Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit:	trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:45:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080617154558.GG27792@mx.loc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d4mgkt5l.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:55:34PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
>
>Hi,
>
> >> So they all put libraries / headers in the same staging_dir? Doesn't
> >> that give problems with packages detecting optional stuff at compile
> >> time that might not be available for a specific variant (E.G. one
> >> variant has expat, and another doesn't - Some configure script checks
> >> for expat and finds it in staging_dir even though it isn't going to be
> >> there at runtime).
> >> 
> >> The same with the packages offering different versions.
> >> 
> >> I think a more common setup would be to install the toolchain
> >> somewhere common (/opt/<whatever>) and then have multiple boards using
> >> the same toolchain/c library but potentially different set of
> >> packages(-versions) and their own staging_dir.
>
> Bernhard> If i understand correctly what you are talking about then this is
> Bernhard> exactly the purpose of that PROJECT thing, fwiw.
>
>Me?

no, Hamish.

>    No, the project stuff is (afaik atleast) just about compiling the
>configurable packages under project_build_* instead of build_*, so you
>can reuse a single working directory / staging_dir for multiple
>projects. It has the same drawbacks as what I listed above.
>
>It does sound pretty much what Hamish is doing though.

Exactly.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-17 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16 12:22 [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-06-16 13:54 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-16 14:07   ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-16 15:35     ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-17  4:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-06-17  7:16   ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 10:47     ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-06-17 13:45       ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 14:29         ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-17 14:55           ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 15:45             ` Bernhard Fischer [this message]
2008-06-18  1:18         ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-06-18  5:03           ` [Buildroot] svncommit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain Ulf Samuelsson
2008-06-18  7:36           ` [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-18  1:05       ` Hamish Moffatt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-12 12:54 laird at uclibc.org
2008-11-03 10:37 jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-11-03 10:32 jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-10-17 10:19 jacmet at uclibc.org
2007-07-17  0:18 sjhill at uclibc.org
2007-04-28 17:10 sjhill at uclibc.org
2007-04-19  2:04 sjhill at uclibc.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080617154558.GG27792@mx.loc \
    --to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox