From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test stack depth stats without BTF subprog names
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 14:54:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaaec551f6623758ddc1e31dc5ccab0afdd90ec.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260801230400.850271-4-memxor@gmail.com>
On Sun, 2026-08-02 at 01:03 +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
...
> @@ -1559,7 +1560,9 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
> test->errstr_unpriv : test->errstr;
>
> opts.expected_attach_type = test->expected_attach_type;
> - if (expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT)
> + if (test->log_level)
> + opts.log_level = test->log_level;
> + else if (expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT)
> opts.log_level = 2;
I did this:
else if (expected_ret == VERBOSE_ACCEPT)
- opts.log_level = 2;
+ opts.log_level = 2 | 4;
And all test_verifier tests passed.
There is no need to a new option.
> else if (verbose)
> opts.log_level = verif_log_level | 4; /* force stats */
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 23:03 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] Improve stack depth verification stats output Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 23:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: Show more useful info in stack depth stats Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 23:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 23:15 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-02 0:35 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-02 21:02 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-02 21:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-02 22:03 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-01 23:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/3] selftests/bpf: Adjust veristat stack depth parsing Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-02 21:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-02 22:00 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-01 23:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test stack depth stats without BTF subprog names Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-08-02 21:54 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-02 22:00 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adaaec551f6623758ddc1e31dc5ccab0afdd90ec.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox