[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: multimedia/alsa-lib python

[Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>]

m?n 2009-01-26 klockan 16:40 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes:
> 
>  ulf> http://www.alsa-project.org/
>  ulf> +
>  ulf> +config BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB_PYTHON
>  ulf> +	bool "Python support for alsa-lib"
>  ulf> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB
>  ulf> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON
> 
>  Peter> It would probably be goodt to add a 'default BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON' line,
>  Peter> so it defaults to enabled if you have python support, and false
>  Peter> otherwise.
> 
>  Peter> Alternatively it should depend on BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON and just be
>  Peter> default y, as it's probably pretty unlikely someone wants python
>  Peter> support in alsa without having python enabled in the first place.
> 
>  Peter> The 2nd option seems cleanest to me, what do you think?
> 

I think feedback was that people would like the option to build alsa-lib
WITHOUT python support even if python was on the target.
Adding python to alsa-lib means a fat library is added to the fs.

BR
Ulf Samuelsson