BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects.
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:22:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcae9370-82ab-4c2f-90f5-e3a704f6d11c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510002942.1253354-3-thinker.li@gmail.com>

On 5/9/24 5:29 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> +static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach(struct bpf_link *link)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_link *st_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_struct_ops_link, link);
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
> +	struct bpf_map *map;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&update_mutex);
> +
> +	map = rcu_dereference_protected(st_link->map, lockdep_is_held(&update_mutex));
> +	if (!map) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&update_mutex);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	st_map = container_of(map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +
> +	st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data, link);
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(st_link->map, NULL);
> +	/* Pair with bpf_map_get() in bpf_struct_ops_link_create() or
> +	 * bpf_map_inc() in bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update().
> +	 */
> +	bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&update_mutex);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_lops = {
>   	.dealloc = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc,
> +	.detach = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach,
>   	.show_fdinfo = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_show_fdinfo,
>   	.fill_link_info = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_fill_link_info,
>   	.update_map = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update,
> @@ -1176,13 +1208,19 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>   	if (err)
>   		goto err_out;
>   
> +	/* Init link->map before calling reg() in case being detached
> +	 * immediately.
> +	 */

It is not obvious in the patch how this (immediate detach by subsystem after 
reg) may work without race, so I think it is easier to ask.

[ I put back the err_out context at the end ]

> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, map);
> +
>   	err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->reg(st_map->kvalue.data, &link->link);
>   	if (err) {
> +		RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, NULL);

In the bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach() above, the update to link->map is 
protected by the update_mutex. Could you explain how the link->map update to 
NULL is safe here without holding the update_mutex?

>   		bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
> +		/* The link has been free by bpf_link_cleanup() */
>   		link = NULL;
>   		goto err_out;
>   	}
> -	RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, map);
>   
>   	return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
>

err_out:
	bpf_map_put(map);
	kfree(link);
	return err;
}



  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-21  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-10  0:29 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] Notify user space when a struct_ops object is detached/unregistered Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21  1:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-05-21  7:30     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 18:09       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/7] bpf: support epoll from bpf struct_ops links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21  1:26   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-21  7:31     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf: export bpf_link_inc_not_zero Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/7] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops with epoll Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/7] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:56   ` Amery Hung
2024-05-22  0:31     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-22 17:33       ` Amery Hung
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/7] selftests/bpf: make sure bpf_testmod handling racing link destroying well Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcae9370-82ab-4c2f-90f5-e3a704f6d11c@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox