BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] tls: remove dead sockmap (psock) handling from the SW path
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:20:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajB6qqoeVGz1ab_S@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260614014102.461064-3-kuba@kernel.org>

2026-06-13, 18:40:57 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> TLS and sockmap are now mutually exclusive. Try to delete the code
> from sendmsg and recvmsg path which is now obviously dead.
> 
> The main goal is to delete enough code for AI security scanners
> to no longer bother us with sockmap related bugs. At the same
> time retain the code in case someone has the cycles to fix
> all of this and make the integration work, again.
> 
> If the integration does not get restored we can wipe the rest
> of the skmsg code from TLS in two or three releases.
> 
> The changes on the Tx side are deeper since that's where most
> of the bugs are, Rx side simply takes the data from sockmap
> and gives it to the user. On Tx split record handling and
> rolling back the iterator were the two problem areas.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/skmsg.h |   9 -
>  net/core/skmsg.c      |  52 +-----
>  net/tls/tls_main.c    |   8 +-
>  net/tls/tls_sw.c      | 399 +++---------------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 437 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>


> @@ -2417,7 +2088,7 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>  		} else {
>  			struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
>  
> -			err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, NULL, true, released, !!copied);
> +			err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, true, released, !!copied);

nit: There's also a leftover sk_psock_get in that function. We can
clean it up later, let's get this series in.

-- 
Sabrina

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-14  1:40 [PATCH net-next 0/5] tls: reject the combination of TLS and sockmap Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-14  1:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-14  8:09   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-06-14 19:12     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-15 18:20       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-15  1:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-15 18:45   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-15 22:00     ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-06-14  1:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] tls: remove dead sockmap (psock) handling from the SW path Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-15 14:55   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2026-06-15 22:20   ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2026-06-14  1:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: remove sockmap + ktls tests Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-14  1:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: drop the unused kTLS program from test_sockmap Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-14  1:41 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: test that TLS crypto is rejected on a sockmap socket Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajB6qqoeVGz1ab_S@krikkit \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox