From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 13/13] perf parse-events: Remove ABORT_ON
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:40:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3517306-7804-f5cf-6182-ef63b6054647@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fX+kdRujgNAq8SVkkNwgnB383r38+AEmvon1k01R4X=kg@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Prefer informative messages rather than none with ABORT_ON. Document
>>> one failure mode and add an error message for another.
>>
>> Does such a wording really fit to the known requirement “Solve only one problem per patch.”?
>>
>> See also:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.4#n81
>
> Sorry your explanation isn't clear.
Do you really find the application of the linked development documentation unclear
in this case?
> Sorry your explanation isn't clear. Please can you elaborate.
Will it become helpful to split the proposed patch into smaller update steps?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-30 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 18:10 [PATCH v2 00/13] parse-events clean up Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] perf parse-events: Remove unused PE_PMU_EVENT_FAKE token Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 16:35 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-30 17:05 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 17:15 ` [v2 " Markus Elfring
2023-06-30 17:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 17:23 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-30 17:33 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 17:52 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-30 18:01 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-01 8:00 ` Markus Elfring
2023-07-03 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 " Dan Carpenter
2023-07-03 13:08 ` [v2 " Markus Elfring
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] perf parse-events: Remove unused PE_KERNEL_PMU_EVENT token Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] perf parse-events: Remove two unused tokens Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] perf parse-events: Add more comments to parse_events_state Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] perf parse-events: Avoid regrouped warning for wild card events Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] perf parse-event: Add memory allocation test for name terms Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] perf parse-events: Separate YYABORT and YYNOMEM cases Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] perf parse-events: Move instances of YYABORT to YYNOMEM Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] perf parse-events: Separate ENOMEM memory handling Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] perf parse-events: Additional error reporting Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] perf parse-events: Populate error column for BPF/tracepoint events Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] perf parse-events: Improve location for add pmu Ian Rogers
2023-06-27 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] perf parse-events: Remove ABORT_ON Ian Rogers
2023-06-29 21:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-06-30 15:14 ` Ian Rogers
2023-07-01 18:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-07-12 5:01 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 16:56 ` Markus Elfring
2023-06-30 17:06 ` Ian Rogers
2023-06-30 17:40 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2023-06-30 18:05 ` [v2 " Ian Rogers
2023-07-01 9:00 ` Markus Elfring
2023-07-01 9:32 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3517306-7804-f5cf-6182-ef63b6054647@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox