[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Test btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs

[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Test btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs

[Hengqi Chen]

Add test for btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs. It first
checks that if btrfs module BTF exists, if yes, load module BTF and
check symbol existence.

Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cad1314e3356
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Hengqi Chen */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+
+static const char *module_path = "/sys/kernel/btf/btrfs";
+static const char *module_name = "btrfs";
+
+void test_btf_module()
+{
+	struct btf *vmlinux_btf, *module_btf;
+	__s32 type_id;
+
+	if (access(module_path, F_OK))
+		return;
+
+	vmlinux_btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(vmlinux_btf, "could not load vmlinux BTF"))
+		return;
+
+	module_btf = btf__load_module_btf(module_name, vmlinux_btf);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(module_btf, "could not load module BTF"))
+		return;
+
+	type_id = btf__find_by_name(module_btf, "btrfs_file_open");
+	ASSERT_GT(type_id, 0, "func btrfs_file_open not found");
+
+	btf__free(module_btf);
+	btf__free(vmlinux_btf);
+}
-- 
2.30.2

Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Test btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs

[Yonghong Song]

On 7/31/21 7:32 AM, Hengqi Chen wrote:
> Add test for btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs. It first
> checks that if btrfs module BTF exists, if yes, load module BTF and
> check symbol existence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
> ---
>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cad1314e3356
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2021 Hengqi Chen */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <bpf/btf.h>
> +
> +static const char *module_path = "/sys/kernel/btf/btrfs";
> +static const char *module_name = "btrfs";
> +
> +void test_btf_module()
> +{
> +	struct btf *vmlinux_btf, *module_btf;
> +	__s32 type_id;
> +
> +	if (access(module_path, F_OK))
> +		return;
> +
> +	vmlinux_btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(vmlinux_btf, "could not load vmlinux BTF"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	module_btf = btf__load_module_btf(module_name, vmlinux_btf);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(module_btf, "could not load module BTF"))
> +		return;

Should we do `btf__free(vmlinux_btf)` before `return`?
 From implementation perspective, maybe use "goto" so we have one
place to do `btf__free(vmlinux_btf)`.

> +
> +	type_id = btf__find_by_name(module_btf, "btrfs_file_open");
> +	ASSERT_GT(type_id, 0, "func btrfs_file_open not found");
> +
> +	btf__free(module_btf);
> +	btf__free(vmlinux_btf);
> +}
> 

Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Test btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs

[Hengqi Chen]

On 8/2/21 10:44 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/31/21 7:32 AM, Hengqi Chen wrote:
>> Add test for btf__load_vmlinux_btf/btf__load_module_btf APIs. It first
>> checks that if btrfs module BTF exists, if yes, load module BTF and
>> check symbol existence.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..cad1314e3356
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_module.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2021 Hengqi Chen */
>> +
>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include <bpf/btf.h>
>> +
>> +static const char *module_path = "/sys/kernel/btf/btrfs";
>> +static const char *module_name = "btrfs";
>> +
>> +void test_btf_module()
>> +{
>> +    struct btf *vmlinux_btf, *module_btf;
>> +    __s32 type_id;
>> +
>> +    if (access(module_path, F_OK))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    vmlinux_btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(vmlinux_btf, "could not load vmlinux BTF"))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    module_btf = btf__load_module_btf(module_name, vmlinux_btf);
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(module_btf, "could not load module BTF"))
>> +        return;
> 
> Should we do `btf__free(vmlinux_btf)` before `return`?
> From implementation perspective, maybe use "goto" so we have one
> place to do `btf__free(vmlinux_btf)`.
> 

Didn't notice that ASSERT macro does not abort the execution.
Will add cleanup code.

>> +
>> +    type_id = btf__find_by_name(module_btf, "btrfs_file_open");
>> +    ASSERT_GT(type_id, 0, "func btrfs_file_open not found");
>> +
>> +    btf__free(module_btf);
>> +    btf__free(vmlinux_btf);
>> +}
>>