* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled @ 2015-07-30 19:45 Brendan Heading 2015-08-02 22:14 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-08-19 11:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Brendan Heading @ 2015-07-30 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Fixes the following : http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/675df26d7b47e02bad0b22f3e1cb404076a84a91/ http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/003c4313676cc79c72a9296159ff63dce177f079/ http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/86bd9fd83278a5468856f4abf700df57749d8e09/ http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/97205d8fce8d0851208d167fc3fc7ccce40d391a/ http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1764c8f7f84fc5bad950fdb41ecadff571ceb36b/ http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e733cb648398df7efd7ccae6493af3c92713a9bd/ I'm submitting this as RFC as it seems strange that I've come across this only now, but I don't see how libpthsem ever cross compiled in its current form. During the configure stage, libpthsem attempts to compile and run an executable to detect capabilities such as which direction the stack grows, behaviour of setjmp, etc. Obviously these fail to execute on non-Intel architectures, leading to defaults which cause the build to fail even on architectures where libpthsem is supposed to work. I've tested mipsel, sparcv8 and aarch64 here but I expect it will fail for all the other non-Intel architectures too. There are flags to force some (but not all) of these settings to certain fallbacks. It's not clear, without access to each of these architectures, what the correct default fallback settings should be. This patch therefore disables libpthsem and its dependents on non-Intel architectures. Signed-off-by: Brendan Heading <brendanheading@gmail.com> --- package/bcusdk/Config.in | 3 +++ package/gnupg2/Config.in | 3 +++ package/libpthsem/Config.in | 2 ++ package/linknx/Config.in | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/package/bcusdk/Config.in b/package/bcusdk/Config.in index 72deef1..a712941 100644 --- a/package/bcusdk/Config.in +++ b/package/bcusdk/Config.in @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BCUSDK bool "bcusdk" depends on BR2_USE_MMU # libpthsem depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP + # libpthsem cannot be sensibly cross compiled + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBPTHSEM select BR2_PACKAGE_ARGP_STANDALONE if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC help @@ -22,4 +24,5 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BCUSDK comment "bcusdk needs a toolchain w/ C++" depends on BR2_USE_MMU + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP diff --git a/package/gnupg2/Config.in b/package/gnupg2/Config.in index e246fd7..0a9dd30 100644 --- a/package/gnupg2/Config.in +++ b/package/gnupg2/Config.in @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ comment "gnupg2 needs a toolchain w/ dynamic library" depends on BR2_USE_MMU depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 config BR2_PACKAGE_GNUPG2 bool "gnupg2" @@ -13,6 +14,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_GNUPG2 select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBPTHSEM_COMPAT select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBICONV if !BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE depends on BR2_USE_MMU # libassuan + # libpthsem cannot be sensibly cross compiled + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS help GnuPG is the GNU project's complete and free implementation diff --git a/package/libpthsem/Config.in b/package/libpthsem/Config.in index 3219de1..6ebc173 100644 --- a/package/libpthsem/Config.in +++ b/package/libpthsem/Config.in @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBPTHSEM bool "libpthsem" depends on BR2_USE_MMU # fork() + # libpthsem cannot be sensibly cross compiled + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 help GNU pth is a user mode multi threading library. pthsem is an extend version, with support for semaphores added. diff --git a/package/linknx/Config.in b/package/linknx/Config.in index 9982f31..c2ea713 100644 --- a/package/linknx/Config.in +++ b/package/linknx/Config.in @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LINKNX select BR2_PACKAGE_ARGP_STANDALONE if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP depends on BR2_USE_MMU # libpthsem + # libpthsem cannot be sensibly cross compiled + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 help Linknx is an automation platform providing high level functionalities to EIB/KNX installation. @@ -12,4 +14,5 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_LINKNX comment "linknx needs a toolchain w/ C++" depends on BR2_USE_MMU + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP -- 2.4.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled 2015-07-30 19:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled Brendan Heading @ 2015-08-02 22:14 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-08-02 22:39 ` Brendan Heading 2015-08-19 11:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-08-02 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Brendan, All, On 2015-07-30 20:45 +0100, Brendan Heading spake thusly: > Fixes the following : > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/675df26d7b47e02bad0b22f3e1cb404076a84a91/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/003c4313676cc79c72a9296159ff63dce177f079/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/86bd9fd83278a5468856f4abf700df57749d8e09/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/97205d8fce8d0851208d167fc3fc7ccce40d391a/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1764c8f7f84fc5bad950fdb41ecadff571ceb36b/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e733cb648398df7efd7ccae6493af3c92713a9bd/ > > I'm submitting this as RFC as it seems strange that I've come across this > only now, but I don't see how libpthsem ever cross compiled in its current > form. I've tested the first reported build failure... And it builds fine for me... :-/ Not to say that the result is correct, just that I can't reproduce the build failure. > During the configure stage, libpthsem attempts to compile and run an > executable to detect capabilities such as which direction the stack grows, > behaviour of setjmp, etc. Obviously these fail to execute on non-Intel > architectures, leading to defaults which cause the build to fail even > on architectures where libpthsem is supposed to work. > > I've tested mipsel, sparcv8 and aarch64 here but I expect it will fail > for all the other non-Intel architectures too. > > There are flags to force some (but not all) of these settings to certain > fallbacks. It's not clear, without access to each of these architectures, > what the correct default fallback settings should be. > > This patch therefore disables libpthsem and its dependents on non-Intel > architectures. That's definitiely not acceptable that we have to disable it. All those tests that can not be determined at build time because they need to run programs should be forced-guessed,with the appropriate ac_cv variables. See for example the atk package, which has quite a bunch of those; package/atk/atk.mk Excerpt; ATK_CONF_ENV = \ ac_cv_func_posix_getpwuid_r=yes \ glib_cv_stack_grows=no \ glib_cv_uscore=no \ ac_cv_func_strtod=yes \ ac_fsusage_space=yes \ fu_cv_sys_stat_statfs2_bsize=yes \ ac_cv_func_closedir_void=no \ [...] Which should be done in this case, too. ---- For the records, I've diffed the config.log from the first build failure with the config.log I git on my machine, and there are a few interesting differences ('-' is mine, '+' is the autobuild failure): First, it's not using the same awk implementation: -configure:2743: found /usr/bin/gawk -configure:2754: result: gawk +configure:2757: result: no +configure:2727: checking for mawk +configure:2743: found /usr/bin/mawk +configure:2754: result: mawk Second, running programs fail with different errors; the error on my machine is probably the dynamic linker /lib/ld.so whinning that it can not recognise the exectuable (expected, it's PPC, my machine is x86_64), while the error on the autobuilder is probably becasue the dynamic linker does not exist (probably because it is not in the same location): -./configure: line 1828: ./conftest: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error -configure:12578: $? = 126 -configure: program exited with status 126 +./configure: line 1828: ./conftest: No such file or directory +configure:12578: $? = 127 +configure: program exited with status 127 Third, and much more interesting, is the mis-detection of the sjlj to use: -configure:14176: result: yes: ssjlj +configure:14176: result: yes: sjljlx [--SNIP--] -configure:15098: result: decision on mctx implementation... sjlj/ssjlj/sas +configure:15098: result: decision on mctx implementation... sjlj/sjljlx/none [--SNIP--] -PTH_MCTX_ID='sjlj/ssjlj/sas' +PTH_MCTX_ID='sjlj/sjljlx/none' Ah, and my system has my login shell set to /bin/bash , not /bin/sh . Now, if you look closely (not too closely, even!), you'll see that those errors are all occuring on a single autobuilder, the one from Nathaniel: http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=libpthsem-2.0.8 So, I guess something from the environment causes the build failures. Not to say that we should not fix them, just that probably the proposed fix is not the correct solution... Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled 2015-08-02 22:14 ` Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-08-02 22:39 ` Brendan Heading 2015-08-03 15:11 ` Brendan Heading 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Brendan Heading @ 2015-08-02 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot > I've tested the first reported build failure... And it builds fine for > me... :-/ > > Not to say that the result is correct, just that I can't reproduce the > build failure. Yann, Thanks for reviewing my patch. I knew it would not fly, so I put it as RFC to start a discussion on the best approach. > All those tests that can not be determined at build time because they > need to run programs should be forced-guessed,with the appropriate ac_cv > variables. > > See for example the atk package, which has quite a bunch of those; > package/atk/atk.mk Noted. I agree that this is a better approach. > Now, if you look closely (not too closely, even!), you'll see that those > errors are all occuring on a single autobuilder, the one from Nathaniel: > > http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=libpthsem-2.0.8 > > So, I guess something from the environment causes the build failures. Yes, I agree. I found the same problem that you did (issues with reproducibility). Sometimes you get "Exec format error", others "file not found" (which happens when there is a dynamic link problem). Strangely, I could reproduce it on some architectures but not others. But irrespective of this - the way that it is detecting features cannot work in a cross-compiled environment. So I didn't waste a lot of time characterising this in detail. The big problem is the misdetection of the sjlj as you noted. To fix this properly we're going to have to go through all the arches and figure out what the correct value is .. Brendan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled 2015-08-02 22:39 ` Brendan Heading @ 2015-08-03 15:11 ` Brendan Heading 2015-08-03 16:38 ` Yann E. MORIN 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Brendan Heading @ 2015-08-03 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot >> All those tests that can not be determined at build time because they >> need to run programs should be forced-guessed,with the appropriate ac_cv >> variables. >> >> See for example the atk package, which has quite a bunch of those; >> package/atk/atk.mk > > Noted. I agree that this is a better approach. Yann, [cc Thomas, list] I thought about this a bit more today. The state of play, right now, is that we can't be completely sure that cross-compiling libpthsem will work correctly. We know for sure that on several architectures it definitely does not work. In other cases it may appear to compile, by accident, but there's no way to be sure that it works at run time. Of course this isn't buildroot's fault. I don't have hardware available to test the right force-guess values, so I don't think I'm the right person to fix it. Moreover, even with the right hardware, any bugs caused by using the wrong force-guess value could be very subtle. Maybe someone else can solve this, but so far, nobody has, and these packages must have been broken for quite a long time now (years ?). So, given that there is no interest in the architectures, and there is nobody with time to fix the problems properly, isn't there a case for explicitly disabling libpthsem (and its dependents) for all cross-compiled builds ? Then, when someone comes along to complain, or even better proposes a patch, we can selectively re-enable the configurations that work ? Just my two cents .. since as things stand right now this package and related packages are just adding noise in the autobuild logs, and it might save time for people if the erroneous cases where expressly disabled, rather than giving the false impression that it works and is a supportable configuration. regards Brendan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled 2015-08-03 15:11 ` Brendan Heading @ 2015-08-03 16:38 ` Yann E. MORIN 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-08-03 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Brendan, All, On 2015-08-03 16:11 +0100, Brendan Heading spake thusly: > >> All those tests that can not be determined at build time because they > >> need to run programs should be forced-guessed,with the appropriate ac_cv > >> variables. > >> > >> See for example the atk package, which has quite a bunch of those; > >> package/atk/atk.mk > > > > Noted. I agree that this is a better approach. > > I thought about this a bit more today. > > The state of play, right now, is that we can't be completely sure that > cross-compiling libpthsem will work correctly. We know for sure that > on several architectures it definitely does not work. In other cases > it may appear to compile, by accident, but there's no way to be sure > that it works at run time. Of course this isn't buildroot's fault. What are those archs which libpthsem does *not* support by design? I.e. is it because there are arch-specific assembly code which is not ported to some archs? Or because of some requirements (like an MMU or some such)? Other reasons? > I don't have hardware available to test the right force-guess values, > so I don't think I'm the right person to fix it. Moreover, even with > the right hardware, any bugs caused by using the wrong force-guess > value could be very subtle. Maybe someone else can solve this, but so > far, nobody has, and these packages must have been broken for quite a > long time now (years ?). Well, the problem can be quite easily solved. Nowadays, virtually all architectures have the their stack all growing down (or is it up? I never remember, but AFAIK, all archs in Buildroot are in the same direction) so we can just skip over the test and force-guess it. I guess a lot of the other tests can be just answered the same. Again, pretty much all architectures nowadays are very similar in their "standard" behaviour anyway. There might be a few exceptions for some corner-cases tests but overall, hard-coding them would just be a matter of identifying tho special cases. However, it does not really matter if you do not have access to the hardware just to decide the force-guess for those tests. And thos you don't know or can't find the answer fo, just say so in the commit log. Some knowledgeable individual will step up and tell you. > So, given that there is no interest in the architectures, and there is > nobody with time to fix the problems properly, isn't there a case for > explicitly disabling libpthsem (and its dependents) for all > cross-compiled builds ? Then, when someone comes along to complain, or > even better proposes a patch, we can selectively re-enable the > configurations that work ? Well, there are a few packages that need libpthsem, of which gnupg2, so it would be a shame and quite a loss to have to make without those packages, especialy gnupg2... Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled 2015-07-30 19:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled Brendan Heading 2015-08-02 22:14 ` Yann E. MORIN @ 2015-08-19 11:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-08-19 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Brendan, On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:45:30 +0100, Brendan Heading wrote: > Fixes the following : > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/675df26d7b47e02bad0b22f3e1cb404076a84a91/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/003c4313676cc79c72a9296159ff63dce177f079/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/86bd9fd83278a5468856f4abf700df57749d8e09/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/97205d8fce8d0851208d167fc3fc7ccce40d391a/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1764c8f7f84fc5bad950fdb41ecadff571ceb36b/ > http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e733cb648398df7efd7ccae6493af3c92713a9bd/ > > I'm submitting this as RFC as it seems strange that I've come across this > only now, but I don't see how libpthsem ever cross compiled in its current > form. > > During the configure stage, libpthsem attempts to compile and run an > executable to detect capabilities such as which direction the stack grows, > behaviour of setjmp, etc. Obviously these fail to execute on non-Intel > architectures, leading to defaults which cause the build to fail even > on architectures where libpthsem is supposed to work. > > I've tested mipsel, sparcv8 and aarch64 here but I expect it will fail > for all the other non-Intel architectures too. > > There are flags to force some (but not all) of these settings to certain > fallbacks. It's not clear, without access to each of these architectures, > what the correct default fallback settings should be. > > This patch therefore disables libpthsem and its dependents on non-Intel > architectures. > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Heading <brendanheading@gmail.com> I don't think this is the right solution, as Yann noted. I've posted a different patch, which is shorter and allows libpthsem to be built on all architectures, after doing a more in-depth analysis of the build problem. See: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508707/ Consequently, I've marked your patch as Rejected in patchwork. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-19 11:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-07-30 19:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC 1/1] package/libpthsem: cannot be sanely cross-compiled Brendan Heading 2015-08-02 22:14 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-08-02 22:39 ` Brendan Heading 2015-08-03 15:11 ` Brendan Heading 2015-08-03 16:38 ` Yann E. MORIN 2015-08-19 11:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox