Ethernet Bridge development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>
To: bridge@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] bridge, vlan and *no* stp/bpdu
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:53:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D407EA.6030004@navigue.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e59e6970803082336p383350ebm39d4403470ffd162@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, that's was in another mistakenly off-list reply.

Kernel is 2.6.24, been seeing this problem since 2.6.16 when I started 
the setup.

richardvoigt@gmail.com wrote:
>
> You still didn't tell us any version numbers, and I've got a similar
> setup which "works for me".  The only real difference is that my box
> routes between two logical bridges, and the bridged interfaces are
> multiple vlans in the same trunk.  I can even protect individual vlans
> from each other with netfilter rules.
>
> What if you routed "out" as a new vlan on the same cable as "in"?
>
>   
That's an interesting idea which I haven't tried yet.  An interesting 
tidbit is that there is a handful of machines in the lot which are 
affected right away (as soon as I add a second vlan interface to the 
bridge).  It may just be that they just have a very short arp timeout.  
I tried to find a pattern in their MAC addresses or hardware but there 
isn't really one.  I first assumed there was a problem with those 
machines but given that the ARP reply never gets to the trunk cable 
going their way, I concluded otherwise.

Thanks a lot for the help.  The fact that you have a setup that works 
gives me some confidence that I'm not just trying to do something insane ;)

Jonathan

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-09 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07 19:47 [Bridge] bridge, vlan and *no* stp/bpdu Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-07 20:08 ` Andy Gospodarek
     [not found]   ` <47D1B45F.7020409@navigue.com>
     [not found]     ` <bdfc5d6e0803071423ia2c794fn662a6e875ffafe09@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-08 16:26       ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-09  7:36         ` richardvoigt
2008-03-09 15:53           ` Jonathan Thibault [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-11  0:43 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-11 15:44 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-11  0:43 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-11 22:07 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-12 17:43 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-03-18  2:38 Leigh Sharpe
2008-03-18  4:38 ` Malcolm Scott
2008-03-19 14:58 ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-04-11 18:04   ` Jonathan Thibault
2008-04-13 10:59     ` Malcolm Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D407EA.6030004@navigue.com \
    --to=jonathan@navigue.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox