public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	ebpf@linuxfoundation.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_skb_cgroup_id_user to test_progs
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:17:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3329b35-a41b-4f21-9b7b-8fc9b04eedd2@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f47361f-caf8-45f2-9aaf-4a2a49eb525b@linux.dev>

Hello Martin,

On 8/15/24 04:20, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 8/13/24 5:45 AM, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> 
>> +#define DST_ADDR "ff02::1"
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +static int wait_local_ip(void)
>> +{
>> +    char *ping_cmd = ping_command(AF_INET6);
>> +    int i, err;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < WAIT_AUTO_IP_MAX_ATTEMPT; i++) {
>> +        err = SYS_NOFAIL("%s -c 1 -W 1 %s%%%s", ping_cmd, DST_ADDR,
>> +                 VETH_1);
> 
> I tried in my qemu. This loop takes at least 3-4 iteration to get the ping
> through. This test could become flaky if the CI is busy.
> 
> I have been always wondering why some of the (non) test_progs has this practice.
> I traced a little. I think it has something to do with the "ff02::1" used in the
> test and/or the local link address is not ready. I have not further nailed it
> down but I think it is close enough.
> 
> It will be easier to use a nodad configured v6 addr.
> 
> I take this chance to use an easier "::1" address for the test here instead of
> ff02::1. This also removed the need to add veth pair and no need to ping first.
> 
> Applied with the "::1" changes mentioned above.

Thanks for the improvement. So far I tried to preserve as much as possible the
original test behavior to avoid accidentally removing some important features,
but I guess the more tests I work on, the more confident I will be to
"challenge" some parts ;)

> Thanks for migrating the tests to test_progs. This is long overdue.

For the record, the next test I am targeting is test_xdp_features.sh. I have
undertaken the conversion and have a working base but it still needs some work.

Thanks,

Alexis


-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-15  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13 12:45 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert three other cgroup tests to test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2024-08-13 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] selftests/bpf: convert get_current_cgroup_id_user " Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2024-08-13 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_cgroup_storage " Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2024-08-13 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] selftests/bpf: add proper section name to bpf prog and rename it Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2024-08-13 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: convert test_skb_cgroup_id_user to test_progs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2024-08-15  2:20   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-15  8:17     ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2024-08-15  2:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] selftests/bpf: convert three other cgroup tests " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3329b35-a41b-4f21-9b7b-8fc9b04eedd2@bootlin.com \
    --to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox