[Buildroot] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: SDL_image, SDL_ttf & Co (libpng12.So bug)]]

[Buildroot] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: SDL_image, SDL_ttf & Co (libpng12.So bug)]]

[Claudio Leonel]

Hi,

I think so.
To be sure, I recompiled again from scratch and it compiled OK.
I have attached my current makefiles for SDL and SDL_image.
On the other hand, SDL and SDL_ttf are already working in
the target, but SDL_image is not. My test application in
the target freezes in graphic mode when I try to render
the image. I am still investigating the problem.

Regards,


> I have tried your "trick" for SDL_image compilation and even if I put the
> LDFLAGS you advised I always have the same link error (/usr/lib/libpng12.so pb)
> 
> Are you sure it was the only thing you changed ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Julien
> 
> Quoting Claudio Leonel <cls@elaxys.com.br>:
> 
>>>> I was using buildroot version 20061111 and managed to
>>>> compile SDL_image including the following flags (LDFLAGS) for the
>>>> linker.
>>>>
>>>> $(SDL_IMAGE_DIR)/.compiled: $(SDL_IMAGE_DIR)/.configured
>>>> 	$(MAKE) LDFLAGS=$(STAGING_DIR)/lib/libpng12.so -C $(SDL_IMAGE_DIR)
>>>> 	touch $(SDL_IMAGE_DIR)/.compiled
>>>>
>>>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sdl_image.mk
Url: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20061129/57dd1c57/attachment.pot 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sdl.mk
Url: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20061129/57dd1c57/attachment.asc 

[Buildroot] [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: SDL_image, SDL_ttf & Co (libpng12.So bug)]]

[Pavel Roskin]

On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:52 -0200, Claudio Leonel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think so.
> To be sure, I recompiled again from scratch and it compiled OK.
> I have attached my current makefiles for SDL and SDL_image.

It would be much friendlier to others if you sent the patches instead.
The patches either preserve changes made by others or fail.  They don't
undo changes made by others.  Patches make the intent of the change
easier to understand.

Others can make a patch from the whole files if they know your base
version.  But they cannot know if the patch is changing accidentally
something that the author didn't intend to change.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin