* [Bridge] Distributed RSTP
@ 2009-10-07 20:22 NITIN SS
2009-10-09 6:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: NITIN SS @ 2009-10-07 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bridge
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 990 bytes --]
Hi,
I am new to this RSTP/Bridge group and currently planning on distributed
RSTP.
First of all, Distributed RSTP mean as, we will have 8 linux RSTPs and they
all will have the same Bridge ID.
As all bridges will have the same Bridge ID so I need to sync many variables
functions across all units.
Additionally there should be only one root port for all the eight bridges.
In this way there should be one master which would be maintaing bridge
variables and controlling bridge operations.
There is only point to point link between all bridges through master.
Additioanlly most of the RSTP state machines are port based so it looks
feasible.
As your guys are RSTP experts, so i think it would be the right place to get
suggestions/comments.
-What would be the limitations/complex Issues?
-Is it feasible?
At top level it looks like there would be lot of efforts with respect to
final outcome.
-Is there any implementation of distributed RSTP?
Appreciate your comments.
Regards,
Nitin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1262 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bridge] Distributed RSTP
2009-10-07 20:22 [Bridge] Distributed RSTP NITIN SS
@ 2009-10-09 6:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2009-10-09 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NITIN SS; +Cc: bridge
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:22:44 -0700
NITIN SS <hi.nitin2000@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to this RSTP/Bridge group and currently planning on distributed
> RSTP.
>
> First of all, Distributed RSTP mean as, we will have 8 linux RSTPs and they
> all will have the same Bridge ID.
So you plan to take a perfectly good spec 802.1d and break it.
Why?
> As all bridges will have the same Bridge ID so I need to sync many variables
> functions across all units.
You are off in never-never fantasy land. Stop and ask why are you
doing this? It is like the old joke: "Doctor it hurts when I hit
my head with my fist..."
> Additionally there should be only one root port for all the eight bridges.
> In this way there should be one master which would be maintaing bridge
> variables and controlling bridge operations.
> There is only point to point link between all bridges through master.
> Additioanlly most of the RSTP state machines are port based so it looks
> feasible.
>
> As your guys are RSTP experts, so i think it would be the right place to get
> suggestions/comments.
>
> -What would be the limitations/complex Issues?
> -Is it feasible?
> At top level it looks like there would be lot of efforts with respect to
> final outcome.
> -Is there any implementation of distributed RSTP?
>
> Appreciate your comments.
>
> Regards,
> Nitin
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-09 6:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-07 20:22 [Bridge] Distributed RSTP NITIN SS
2009-10-09 6:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox