* [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/boost: fix space tabs
2015-12-11 13:57 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 13:57 ` Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 14:48 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-12-11 13:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2 Jörg Krause
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-12-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
---
package/boost/Config.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/boost/Config.in b/package/boost/Config.in
index cffaf6e..97d0802 100644
--- a/package/boost/Config.in
+++ b/package/boost/Config.in
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
|| BR2_powerpc || BR2_x86_64)
config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE
- bool "boost-coroutine"
- depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
+ bool "boost-coroutine"
+ depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_DATE_TIME
bool "boost-date_time"
--
2.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 13:57 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 13:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/boost: fix space tabs Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 13:57 ` Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 15:08 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-12-11 14:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Vicente Olivert Riera
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-12-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Coroutine2 is a new (C++14) library added in boost 1.59.0. We also add
coroutine2 to the '--without-libraries' configuration flag for the host
variant.
Build successfully tested with Arago ARMv5 2011.09 - a gcc v4.5.3 toolchain.
Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
---
package/boost/Config.in | 4 ++++
package/boost/boost.mk | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/boost/Config.in b/package/boost/Config.in
index 97d0802..83f6871 100644
--- a/package/boost/Config.in
+++ b/package/boost/Config.in
@@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE
bool "boost-coroutine"
depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
+config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2
+ bool "boost-coroutine2"
+ depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
+
config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_DATE_TIME
bool "boost-date_time"
diff --git a/package/boost/boost.mk b/package/boost/boost.mk
index 2f23fe1..0161d68 100644
--- a/package/boost/boost.mk
+++ b/package/boost/boost.mk
@@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ HOST_BOOST_DEPENDENCIES =
# keep host variant as minimal as possible
HOST_BOOST_FLAGS = --without-icu \
--without-libraries=$(subst $(space),$(comma),atomic chrono context \
- coroutine date_time exception filesystem graph graph_parallel \
- iostreams locale log math mpi program_options python random regex \
- serialization signals system test thread timer wave)
+ coroutine coroutine2 date_time exception filesystem graph \
+ graph_parallel iostreams locale log math mpi program_options python \
+ random regex serialization signals system test thread timer wave)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_ATOMIC),,atomic)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CHRONO),,chrono)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTAINER),,container)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT),,context)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE),,coroutine)
+BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2),,coroutine2)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_DATE_TIME),,date_time)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_EXCEPTION),,exception)
BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_FILESYSTEM),,filesystem)
--
2.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 13:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2 Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 15:08 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-12-11 15:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Vicente Olivert Riera @ 2015-12-11 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
I was trying to test your patch and I have noticed that despite of
having coroutine2 selected...
BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2=y
...there isn't any libboost_coroutine2.so file installed on target. Is
that normal?
Regards,
Vincent.
On 11/12/15 13:57, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Coroutine2 is a new (C++14) library added in boost 1.59.0. We also add
> coroutine2 to the '--without-libraries' configuration flag for the host
> variant.
>
> Build successfully tested with Arago ARMv5 2011.09 - a gcc v4.5.3 toolchain.
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> package/boost/Config.in | 4 ++++
> package/boost/boost.mk | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/boost/Config.in b/package/boost/Config.in
> index 97d0802..83f6871 100644
> --- a/package/boost/Config.in
> +++ b/package/boost/Config.in
> @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE
> bool "boost-coroutine"
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
>
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2
> + bool "boost-coroutine2"
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT
> +
> config BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_DATE_TIME
> bool "boost-date_time"
>
> diff --git a/package/boost/boost.mk b/package/boost/boost.mk
> index 2f23fe1..0161d68 100644
> --- a/package/boost/boost.mk
> +++ b/package/boost/boost.mk
> @@ -16,15 +16,16 @@ HOST_BOOST_DEPENDENCIES =
> # keep host variant as minimal as possible
> HOST_BOOST_FLAGS = --without-icu \
> --without-libraries=$(subst $(space),$(comma),atomic chrono context \
> - coroutine date_time exception filesystem graph graph_parallel \
> - iostreams locale log math mpi program_options python random regex \
> - serialization signals system test thread timer wave)
> + coroutine coroutine2 date_time exception filesystem graph \
> + graph_parallel iostreams locale log math mpi program_options python \
> + random regex serialization signals system test thread timer wave)
>
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_ATOMIC),,atomic)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CHRONO),,chrono)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTAINER),,container)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_CONTEXT),,context)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE),,coroutine)
> +BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2),,coroutine2)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_DATE_TIME),,date_time)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_EXCEPTION),,exception)
> BOOST_WITHOUT_FLAGS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_FILESYSTEM),,filesystem)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 15:08 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
@ 2015-12-11 15:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-11 15:36 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-11 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Vicente,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:08:26 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> I was trying to test your patch and I have noticed that despite of
> having coroutine2 selected...
>
> BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2=y
>
> ...there isn't any libboost_coroutine2.so file installed on target. Is
> that normal?
The vast majority of Boost "libraries" are not libraries in the .so
sense, but purely header based libraries, i.e just a bunch of .h with
very complicated C++ code.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 15:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-12-11 15:36 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-12-11 15:46 ` Jörg Krause
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Vicente Olivert Riera @ 2015-12-11 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Thomas,
On 11/12/15 15:30, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Vicente,
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:08:26 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>
>> I was trying to test your patch and I have noticed that despite of
>> having coroutine2 selected...
>>
>> BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2=y
>>
>> ...there isn't any libboost_coroutine2.so file installed on target. Is
>> that normal?
>
> The vast majority of Boost "libraries" are not libraries in the .so
> sense, but purely header based libraries, i.e just a bunch of .h with
> very complicated C++ code.
But there is a libboost_coroutine.so library, that's why I asked. Is it
expected to have a lib for coroutine and not for coroutine2? That's my
doubt.
Regards,
Vincent.
>
> Thomas
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 15:36 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
@ 2015-12-11 15:46 ` Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 16:00 ` Jörg Krause
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-12-11 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Vicente,
Hi Thomas,
On Fr, 2015-12-11 at 15:36 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 11/12/15 15:30, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Vicente,
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:08:26 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> >
> > > I was trying to test your patch and I have noticed that despite
> > > of
> > > having coroutine2 selected...
> > >
> > > BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_COROUTINE2=y
> > >
> > > ...there isn't any libboost_coroutine2.so file installed on
> > > target. Is
> > > that normal?
> >
> > The vast majority of Boost "libraries" are not libraries in the .so
> > sense, but purely header based libraries, i.e just a bunch of .h
> > with
> > very complicated C++ code.
>
> But there is a libboost_coroutine.so library, that's why I asked. Is
> it
> expected to have a lib for coroutine and not for coroutine2? That's
> my
> doubt.
The Jamfile for coroutine contains:
lib boost_coroutine
????: detail/coroutine_context.cpp
??????exceptions.cpp
??????stack_traits_sources
????: <link>shared:<library>../../context/build//boost_context
??????<link>shared:<library>../../system/build//boost_system
??????<link>shared:<library>../../thread/build//boost_thread
????;
While the Jamfile for coroutine2 contains:
lib boost_coroutine2
????:
????: <link>shared:<library>../../context/build//boost_context
????;
So, coroutine has some sources to link with, while coroutine2 does not.
Also, look at the config.hpp in coroutine2:
#if (defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK) ) && !
defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_STATIC_LINK)
# if defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE)
#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_EXPORT
#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_BUILD_DLL
# else
#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_IMPORT
# endif
#endif
#if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL)
# define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL
#endif
#if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE) && !
defined(BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB) && ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_NO_LIB)
# define BOOST_LIB_NAME boost_coroutine
# if defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK)
#??define BOOST_DYN_LINK
# endif
# include <boost/config/auto_link.hpp>
#endif
For coroutine a library name is defined, for coroutine2 not.
J?rg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 15:46 ` Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 16:00 ` Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 16:18 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-12-11 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Fr, 2015-12-11 at 16:46 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Hi Vicente,
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Also, look at the config.hpp in coroutine2:
>
> ????#if (defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
> ????defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK) ) && !
> ????defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_STATIC_LINK)
> ????# if defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE)
> ????#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_EXPORT
> ????#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_BUILD_DLL
> ????# else
> ????#??define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_IMPORT
> ????# endif
> ????#endif
>
> ????#if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL)
> ????# define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL
> ????#endif
>
> ????#if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE) && !
> ????defined(BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB) && ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_NO_LIB)
> ????# define BOOST_LIB_NAME boost_coroutine
> ????# if defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
> ????defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK)
> ????#??define BOOST_DYN_LINK
> ????# endif
> ????# include <boost/config/auto_link.hpp>
> ????#endif
>
> For coroutine a library name is defined, for coroutine2 not.
Sorry, I got this wrong.
What I really meant is that there would be no library name
boost_coroutine2, but one named boost_coroutine, but only in case it is
built. Since coroutine2 is just a bunch of header files as Thomas
explained, no shared library named boost_coroutine is built at all.
J?rg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2
2015-12-11 16:00 ` Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 16:18 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Vicente Olivert Riera @ 2015-12-11 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
On 11/12/15 16:00, J?rg Krause wrote:
> On Fr, 2015-12-11 at 16:46 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
>> Hi Vicente,
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Also, look at the config.hpp in coroutine2:
>>
>> #if (defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
>> defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK) ) && !
>> defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_STATIC_LINK)
>> # if defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE)
>> # define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_EXPORT
>> # define BOOST_COROUTINES2_BUILD_DLL
>> # else
>> # define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL BOOST_SYMBOL_IMPORT
>> # endif
>> #endif
>>
>> #if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL)
>> # define BOOST_COROUTINES2_DECL
>> #endif
>>
>> #if ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_SOURCE) && !
>> defined(BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB) && ! defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_NO_LIB)
>> # define BOOST_LIB_NAME boost_coroutine
>> # if defined(BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK) ||
>> defined(BOOST_COROUTINES2_DYN_LINK)
>> # define BOOST_DYN_LINK
>> # endif
>> # include <boost/config/auto_link.hpp>
>> #endif
>>
>> For coroutine a library name is defined, for coroutine2 not.
>
> Sorry, I got this wrong.
>
> What I really meant is that there would be no library name
> boost_coroutine2, but one named boost_coroutine, but only in case it is
> built. Since coroutine2 is just a bunch of header files as Thomas
> explained, no shared library named boost_coroutine is built at all.
>
> J?rg
>
understood, thanks for the clarification. Here you have my...
Reviewed-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Tested-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
$ find output/staging/usr/include/boost/coroutine2/ -type f
output/staging/usr/include/boost/coroutine2/detail/pull_coroutine.ipp
output/staging/usr/include/boost/coroutine2/detail/pull_control_block.hpp
output/staging/usr/include/boost/coroutine2/detail/push_control_block.hpp
...
Regards,
Vincent.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0
2015-12-11 13:57 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 13:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/boost: fix space tabs Jörg Krause
2015-12-11 13:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/boost: add library coroutine2 Jörg Krause
@ 2015-12-11 14:45 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-12-12 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-13 21:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Vicente Olivert Riera @ 2015-12-11 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
On 11/12/15 13:57, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Also:
> * remove patch "gcc.jam compiler options fix" - merged upstream
> * renumber patch "fix uclibc eventfd".
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Reviewed-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Tested-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
Build test for MIPS architecture:
$ file output/target/usr/lib/libboost_atomic.so.1.59.0
output/target/usr/lib/libboost_atomic.so.1.59.0: ELF 32-bit LSB shared
object, MIPS, MIPS32 rel2 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
Regards,
Vincent.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0
2015-12-11 13:57 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Jörg Krause
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-12-11 14:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Vicente Olivert Riera
@ 2015-12-12 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-13 21:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-12 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:57:57 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Also:
> * remove patch "gcc.jam compiler options fix" - merged upstream
> * renumber patch "fix uclibc eventfd".
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> ...eventfd.patch => 0002-fix-uclibc-eventfd.patch} | 0
> .../boost/0002-gcc.jam-compiler-options-fix.patch | 37 ----------------------
> package/boost/boost.hash | 6 ++--
> package/boost/boost.mk | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> rename package/boost/{0004-fix-uclibc-eventfd.patch => 0002-fix-uclibc-eventfd.patch} (100%)
> delete mode 100644 package/boost/0002-gcc.jam-compiler-options-fix.patch
All three patches merged, thanks! And thanks to Vicente for the
review/testing.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0
2015-12-11 13:57 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0 Jörg Krause
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-12-12 12:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-12-13 21:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-14 12:31 ` Jörg Krause
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-12-13 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear J?rg Krause,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:57:57 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> Also:
> * remove patch "gcc.jam compiler options fix" - merged upstream
> * renumber patch "fix uclibc eventfd".
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
I am not sure if it is related to the version bump or not, but boost is
causing some build issues:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=boost-1.59.0
Could you have a look ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/boost: bump to version 1.59.0
2015-12-13 21:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-12-14 12:31 ` Jörg Krause
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Krause @ 2015-12-14 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Dear Thomas,
On So, 2015-12-13 at 22:28 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear J?rg Krause,
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:57:57 +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> > Also:
> > * remove patch "gcc.jam compiler options fix" - merged upstream
> > * renumber patch "fix uclibc eventfd".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
>
> I am not sure if it is related to the version bump or not, but boost
> is
> causing some build issues:
>
> ???http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=boost-1.59.0
>
> Could you have a look ?
Actually, I already had two days ago :-)
From [1]:
<fenv.h> exists, but does not define FE_DIVBYZERO and co. Is this true
for all uclibc-based toolchains or is it dependent of the architecture?
[1]?http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-December/146851.h
tml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread