dispatcher_*_func+0x24>
	+ brk #0x8222
	blr x2
	ldp x29, x30, [sp], #0x10
	autiasp
	ret

Changes in v4->v5
https://lore.kernel.org/all/wtb6czzpvtqq23t4g6hf7on257dtxzdb4fa4nuq3dtq32odmli@xoyyrtthafar/
- Fix failing BPF selftests from misplaced variable declaration

Changes in v3->v4
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fhdcjdzqdqnoehenxbipfaorseeamt3q7fbm7ghe6z5s2chif5@lrhtasolawud/
- Fix authorship attribution.

Changes in v2->v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240324211518.93892-1-puranjay12@gmail.com/
- Simplify cfi_get_func_hash to avoid needless failure case
- Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE as suggested by Mark Rutland

Changes in v1->v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com/
- Rebased on latest bpf-next/master

Mark Rutland (1):
  cfi: add C CFI type macro

Maxwell Bland (1):
  arm64/cfi,bpf: Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE in arm64

Puranjay Mohan (1):
  arm64/cfi,bpf: Support kCFI + BPF on arm64

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c         | 34 ++------------------------------
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c   | 35 +++------------------------------
 include/linux/cfi_types.h       | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h

--

Sorry for the extreme delay Puranjay and other maintainers on the
submission for this. The past month I was on incident response rotation
here at Moto and my hands were full with scripting build scanning steps
and other product deployment nonsense. Better late than never, though,
if these changes have not been merged yet. (-:

Tested on a cortex-a76 qemu instance and self-tests are matching the
baseline bpf-next success rate (Summary: 509/3700 PASSED, 77 SKIPPED, 37
FAILED).

Thanks for your review and regards,
Maxwell

2.39.2

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro

[kernel test robot]

Hi Maxwell,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxwell-Bland/arm64-cfi-bpf-Support-kCFI-BPF-on-arm64/20240611-021203
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/cwhnmpn5yvg6ma7mvjviy4p7z6gdoba57daeprpc4zcokfhpv2%4044gvdmcfuspt
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro
config: riscv-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240611/202406111716.SluzXu9X-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4403cdbaf01379de96f8d0d6ea4f51a085e37766)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240611/202406111716.SluzXu9X-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406111716.SluzXu9X-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c:85:1: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int]
      85 | DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
         | ^
         | int
>> arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c:85:17: error: a parameter list without types is only allowed in a function definition
      85 | DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
         |                 ^
   arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c:89:1: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int]
      89 | DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
         | ^
         | int
   arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c:89:17: error: a parameter list without types is only allowed in a function definition
      89 | DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_subprog_hash, __bpf_callback_fn);
         |                 ^
   4 errors generated.


vim +/int +85 arch/riscv/kernel/cfi.c

    81	
    82	/* Must match bpf_func_t / DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN() */
    83	extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx,
    84					    const struct bpf_insn *insn);
  > 85	DEFINE_CFI_TYPE(cfi_bpf_hash, __bpf_prog_runX);
    86	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro

[Catalin Marinas]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:06:33PM -0500, Maxwell Bland wrote:
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> 
> Currently x86 and riscv open-code 4 instances of the same logic to
> define a u32 variable with the KCFI typeid of a given function.
> 
> Replace the duplicate logic with a common macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

This patch is missing your signed-off-by (the same with the second
patch). Since you are submitting it, you should also add yours in
addition to the author's s-o-b.

-- 
Catalin

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro

[Maxwell Bland]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 05:30:28PM GMT, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch is missing your signed-off-by (the same with the second
> patch). Since you are submitting it, you should also add yours in
> addition to the author's s-o-b.

I see, thank you Catalin. I have also fixed the compiler errors.

Usually I would wait a week to resubmit, but since v5 took me a while to
get out the door, I've pushed a new version here:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/illfkwuxwq3adca2h4shibz2xub62kku3g2wte4sqp7xj7cwkb@ckn3qg7zxjuv/

Maxwell