* [PATCH] bpftool: check for NULL ptr of btf in codegen_subskel_datasecs
@ 2024-08-21 13:31 Ma Ke
2024-08-21 17:57 ` Yonghong Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ma Ke @ 2024-08-21 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qmo, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song,
yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa,
delyank
Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, Ma Ke, stable
bpf_object__btf() can return NULL value. If bpf_object__btf returns null,
do not progress through codegen_subskel_datasecs(). This avoids a null ptr
dereference.
Found by code review, complie tested only.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 00389c58ffe9 ("bpftool: Add support for subskeletons")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
index 5a4d3240689e..7ce62f280310 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
@@ -334,6 +334,9 @@ static int codegen_subskel_datasecs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name
const char *sec_name, *var_name;
__u32 var_type_id;
+ if (!btf)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
d = btf_dump__new(btf, codegen_btf_dump_printf, NULL, NULL);
if (!d)
return -errno;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpftool: check for NULL ptr of btf in codegen_subskel_datasecs
2024-08-21 13:31 [PATCH] bpftool: check for NULL ptr of btf in codegen_subskel_datasecs Ma Ke
@ 2024-08-21 17:57 ` Yonghong Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2024-08-21 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ma Ke, qmo, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song,
john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, delyank
Cc: bpf, linux-kernel, stable
On 8/21/24 6:31 AM, Ma Ke wrote:
> bpf_object__btf() can return NULL value. If bpf_object__btf returns null,
> do not progress through codegen_subskel_datasecs(). This avoids a null ptr
> dereference.
>
> Found by code review, complie tested only.
Do you have a real case to show null ptr reference here?
Code review and compile test are not enough. You should have
a real reproducible case before you send the patch.
For this particular case, we have check
btf = bpf_object__btf(obj);
if (!btf) {
err = -1;
p_err("need btf type information for %s", obj_name);
goto out;
}
which ensures that btf is available before codegen for subskeleton,
so what you described won't happen in practice.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 00389c58ffe9 ("bpftool: Add support for subskeletons")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
> index 5a4d3240689e..7ce62f280310 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,9 @@ static int codegen_subskel_datasecs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name
> const char *sec_name, *var_name;
> __u32 var_type_id;
>
> + if (!btf)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> d = btf_dump__new(btf, codegen_btf_dump_printf, NULL, NULL);
> if (!d)
> return -errno;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-21 17:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-21 13:31 [PATCH] bpftool: check for NULL ptr of btf in codegen_subskel_datasecs Ma Ke
2024-08-21 17:57 ` Yonghong Song
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox