From: Jeremy Rosen <jeremy.rosen@openwide.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] swig: add symlink to /usr/bin/swig2.0
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:38:29 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1125534742.25538251.1411371509741.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140921200737.740f2bc0@free-electrons.com>
----- Mail original -----
> Dear J?r?my Rosen,
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:13:51 +0200, J?r?my Rosen wrote:
> > the cmake detection script provided with cmake will first look for
> > a
> > binary called swig2.0 then for a binary called swig
> >
> > swig-host only installs a binary called swig and gets overridden by
> > the
> > version installed by the host distro. This symlink prevents that
> > from
> > happening
>
> I don't understand the explanation: if it looks for a binary called
> swig, then where's the need to create a swig2.0 symbolic link? How a
> binary in $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin can get overridden by the version
> installed by the host distro?
>
The line in FindSwig.mk (part of the cmake package, not swig package)
find_program(SWIG_EXECUTABLE NAMES swig2.0 swig)
This will look in PATH for
* an executable called "swig2.0"
* if it is not found, an executable called "swig"
so if there is a "swig2.0" in /usr/bin it will be used instead of the
one called "swig" in $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin even if the PATH order says
otherwise.
currently, host-swig only installs $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/swig and the
debian package on my host only installs /usr/bin/swig2.0 thus the
problem.
(Note that the separate bump of cmake changes the cmake line above to
dealwith swig3.0 that has been updated since, but using
$(MAJOR_VERSION) deals with it properly)
> The SoB line is missing.
OK
>
> > diff --git a/package/swig/swig.mk b/package/swig/swig.mk
> > index 5efc81c..233e97d 100644
> > --- a/package/swig/swig.mk
> > +++ b/package/swig/swig.mk
> > @@ -15,4 +15,10 @@ HOST_SWIG_CONF_OPT = \
> > SWIG_LICENSE = GPLv3+ BSD-2c BSD-3c
> > SWIG_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE LICENSE-GPL LICENSE-UNIVERSITIES
> >
> > +define SWIG_INSTALL_SYMLINK
>
> Should be HOST_SWITCH_INSTALL_SYMLINK.
>
OK
> I've marked your patch as "Changes requested" in patchwork.
>
Ok, thx, I'll fix all that, rebase and resubmit
Thx for the review
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-22 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-19 7:13 [Buildroot] [PATCH] cmake : bump to version 3.0.2 Jérémy Rosen
2014-09-19 7:13 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] swig : bump to version 2.0.12 Jérémy Rosen
2014-09-21 18:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-19 7:13 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] swig: add symlink to /usr/bin/swig2.0 Jérémy Rosen
2014-09-21 18:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-22 7:38 ` Jeremy Rosen [this message]
2014-09-22 8:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-19 7:27 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] cmake : bump to version 3.0.2 Jeremy Rosen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1125534742.25538251.1411371509741.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr \
--to=jeremy.rosen@openwide.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox