Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
@ 2009-01-14 11:20 Sven Neumann
  2009-01-14 11:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sven Neumann @ 2009-01-14 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Hi,

I am new to this list and also quite new to buildroot and I wonder
what's the preferred procedure to get new packages included and packages
updated. I have filed bug reports at bugs.busybox.net [1], but noticed
that the bug-tracker does not send out notification emails by default.
Should I also notify you on this list or will bug reports be dealed with
at some point without further action?


Sven

[1]  https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=35

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
  2009-01-14 11:20 [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included Sven Neumann
@ 2009-01-14 11:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
  2009-01-15 14:07   ` Sven Neumann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2009-01-14 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

>>>>> "Sven" == Sven Neumann <s.neumann@phase-zero.de> writes:

Hi,

 Sven> I am new to this list and also quite new to buildroot and I
 Sven> wonder what's the preferred procedure to get new packages
 Sven> included and packages updated. I have filed bug reports at
 Sven> bugs.busybox.net [1], but noticed that the bug-tracker does not
 Sven> send out notification emails by default.  Should I also notify
 Sven> you on this list or will bug reports be dealed with at some
 Sven> point without further action?

I've seen your patch, but haven't had time for a closer review yet.
We're trying to stabilize the tree and get a release out by February,
so it won't get committed until then.

Personally I prefer to see patches on the list, as that's easier for
reviewing, but the bugtracker is good for not forgetting about an
issue as well.

I'll look into getting bugtracker mails sent to the list as well.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
  2009-01-14 11:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2009-01-15 14:07   ` Sven Neumann
  2009-01-15 14:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
  2009-01-15 21:08     ` Ulf Samuelsson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sven Neumann @ 2009-01-15 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Hi,

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:33 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

> I've seen your patch, but haven't had time for a closer review yet.
> We're trying to stabilize the tree and get a release out by February,
> so it won't get committed until then.

That's of course sad as it would like to see these packages included in
that release if possible. I have now attached an updated patch with some
cleanups and fixes to the bug report. Perhaps it is useful for anyone.

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=35


Sven

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
  2009-01-15 14:07   ` Sven Neumann
@ 2009-01-15 14:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
  2009-01-15 21:08     ` Ulf Samuelsson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2009-01-15 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

>>>>> "Sven" == Sven Neumann <s.neumann@phase-zero.de> writes:

 Sven> Hi,
 Sven> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:33 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

 >> I've seen your patch, but haven't had time for a closer review yet.
 >> We're trying to stabilize the tree and get a release out by February,
 >> so it won't get committed until then.

 Sven> That's of course sad as it would like to see these packages included in
 Sven> that release if possible. I have now attached an updated patch with some
 Sven> cleanups and fixes to the bug report. Perhaps it is useful for anyone.

Sorry, that's ofcourse understandable, but my no1 priority is really
to get a release out by February. I'll review your patch and commit as
soon as I can, but I'm not giving any promises.

Even if it doesn't make it for this release, it'll be in the next
instead (scheduled for this Summer).

The other developers are more than welcome to help with the reviewing
process.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
  2009-01-15 14:07   ` Sven Neumann
  2009-01-15 14:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2009-01-15 21:08     ` Ulf Samuelsson
  2009-01-16  9:37       ` Sven Neumann
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2009-01-15 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

tor 2009-01-15 klockan 15:07 +0100 skrev Sven Neumann:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:33 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> 
> > I've seen your patch, but haven't had time for a closer review yet.
> > We're trying to stabilize the tree and get a release out by February,
> > so it won't get committed until then.
> 
> That's of course sad as it would like to see these packages included in
> that release if possible. I have now attached an updated patch with some
> cleanups and fixes to the bug report. Perhaps it is useful for anyone.
> 
> https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=35

I looked at the patch, and there are still some issues.
"libsoup" has version 2.4.1 but is downloaded
from a version "2.2" subdirectory.

Anything uPnP related should IMO be in the Networking 
part of Config.

I can fix issues like that.

At the moment, glib does not build for me, since 
I built libiconv which will stop glib from building
but I will start from scratch and test again
and try to get glib to build.


BR
Ulf Samuelsson


> 
> 
> Sven
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included
  2009-01-15 21:08     ` Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2009-01-16  9:37       ` Sven Neumann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sven Neumann @ 2009-01-16  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Hi,

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 22:08 +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:

> > https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=35
> 
> I looked at the patch, and there are still some issues.
> "libsoup" has version 2.4.1 but is downloaded
> from a version "2.2" subdirectory.

You are right, that should be changed to
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsoup/2.4/

> Anything uPnP related should IMO be in the Networking 
> part of Config.

OK, I wasn't certain where I should put it. I will attach a patch later
that addresses this.


Sven

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-16  9:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-14 11:20 [Buildroot] preferred procedure to get new packages included Sven Neumann
2009-01-14 11:33 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-15 14:07   ` Sven Neumann
2009-01-15 14:14     ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-15 21:08     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-16  9:37       ` Sven Neumann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox