BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Fix pointer type mismatch build error
@ 2026-07-15  5:35 Kuan-Ying Lee
  2026-07-15  7:32 ` Jiri Olsa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kuan-Ying Lee @ 2026-07-15  5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kuan-ying.lee, Kees Cook, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry,
	Shuah Khan, Jiri Olsa, Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
  Cc: linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf

We hit the following build error while running the seccomp selftests in
our testing.

CC seccomp_bpf
seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘UPROBE_setup’:
seccomp_bpf.c:5175:74: error: pointer type mismatch in conditional expression [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
| ^
seccomp_bpf.c:5175:57: note: first expression has type ‘int (*)(void)’
5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
seccomp_bpf.c:5175:76: note: second expression has type ‘int (__attribute__((nocf_check)) *)(void)’
5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

get_uprobe_offset() takes a 'const void *' argument, so cast both
operands to 'void *'.

Fixes: 9ffc7a635c35 ("selftests/seccomp: validate uprobe syscall passes through seccomp")
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <kuan-ying.lee@canonical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 358b6c65e120..0622bc2acad4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -5178,7 +5178,8 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(UPROBE)
 		ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
 	}
 
-	offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
+	offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? (void *)probed_uretprobe
+						      : (void *)probed_uprobe);
 	ASSERT_GE(offset, 0);
 
 	if (variant->uretprobe)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Fix pointer type mismatch build error
  2026-07-15  5:35 [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Fix pointer type mismatch build error Kuan-Ying Lee
@ 2026-07-15  7:32 ` Jiri Olsa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2026-07-15  7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kuan-Ying Lee
  Cc: Kees Cook, Andy Lutomirski, Will Drewry, Shuah Khan,
	Peter Zijlstra (Intel), linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, bpf

On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 01:35:52PM +0800, Kuan-Ying Lee wrote:
> We hit the following build error while running the seccomp selftests in
> our testing.
> 
> CC seccomp_bpf
> seccomp_bpf.c: In function ‘UPROBE_setup’:
> seccomp_bpf.c:5175:74: error: pointer type mismatch in conditional expression [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
> | ^
> seccomp_bpf.c:5175:57: note: first expression has type ‘int (*)(void)’
> 5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> seccomp_bpf.c:5175:76: note: second expression has type ‘int (__attribute__((nocf_check)) *)(void)’
> 5175 | offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> get_uprobe_offset() takes a 'const void *' argument, so cast both
> operands to 'void *'.
> 
> Fixes: 9ffc7a635c35 ("selftests/seccomp: validate uprobe syscall passes through seccomp")
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <kuan-ying.lee@canonical.com>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka


> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index 358b6c65e120..0622bc2acad4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -5178,7 +5178,8 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(UPROBE)
>  		ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
>  	}
>  
> -	offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
> +	offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? (void *)probed_uretprobe
> +						      : (void *)probed_uprobe);
>  	ASSERT_GE(offset, 0);
>  
>  	if (variant->uretprobe)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-15  7:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-15  5:35 [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Fix pointer type mismatch build error Kuan-Ying Lee
2026-07-15  7:32 ` Jiri Olsa

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox