* [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1
@ 2015-05-26 10:38 Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-05-26 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
host-mtd build fails with gcc 5.1:
error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_key?
error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_value?
Indeed, both functions are defined twice - once in the header and once in the
source file. This is permitted in C11 (and maybe in C99).
Add a patch sent to upstream:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
---
Changes v2 -> v3:
- Add Sob and URL to patch description (Baruch Siach)
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Use (identical) patch sent upstream
---
.../0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
diff --git a/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch b/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ae691e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+From patchwork Sat May 2 12:38:06 2015
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Subject: mkfs.ubifs: Fix build with gcc 5.1
+From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
+X-Patchwork-Id: 467254
+Message-Id: <1430570286-30434-1-git-send-email-bernhard@bwalle.de>
+To: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
+Cc: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
+Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 14:38:06 +0200
+
+In gcc 5.1, the default C standard which is used to compile a C file,
+has changed from gnu89 to gnu11. This changed the meaning of 'extern
+inline'. See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html.
+
+In mkfs.ubifs, this leads to multiple definitions of
+hashtable_iterator_key and -hashtable_iterator_value. I think the most
+pragmatic way to fix the issue is to replace 'extern inline' with
+'static inline' here.
+
+Fetch from:
+https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
+
+Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
+Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
+---
+ mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c | 12 ------------
+ mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h | 4 ++--
+ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
+index 24f4dde..d102453 100644
+--- a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
++++ b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
+@@ -35,18 +35,6 @@ hashtable_iterator(struct hashtable *h)
+ }
+
+ /*****************************************************************************/
+-/* key - return the key of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
+-/* value - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
+-
+-void *
+-hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
+-{ return i->e->k; }
+-
+-void *
+-hashtable_iterator_value(struct hashtable_itr *i)
+-{ return i->e->v; }
+-
+-/*****************************************************************************/
+ /* advance - advance the iterator to the next element
+ * returns zero if advanced to end of table */
+
+diff --git a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
+index 87a97eb..5c94a04 100644
+--- a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
++++ b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
+@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ hashtable_iterator(struct hashtable *h);
+ /* hashtable_iterator_key
+ * - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
+
+-extern inline void *
++static inline void *
+ hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
+ {
+ return i->e->k;
+@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
+ /*****************************************************************************/
+ /* value - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
+
+-extern inline void *
++static inline void *
+ hashtable_iterator_value(struct hashtable_itr *i)
+ {
+ return i->e->v;
--
2.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1
2015-05-26 10:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1 Jörg Krause
@ 2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 21:54 ` rdkehn at yahoo.com
2015-07-11 8:40 ` Romain Naour
2015-07-11 10:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-05-29 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi all,
On Di, 2015-05-26 at 12:38 +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> host-mtd build fails with gcc 5.1:
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_key?
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_value?
>
> Indeed, both functions are defined twice - once in the header and
> once in the
> source file. This is permitted in C11 (and maybe in C99).
>
> Add a patch sent to upstream:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> - Add Sob and URL to patch description (Baruch Siach)
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - Use (identical) patch sent upstream
> ---
Patch is accepted upstream now. I suggest to add this patch to 2015.05.
Best regards
J?rg Krause
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
@ 2015-05-29 21:54 ` rdkehn at yahoo.com
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rdkehn at yahoo.com @ 2015-05-29 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi All,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:39:09PM +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Di, 2015-05-26 at 12:38 +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> > host-mtd build fails with gcc 5.1:
> > error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_key?
> > error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_value?
> >
> > Indeed, both functions are defined twice - once in the header and
> > once in the
> > source file. This is permitted in C11 (and maybe in C99).
> >
> > Add a patch sent to upstream:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Tested-by: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@yahoo.com>
> > ---
> > Changes v2 -> v3:
> > - Add Sob and URL to patch description (Baruch Siach)
> >
> > Changes v1 -> v2:
> > - Use (identical) patch sent upstream
> > ---
>
> Patch is accepted upstream now. I suggest to add this patch to 2015.05.
Tested on Arch Linux host with GCC 5.1.0 and target
arm-buildroot-linux-gnueabihf toolchain. Buildroot master
a4a7aeed539631a91cae2c00dec4d20ccc6dda31.
Regards,
...doug
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1
2015-05-26 10:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1 Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
@ 2015-07-11 8:40 ` Romain Naour
2015-07-11 10:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Romain Naour @ 2015-07-11 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Jorg,
Le 26/05/2015 12:38, J?rg Krause a ?crit :
> host-mtd build fails with gcc 5.1:
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_key?
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_value?
>
> Indeed, both functions are defined twice - once in the header and once in the
> source file. This is permitted in C11 (and maybe in C99).
>
> Add a patch sent to upstream:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Build tested with Fedora 22 host and gcc 5.1.1.
Tested-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
Best regards,
Romain Naour
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> - Add Sob and URL to patch description (Baruch Siach)
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - Use (identical) patch sent upstream
> ---
> .../0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
>
> diff --git a/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch b/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7ae691e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/mtd/0005-mkfs.ubifs-Fix-build-with-gcc-5.1.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> +From patchwork Sat May 2 12:38:06 2015
> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> +MIME-Version: 1.0
> +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> +Subject: mkfs.ubifs: Fix build with gcc 5.1
> +From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
> +X-Patchwork-Id: 467254
> +Message-Id: <1430570286-30434-1-git-send-email-bernhard@bwalle.de>
> +To: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
> +Cc: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
> +Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 14:38:06 +0200
> +
> +In gcc 5.1, the default C standard which is used to compile a C file,
> +has changed from gnu89 to gnu11. This changed the meaning of 'extern
> +inline'. See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html.
> +
> +In mkfs.ubifs, this leads to multiple definitions of
> +hashtable_iterator_key and -hashtable_iterator_value. I think the most
> +pragmatic way to fix the issue is to replace 'extern inline' with
> +'static inline' here.
> +
> +Fetch from:
> +https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@bwalle.de>
> +Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> +---
> + mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c | 12 ------------
> + mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h | 4 ++--
> + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
> +index 24f4dde..d102453 100644
> +--- a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
> ++++ b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.c
> +@@ -35,18 +35,6 @@ hashtable_iterator(struct hashtable *h)
> + }
> +
> + /*****************************************************************************/
> +-/* key - return the key of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
> +-/* value - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
> +-
> +-void *
> +-hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
> +-{ return i->e->k; }
> +-
> +-void *
> +-hashtable_iterator_value(struct hashtable_itr *i)
> +-{ return i->e->v; }
> +-
> +-/*****************************************************************************/
> + /* advance - advance the iterator to the next element
> + * returns zero if advanced to end of table */
> +
> +diff --git a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
> +index 87a97eb..5c94a04 100644
> +--- a/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
> ++++ b/mkfs.ubifs/hashtable/hashtable_itr.h
> +@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ hashtable_iterator(struct hashtable *h);
> + /* hashtable_iterator_key
> + * - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
> +
> +-extern inline void *
> ++static inline void *
> + hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
> + {
> + return i->e->k;
> +@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ hashtable_iterator_key(struct hashtable_itr *i)
> + /*****************************************************************************/
> + /* value - return the value of the (key,value) pair at the current position */
> +
> +-extern inline void *
> ++static inline void *
> + hashtable_iterator_value(struct hashtable_itr *i)
> + {
> + return i->e->v;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1
2015-05-26 10:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1 Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
2015-07-11 8:40 ` Romain Naour
@ 2015-07-11 10:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-07-11 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
On Tue, 26 May 2015 12:38:09 +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> host-mtd build fails with gcc 5.1:
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_key?
> error: redefinition of ?hashtable_iterator_value?
>
> Indeed, both functions are defined twice - once in the header and once in the
> source file. This is permitted in C11 (and maybe in C99).
>
> Add a patch sent to upstream:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/467254/
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> - Add Sob and URL to patch description (Baruch Siach)
Applied, thanks.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-11 10:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-26 10:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mtd: add patch to fix host build error with gcc 5.1 Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Jörg Krause
2015-05-29 21:54 ` rdkehn at yahoo.com
2015-07-11 8:40 ` Romain Naour
2015-07-11 10:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox