From: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com>,
buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] package/sysdig: bump to version 0.31.4
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:18:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1939790.PYKUYFuaPT@pwmachine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731221843.61feafea@windsurf>
Hi.
Le lundi 31 juillet 2023, 22:18:43 CEST Thomas Petazzoni a écrit :
> Hello Francis (and perhaps Angelo who can help?),
>
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 16:22:10 +0100
>
> Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > - Remove upstream patch as it is no more needed.
>
> Actually I had to remove it from current master, because sysdig was
> bumped to 0.29.3 already, which includes the patch... and so the patch
> in Buildroot doesn't apply anymore.
>
> I tested your version bump, and it fails to build with:
>
> CMake Error at
> /home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/build/falcosecurity-libs-e5c53d648f3c
> 4694385bbe488e7d47eaa36c229a/userspace/libscap/CMakeLists.txt:131
> (add_subdirectory): The binary directory
>
>
> /home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/build/sysdig-0.31.4/buildroot-build/d
> river
>
> is already used to build a source directory. It cannot be used to build
> source directory
>
>
> /home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/build/falcosecurity-libs-e5c53d648f3c
> 4694385bbe488e7d47eaa36c229a/driver
>
> Specify a unique binary directory name.
>
> during the configuration step of sysdig.
>
> Configuration tested:
>
> BR2_arm=y
> BR2_cortex_a9=y
> BR2_ARM_ENABLE_VFP=y
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BOOTLIN=y
> BR2_INIT_NONE=y
> BR2_SYSTEM_BIN_SH_NONE=y
> BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
> BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION=y
> BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION_VALUE="6.1"
> BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_DEFCONFIG="vexpress"
> # BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX is not set
> BR2_PACKAGE_SYSDIG=y
> BR2_PACKAGE_LUA=y
> BR2_PACKAGE_LUA_5_1=y
> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> it would be good to have a runtime test for sysdig in support/testing/,
> as it's not trivial to build, and the autobuilders never caught the
> patching issue.
Good idea! I will check how I can do that!
> > SYSDIG_CONF_OPTS +=
> > -DFALCOSECURITY_LIBS_SOURCE_DIR=$(FALCOSECURITY_LIBS_SRCDIR) \>
> > + -DDRIVER_SOURCE_DIR=$(FALCOSECURITY_LIBS_SRCDIR)/driver \
>
> So apparently something goes wrong with this. Perhaps because
> falcosecurity-libs needs to be bumped first?
As you advised, bumping first the libs then the binary removed the above
problem, thank you!
Regarding this, I am wondering if I should bump both of them in the same
commit, as they are tightly coupled. What do you think?
Note that, I had to make linux-menuconfig to add CONFIG_IPV6, to avoid some
compile errors due to some missing IPv6 related fields while compiling the
kernel module which is parts of the libs.
> > -DVALIJSON_INCLUDE=$(BUILD_DIR)/valijson-0.6/include/valijson \
>
> One thing that is a bit annoying with the packaging here is the fact
> that sysdig needs to look into the source directory of
> falcosecurity-libs and the source tree of valijson. Packages should
> normally not need to access the source/build tree of other packages.
> Not a strict requirement for this version bump, but would be good to
> address on the long run.
>
> By the way
> -DVALIJSON_INCLUDE=$(BUILD_DIR)/valijson-0.6/include/valijson is truly
> horrible, because if valijson gets updated to another version... like
> it has:
>
> VALIJSON_VERSION = 0.7
>
> then this doesn't work anymore.
>
> It needs to be VALIJSON_SRCDIR.
>
> Curious that we can build sysdig today (I verified, it builds) with
> this mistake. Probably means this option is irrelevant.
>
> Could you have a look at all those issues?
I removed everything about VALIJSON and it builds fine.
Glad making it simpler permits to build it!
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-28 15:22 [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Bump sysdig and falco libs Francis Laniel
2023-04-28 15:22 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] package/sysdig: bump to version 0.31.4 Francis Laniel
2023-07-31 20:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-07-31 20:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-08-11 15:18 ` Francis Laniel [this message]
2023-04-28 15:22 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] package/falcosecurity-libs: bump to version 0.10.5 Francis Laniel
2023-07-31 20:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-08-11 15:18 ` Francis Laniel
2023-07-07 14:26 ` [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Bump sysdig and falco libs Francis Laniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1939790.PYKUYFuaPT@pwmachine \
--to=flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox