From: netdev@kapio-technology.com
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Kurt Kanzenbach" <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Claudiu Manoil" <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER"
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 17:38:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <766efaf94fcb6362c5ceb176ad7955f1@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9vgz4x/O+dIp+0/@shredder>
On 2023-02-02 17:11, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 08:28:36AM +0100, netdev@kapio-technology.com
> wrote:
>> On 2023-02-01 19:10, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 06:34:25PM +0100, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
>> > > To be able to add dynamic FDB entries to drivers from userspace, the
>> > > dynamic flag must be added when sending RTM_NEWNEIGH events down.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Hans J. Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
>> > > net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 2 ++
>> > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > > index ca0312b78294..aaf918d4ba67 100644
>> > > --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > > +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> > > @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info {
>> > > u8 added_by_user:1,
>> > > is_local:1,
>> > > locked:1,
>> > > + is_dyn:1,
>> > > offloaded:1;
>> > > };
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> > > index 7eb6fd5bb917..4420fcbbfdb2 100644
>> > > --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
>> > > net_bridge *br,
>> > > item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
>> > > item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
>> > > item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
>> > > + item->is_dyn = !test_bit(BR_FDB_STATIC, &fdb->flags) &&
>> >
>> > Why not 'is_static' and be consistent with the bridge flag like all the
>> > other fields?
>> >
>> > Regardless of how you name this field, it is irrelevant for
>> > 'SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE' notifications that all add FDB entries
>> > with the 'BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_EXT_LEARN' flag set, which makes
>> > 'BR_FDB_STATIC' irrelevant.
>> >
>> > > + item->added_by_user;
>> >
>> > Unclear why this is needed...
>> >
>>
>> The answer to those two questions lies in my earlier correspondences
>> (with
>> Oltean) on the RFC version.
>
> It is not up to me as a reviewer to dig up old versions of the patch
> and
> find out what was changed and why. It is up to you as the submitter of
> the patch to provide all this information in the patch posting. Please
> read:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
>
> Specifically:
>
> "Review comments or questions that do not lead to a code change should
> almost certainly bring about a comment or changelog entry so that the
> next reviewer better understands what is going on."
>
> And:
>
> "Other comments relevant only to the moment or the maintainer, not
> suitable for the permanent changelog, should also go here. A good
> example of such comments might be patch changelogs which describe what
> has changed between the v1 and v2 version of the patch.
>
> Please put this information after the --- line which separates the
> changelog from the rest of the patch. The version information is not
> part of the changelog which gets committed to the git tree. It is
> additional information for the reviewers."
>
> Thanks
Sorry about that. I thought it would be easily found...
On the first question please look here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230119134045.fqdt6zrna5x3iavt@skbuf/
On the second question it is what Oltean pointed out to me here...
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230118230135.szu6a7kvt2mjb3i5@skbuf/
Oltean says there:
"This is not true, because it assumes that DSA never called
port_fdb_add()
up until now for bridge FDB entries with the BR_FDB_STATIC flag unset,
which is incorrect (it did)."
Though as I see it, if it is only from the DSA layer on, the new
is_dynamic flag would not be set anyway in the case he references. And
as can be seen the change is in the bridge layer, as the rest is just
propagating the flag, but it ensures that to set this flag that it comes
from the user adding an FDB entry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 17:34 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] ATU and FDB synchronization on locked ports Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-30 17:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier Hans J. Schultz
2023-02-01 18:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-02 7:28 ` netdev
2023-02-02 16:11 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-02 16:38 ` netdev [this message]
2023-02-03 16:14 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-03 16:26 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-03 16:27 ` netdev
2023-02-03 17:06 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-01-30 17:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-30 17:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/5] drivers: net: dsa: add fdb entry flags incoming to switchcore drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-31 18:54 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-02 16:45 ` netdev
2023-02-03 8:17 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-03 18:41 ` netdev
2023-01-30 17:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: bridge: ensure FDB offloaded flag is handled as needed Hans J. Schultz
2023-02-01 18:24 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-02 7:32 ` netdev
2023-01-30 17:34 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implementation of dynamic ATU entries Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-31 18:56 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-02 17:00 ` netdev
2023-02-03 8:20 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-03 20:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-04 8:12 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-04 8:48 ` netdev
2023-02-06 16:02 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-14 21:14 ` Hans Schultz
2023-02-17 17:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-20 14:11 ` Simon Horman
2023-01-31 19:25 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] ATU and FDB synchronization on locked ports Ido Schimmel
2023-02-02 7:37 ` netdev
2023-02-02 15:43 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-02 16:19 ` netdev
2023-02-02 16:36 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-02-03 21:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02 17:18 ` netdev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=766efaf94fcb6362c5ceb176ad7955f1@kapio-technology.com \
--to=netdev@kapio-technology.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox