From: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] target/device/Atmel kernel patches
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:04:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233266697.4147.56.camel@elrond.atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fxj2q6hc.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
tor 2009-01-29 klockan 20:04 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> writes:
>
> >> No, but we're doing a bunch of cleanups now - And as I mentioned before,
> >> the arch-arm directory seems a bit extreme as it is.
>
> Ulf> I much prefer that we avoid doing this under time pressure
> Ulf> and come to an agreememt on how to do a good implementation
> Ulf> after the first release.
>
> Ok, but I guess we can atleast remove the support for 2.6.21.1 (as
> there's 2.6.21.5) and 2.6.26-rc3 (as there's 2.6.26) ?
OK, go ahead, but you need to update the
arch-at91/Config.in.linux.patches as well.
> >> I don't think adding a bunch of special case handling to buildroot to
> >> download AT91 patches from somewhere is a better solution. We should
> >> rather generalize the setup so you can handle it outside BR and just
> >> point BR to a repo or a directory full of patches.
> >>
>
> Ulf> I am for generic solutions, but not at the expense of ease of use.
> Ulf> That is why it needs some pondering, before a solution is selected.
>
> I'm not for ease of use over everything else, it also has to be
> manageable for the developers - But yes, the easier we can make it to
> use at the same time, the better.
>
BR
Ulf Samuelsson
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-26 21:03 [Buildroot] target/device/Atmel kernel patches Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-26 21:29 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-26 21:37 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-26 22:19 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-27 9:25 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-29 14:33 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-29 14:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-29 15:27 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-29 16:03 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-29 16:28 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-29 16:54 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-29 18:31 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2009-01-29 19:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-01-29 22:04 ` Ulf Samuelsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233266697.4147.56.camel@elrond.atmel.com \
--to=ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox