Re: [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)

[Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:08:11PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> dmesg attached
> [   14.438482] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered blocking state
> [   14.438485] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
> [   14.438635] device virbr0-nic entered promiscuous mode
> [   14.439654] umh: sub_info->path: /sbin/bridge-stp
> [   14.439656] /sbin/bridge-stp 
> [   14.439656] virbr0 
> [   14.439656] start 

OK so what we seem to want to debug is the umh call for:

/sbin/bridge-stp virbr0 start

> [   14.439734] == ret: 00
> [   14.439735] == KWIFEXITED(ret): 01
> [   14.439736] KWEXITSTATUS(ret): 0

Its not clear if this is the respective return value, but now
that we have a clue that this is the the only non-modprobe
call, we should have a clearer certainty that this is the
issue.

Indeed my patch "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used"
did modify bridge-stp in the following way:

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
index ba55851fe132..bdd94b45396b 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
@@ -133,14 +133,8 @@ static int br_stp_call_user(struct net_bridge *br, char *arg)
 
 	/* call userspace STP and report program errors */
 	rc = call_usermodehelper(BR_STP_PROG, argv, envp, UMH_WAIT_PROC);
-	if (rc > 0) {
-		if (rc & 0xff)
-			br_debug(br, BR_STP_PROG " received signal %d\n",
-				 rc & 0x7f);
-		else
-			br_debug(br, BR_STP_PROG " exited with code %d\n",
-				 (rc >> 8) & 0xff);
-	}
+	if (rc != 0)
+		br_debug(br, BR_STP_PROG " failed with exit code %d\n", rc);
 
 	return rc;
 }

If you look at this carefully though you'll notice that the change just
modifies *when* we issue the debug print. The more important relevant
part of the patch however was that we now do return a correct error
value when the call fails.

More importantly, depending on if an error or not we run the kernel STP
or userspace STP later:

static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
{
	int err = -ENOENT;

	if (net_eq(dev_net(br->dev), &init_net))
		err = br_stp_call_user(br, "start");

	if (err && err != -ENOENT)
		br_err(br, "failed to start userspace STP (%d)\n", err);

	spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);

	if (br->bridge_forward_delay < BR_MIN_FORWARD_DELAY)
		__br_set_forward_delay(br, BR_MIN_FORWARD_DELAY);
	else if (br->bridge_forward_delay > BR_MAX_FORWARD_DELAY)
		__br_set_forward_delay(br, BR_MAX_FORWARD_DELAY);

--------------------->  can you enable debug print for this to see what
--------------------->  you end up using?
	if (!err) {
		br->stp_enabled = BR_USER_STP;
		br_debug(br, "userspace STP started\n");
	} else {
		br->stp_enabled = BR_KERNEL_STP;
		br_debug(br, "using kernel STP\n");

		/* To start timers on any ports left in blocking */
		if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP)
			mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, jiffies + br->hello_time);
		br_port_state_selection(br);
	}
----------------->

	spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}