* [PATCH 0/6] net: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_*() functions
@ 2024-06-03 9:15 Wolfram Sang
2024-06-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout() Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-06-03 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Arend van Spriel, ath11k, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl,
brcm80211, Christian Lamparter, Jeff Johnson, Kalle Valo,
linux-wireless, Ping-Ke Shih
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_*() functions causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
obvious and self explaining.
This is part of a tree-wide series. The rest of the patches can be found here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/time_left
Because these patches are generated, I audit them before sending. This is why I
will send series step by step. Build bot is happy with these patches, though.
No functional changes intended.
Wolfram Sang (6):
wifi: ath11k: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
wifi: mac80211: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
wifi: p54: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout()
wifi: rtw89: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
wifi: zd1211rw: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/qmi.c | 20 +++++++++----------
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/fwio.c | 6 +++---
drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/p54pci.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/net/wireless/intersil/p54/p54spi.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 6 +++---
drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c | 8 ++++----
8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
2024-06-03 9:15 [PATCH 0/6] net: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_*() functions Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-06-03 9:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-03 9:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2024-06-12 12:01 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-06-03 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo, linux-wireless,
brcm80211, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
index 5fe0e671ecb3..1585a5653ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -4071,7 +4071,7 @@ static void brcmf_report_wowl_wakeind(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
struct cfg80211_wowlan_wakeup *wakeup;
u32 wakeind;
s32 err;
- int timeout;
+ long time_left;
err = brcmf_fil_iovar_data_get(ifp, "wowl_wakeind", &wake_ind_le,
sizeof(wake_ind_le));
@@ -4113,10 +4113,10 @@ static void brcmf_report_wowl_wakeind(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
}
if (wakeind & BRCMF_WOWL_PFN_FOUND) {
brcmf_dbg(INFO, "WOWL Wake indicator: BRCMF_WOWL_PFN_FOUND\n");
- timeout = wait_event_timeout(cfg->wowl.nd_data_wait,
- cfg->wowl.nd_data_completed,
- BRCMF_ND_INFO_TIMEOUT);
- if (!timeout)
+ time_left = wait_event_timeout(cfg->wowl.nd_data_wait,
+ cfg->wowl.nd_data_completed,
+ BRCMF_ND_INFO_TIMEOUT);
+ if (!time_left)
bphy_err(drvr, "No result for wowl net detect\n");
else
wakeup_data.net_detect = cfg->wowl.nd_info;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
2024-06-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout() Wolfram Sang
@ 2024-06-03 9:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2024-06-03 13:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-12 12:01 ` Kalle Valo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2024-06-03 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel
Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, brcm80211, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 934 bytes --]
On 6/3/2024 11:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
I feel this type of changes fall into the category of bike-shedding.
People should know how wait_event_timeout() works and then a variable
name does not really matter.
> Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.
But it may have useful side-effects to go over the code with fresh look.
Thanks.
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4219 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
2024-06-03 9:42 ` Arend van Spriel
@ 2024-06-03 13:15 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2024-06-03 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arend van Spriel
Cc: linux-kernel, Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, brcm80211,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl
> I feel this type of changes fall into the category of bike-shedding. People
I have two motivations for this change: One may be bike-shedding, yet
"if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT" looks stupid to me.
> should know how wait_event_timeout() works and then a variable name does not
> really matter.
And for a new developer, I am quite sure the change will help to
understand how wait_event-family() works. Especially given that
wait_event_interruptible() returns 0 if condition is true and
wait_event_interruptible_timeout() returns 0 if condition is false.
> > Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.
>
> But it may have useful side-effects to go over the code with fresh look.
:)
> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Thank you!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
2024-06-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-06-03 9:42 ` Arend van Spriel
@ 2024-06-12 12:01 ` Kalle Valo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2024-06-12 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: linux-kernel, Wolfram Sang, Arend van Spriel, linux-wireless,
brcm80211, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
4 patches applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.
158d5a1b3caa wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()
0c0668813cc0 wifi: mwl8k: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
a37f6947ff07 wifi: p54: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout()
a2ead3445a63 wifi: zd1211rw: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240603091541.8367-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-12 12:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-03 9:15 [PATCH 0/6] net: use 'time_left' instead of 'timeout' with wait_*() functions Wolfram Sang
2024-06-03 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout() Wolfram Sang
2024-06-03 9:42 ` Arend van Spriel
2024-06-03 13:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-12 12:01 ` Kalle Valo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox