From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
To: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Bridge] bridge, vlan and *no* stp/bpdu
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:47:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D19BC9.6060702@navigue.com> (raw)
Hello list,
I've posted here about this before, but I realise that it may have been
assumed that the bridged vlans simply put a switch port in a blocking
state and left my question ignored. So to recap.
I have two tg3 interfaces named 'in' and 'out' and a bridge named 'br0'
My vlan trunk is on the 'in' side of the network, and set as in.2, in.3
... The 'out' side goes straight to an ipv4 gateway on untagged plain
ethernet.
Putting 'in.2' and 'out' on the bridge works quite well and is roughly
what I've been using so far.
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.00e081342870 no out
in.2
If I add in.3 to the bridge, trouble starts. The bridge keeps
forwarding packets just like it should, with the exception of ARP
replies from the gateway to machines in vlan 2. Machine that had ARPed
the gateway prior to adding in.3 to the bridge keep working fine.
Here's the strange thing however. Running a tcpdump on 'out' 'br0' or
in.2 shows me the arp requests *and replies* for the machines that do
not work, however, if I look on the wire leaving the 'in' interface
itself (using a hub and another box), the arp replies are nowhere to be
found.
So the arp replies get eaten *before* they make it onto the wire, but
*after* tcpdump saw them on in.2. It's driving me nuts... I thought it
might have to do with the tg3 hardware doing some funky vlan
acceleration, but I've seen the same on plain dumb NICs too.
I'm willing to pay for a solution to this... Or even for just someone
knowledgeable enough with the code taking interest in the issue.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-07 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-07 19:47 Jonathan Thibault [this message]
2008-03-07 20:08 ` [Bridge] bridge, vlan and *no* stp/bpdu Andy Gospodarek
[not found] ` <47D1B45F.7020409@navigue.com>
[not found] ` <bdfc5d6e0803071423ia2c794fn662a6e875ffafe09@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-08 16:26 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-09 7:36 ` richardvoigt
2008-03-09 15:53 ` Jonathan Thibault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-11 0:43 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-11 15:44 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-11 0:43 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-11 22:07 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-12 17:43 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-18 2:38 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-18 4:38 ` Malcolm Scott
2008-03-19 14:58 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-04-11 18:04 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-04-13 10:59 ` Malcolm Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D19BC9.6060702@navigue.com \
--to=jonathan@navigue.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox