* [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Negative test case for tail call map
@ 2025-07-07 10:55 Paul Chaignon
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul Chaignon @ 2025-07-07 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Eduard Zingerman, Yonghong Song
This patch adds a negative test case for the following verifier error.
expected prog array map for tail call
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Removed BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT flag as suggested by Yonghong.
Changes in v2:
- Moved the test to prog_tests format as suggested by Eduard.
- Rebased.
- v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7cec754c8d4cc2d93a50e9091d7ccc7f33d454d4.1751578055.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com/
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index c9da06741104..77ec95d4ffaa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
#include "verifier_store_release.skel.h"
#include "verifier_subprog_precision.skel.h"
#include "verifier_subreg.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_tailcall.skel.h"
#include "verifier_tailcall_jit.skel.h"
#include "verifier_typedef.skel.h"
#include "verifier_uninit.skel.h"
@@ -219,6 +220,7 @@ void test_verifier_stack_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_stack_ptr); }
void test_verifier_store_release(void) { RUN(verifier_store_release); }
void test_verifier_subprog_precision(void) { RUN(verifier_subprog_precision); }
void test_verifier_subreg(void) { RUN(verifier_subreg); }
+void test_verifier_tailcall(void) { RUN(verifier_tailcall); }
void test_verifier_tailcall_jit(void) { RUN(verifier_tailcall_jit); }
void test_verifier_typedef(void) { RUN(verifier_typedef); }
void test_verifier_uninit(void) { RUN(verifier_uninit); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e58ca0cdbeb2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_tailcall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, long long);
+ __type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_hash_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid map type for tail call")
+__failure __msg("expected prog array map for tail call")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void invalid_map_for_tail_call(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ r3 = 0; \
+ call %[bpf_tail_call]; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_tail_call),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b),
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-07-07 10:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-07 10:55 [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Negative test case for tail call map Paul Chaignon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox