From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:18:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080618011812.GE4283@cloud.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fxrcmazj.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> Hamish> Well I've got one board ("tools", in
> Hamish> local/tools/tools.config) to build the toolchain which I then
> Hamish> use as external toolchain to build several other boards (all
> Hamish> armeb-linux-uclibcgnu). So my toolchain lives in the staging
> Hamish> directory in the same tree.
>
> So they all put libraries / headers in the same staging_dir? Doesn't
Yes.
> that give problems with packages detecting optional stuff at compile
> time that might not be available for a specific variant (E.G. one
> variant has expat, and another doesn't - Some configure script checks
> for expat and finds it in staging_dir even though it isn't going to be
> there at runtime).
Good point. So far all my boards are very similar so this hasn't been a
problem, but that won't always be the case.
IMHO this is a flaw of the project support - everything should be built
into a project-specific directory. Currently only the kernel and busybox
are built in project_build_$arch.
How would everyone react to a patch which redefines BUILD_DIR to match
PROJECT_BUILD_DIR, ie each project would have
project_build_$arch/$project/staging_dir etc?
I think Ulf commented in the past that he doesn't want to waste the time
spent compiling each package for each board separately, but that seems
to be the only way to do it correctly.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 12:22 [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-06-16 13:54 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-16 14:07 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-16 15:35 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-17 4:23 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-06-17 7:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 10:47 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-06-17 13:45 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 14:29 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-17 14:55 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-17 15:45 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-06-18 1:18 ` Hamish Moffatt [this message]
2008-06-18 5:03 ` [Buildroot] svncommit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain Ulf Samuelsson
2008-06-18 7:36 ` [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/toolchain/external-toolchain Peter Korsgaard
2008-06-18 1:05 ` Hamish Moffatt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-12 12:54 laird at uclibc.org
2008-11-03 10:37 jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-11-03 10:32 jacmet at uclibc.org
2008-10-17 10:19 jacmet at uclibc.org
2007-07-17 0:18 sjhill at uclibc.org
2007-04-28 17:10 sjhill at uclibc.org
2007-04-19 2:04 sjhill at uclibc.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080618011812.GE4283@cloud.net.au \
--to=hamish@cloud.net.au \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox