BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>, thinker.li@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	davemarchevsky@meta.com, dvernet@meta.com, kuifeng@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/4] bpf: Create argument information for nullable arguments.
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:50:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecded04a-6917-49ee-ae83-e1bfa43bd725@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcoEzyRzxLUWWhw4@krava>



On 2/12/24 03:45, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 06:37:49PM -0800, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>>   enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
>> @@ -1790,6 +1806,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>>   			     struct btf *btf,
>>   			     struct bpf_verifier_log *log);
>>   void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struct bpf_map *map);
>> +void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc);
>>   #else
>>   #define register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops, type) ({ (void *)(st_ops); 0; })
>>   static inline bool bpf_try_module_get(const void *data, struct module *owner)
>> @@ -1814,6 +1831,10 @@ static inline void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struc
>>   {
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc, int len)
>> +{
>> +}
> 
> extra len argument?

Yes, this one should be removed.

> 
> jirka
> 
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +/* Clean up the arg_info in a struct bpf_struct_ops_desc. */
>> +void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc)
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_arg_info *arg_info;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	arg_info = st_ops_desc->arg_info;
>> +	if (!arg_info)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < btf_type_vlen(st_ops_desc->type); i++)
>> +		kfree(arg_info[i].info);
>> +
>> +	kfree(arg_info);
>> +}
>> +
>>   int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>>   			     struct btf *btf,
>>   			     struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
>>   {
>>   	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = st_ops_desc->st_ops;
>> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_arg_info *arg_info;
>>   	const struct btf_member *member;
>>   	const struct btf_type *t;
>>   	s32 type_id, value_id;
>>   	char value_name[128];
>>   	const char *mname;
>> -	int i;
>> +	int i, err;
>>   
>>   	if (strlen(st_ops->name) + VALUE_PREFIX_LEN >=
>>   	    sizeof(value_name)) {
>> @@ -160,6 +320,17 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>>   	if (!is_valid_value_type(btf, value_id, t, value_name))
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> +	arg_info = kcalloc(btf_type_vlen(t), sizeof(*arg_info),
>> +			   GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!arg_info)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	st_ops_desc->arg_info = arg_info;
>> +	st_ops_desc->type = t;
>> +	st_ops_desc->type_id = type_id;
>> +	st_ops_desc->value_id = value_id;
>> +	st_ops_desc->value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
>> +
>>   	for_each_member(i, t, member) {
>>   		const struct btf_type *func_proto;
>>   
>> @@ -167,40 +338,52 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
>>   		if (!*mname) {
>>   			pr_warn("anon member in struct %s is not supported\n",
>>   				st_ops->name);
>> -			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +			goto errout;
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		if (__btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member)) {
>>   			pr_warn("bit field member %s in struct %s is not supported\n",
>>   				mname, st_ops->name);
>> -			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +			goto errout;
>>   		}
>>   
>>   		func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf,
>>   						       member->type,
>>   						       NULL);
>> -		if (func_proto &&
>> -		    btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
>> +		if (!func_proto)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (btf_distill_func_proto(log, btf,
>>   					   func_proto, mname,
>>   					   &st_ops->func_models[i])) {
>>   			pr_warn("Error in parsing func ptr %s in struct %s\n",
>>   				mname, st_ops->name);
>> -			return -EINVAL;
>> +			err = -EINVAL;
>> +			goto errout;
>>   		}
>> +
>> +		err = prepare_arg_info(btf, st_ops->name, mname,
>> +				       func_proto,
>> +				       arg_info + i);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			goto errout;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (st_ops->init(btf)) {
>>   		pr_warn("Error in init bpf_struct_ops %s\n",
>>   			st_ops->name);
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto errout;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	st_ops_desc->type_id = type_id;
>> -	st_ops_desc->type = t;
>> -	st_ops_desc->value_id = value_id;
>> -	st_ops_desc->value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
>> -
>>   	return 0;
>> +
>> +errout:
>> +	bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(st_ops_desc);
>> +
>> +	return err;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int bpf_struct_ops_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> index db53bb76387e..533f02b92c94 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
>> @@ -1699,6 +1699,13 @@ static void btf_free_struct_meta_tab(struct btf *btf)
>>   static void btf_free_struct_ops_tab(struct btf *btf)
>>   {
>>   	struct btf_struct_ops_tab *tab = btf->struct_ops_tab;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	if (!tab)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < tab->cnt; i++)
>> +		bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(&tab->ops[i]);
>>   
>>   	kfree(tab);
>>   	btf->struct_ops_tab = NULL;
>> @@ -6130,6 +6137,26 @@ static bool prog_args_trusted(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +int btf_ctx_arg_offset(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *func_proto,
>> +		       u32 arg_no)
>> +{
>> +	const struct btf_param *args;
>> +	const struct btf_type *t;
>> +	int off = 0, i;
>> +	u32 sz;
>> +
>> +	args = btf_params(func_proto);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < arg_no; i++) {
>> +		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, args[i].type);
>> +		t = btf_resolve_size(btf, t, &sz);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(t))
>> +			return PTR_ERR(t);
>> +		off += roundup(sz, 8);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return off;
>> +}
>> +
>>   bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
>>   		    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
>>   		    struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index c92d6af7d975..72ca27f49616 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -20419,6 +20419,12 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* btf_ctx_access() used this to provide argument type info */
>> +	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info =
>> +		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].info;
>> +	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size =
>> +		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].cnt;
>> +
>>   	prog->aux->attach_func_proto = func_proto;
>>   	prog->aux->attach_func_name = mname;
>>   	env->ops = st_ops->verifier_ops;
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-12 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09  2:37 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/4] Support PTR_MAYBE_NULL for struct_ops arguments thinker.li
2024-02-09  2:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/4] bpf: add btf pointer to struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux thinker.li
2024-02-11 18:59   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-09  2:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/4] bpf: Move __kfunc_param_match_suffix() to btf.c thinker.li
2024-02-09  2:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/4] bpf: Create argument information for nullable arguments thinker.li
2024-02-11 19:49   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-12 17:09     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-12 11:45   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-12 17:50     ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-02-13 23:27     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-02-09  2:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test PTR_MAYBE_NULL arguments of struct_ops operators thinker.li
2024-02-13 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/4] Support PTR_MAYBE_NULL for struct_ops arguments patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecded04a-6917-49ee-ae83-e1bfa43bd725@gmail.com \
    --to=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
    --cc=dvernet@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox