From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, yangtiezhu@loongson.cn,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
kuba@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
ravenexp@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:43:30 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3118dc0d-a3af-9337-c897-2380062a8644@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea why "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" breaks the
> linux-bridge on s390?
Are we even sure this is s390 specific and doesn't happen on other
architectures with the same bridge setup?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 15:49 [Bridge] [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-06-24 15:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 2:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 5:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:39 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02 4:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 0:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18 0:43 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markward@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox