Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allow AT91/AVR32 support (Resend)
@ 2007-01-26  0:43 Ulf Samuelsson
  2007-01-26  0:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 " Ulf Samuelsson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2007-01-26  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Author:	Ulf Samuelsson
Date:	2007-01-25

Log:
1) Prepatory patch to allow AVR32/AT91 support.
2) Introduce AVR32 target architecture "avr32"
3) Introduce AVR32 target variants (AP7000/AP7010/AP7020) 
4) Introduce Download location for patches/packages for Atmel chips
(BR2_ATMEL_MIRROR)
5) Introduce Download location for Community AT91 patches/packages
(BR2_AT91_PATCH_MIRROR)

Modified:
	Config.in

Changeset
	Config.in

---------------
Resend with a bug fix

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Atmel_Config.in.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3253 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20070126/dddcaebc/attachment.bin 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 support (Resend)
  2007-01-26  0:43 [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allow AT91/AVR32 support (Resend) Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2007-01-26  0:47 ` Ulf Samuelsson
  2007-01-26  8:10   ` Bernhard Fischer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2007-01-26  0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> Author: Ulf Samuelsson
>> Date: 2007-01-25

Hmm, for everyone that is now confused:
I sent a first version, which had  a small problem.

Then sent a second (updated) version which was reported as sent, but
at the same time the email reader crashed and
I did not receive it, so I sent the (updated) version once again
with no changes to the patch.
At the same time the first (updated) version seems to have left my 
machine...


>>
>> Log:
>> 1) Prepatory patch to allow AVR32/AT91 support.
>> 2) Introduce AVR32 target architecture "avr32"
>> 3) Introduce AVR32 target variants (AP7000/AP7010/AP7020)
>> 4) Introduce Download location for patches/packages for Atmel chips
>> (BR2_ATMEL_MIRROR)
>> 5) Introduce Download location for Community AT91 patches/packages
>> (BR2_AT91_PATCH_MIRROR)
>>
>> Modified:
>> Config.in
>>
>> Changeset
>> Config.in
>>
>> ---------------
>> Resend with a bug fix
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Ulf Samuelsson
>>
>



>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot at uclibc.org
>> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 support (Resend)
  2007-01-26  0:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 " Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2007-01-26  8:10   ` Bernhard Fischer
  2007-01-26 17:14     ` Ulf Samuelsson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Fischer @ 2007-01-26  8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:47:11AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>> Author: Ulf Samuelsson
>>> Date: 2007-01-25
>
>Hmm, for everyone that is now confused:

like me ;)

Is this the correct version?
Please ping the one you consider ok, otherwise i'll apply this "resend"
one later today..
TIA,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 support (Resend)
  2007-01-26  8:10   ` Bernhard Fischer
@ 2007-01-26 17:14     ` Ulf Samuelsson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2007-01-26 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 01:47:11AM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>>>> Author: Ulf Samuelsson
>>>> Date: 2007-01-25
>>
>> Hmm, for everyone that is now confused:
>
> like me ;)

Anything marked (resend) is OK.


>
> Is this the correct version?
> Please ping the one you consider ok, otherwise i'll apply this
> "resend" one later today..
> TIA,

Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
ulf at atmel.com
GSM:  +46 (706) 22 44 57
Tel:     +46  (8) 441 54 22
Fax:     +46 (8) 441 54 29
Mail: Box 2033  174 02 Sundbyberg
Visit: Kavalleriv?gen 24
          174 58 Sundbyberg'
Sweden

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-26 17:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-26  0:43 [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allow AT91/AVR32 support (Resend) Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-26  0:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Prepatory patch to Config.in to allowAT91/AVR32 " Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-26  8:10   ` Bernhard Fischer
2007-01-26 17:14     ` Ulf Samuelsson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox