* [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
@ 2008-06-03 12:07 bugs at busybox.net
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugs at busybox.net @ 2008-06-03 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=3594
======================================================================
Reported By: daniellaird
Assigned To: buildroot
======================================================================
Project: buildroot
Issue ID: 3594
Category: Architecture Specific
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 06-03-2008 05:07 PDT
Last Modified: 06-03-2008 05:07 PDT
======================================================================
Summary: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
Description:
ATK does not always require X support to be enabled (DirectFB only for
instance)
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird New Issue
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Status new => assigned
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Assigned To => buildroot
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird File Added: atk_no_x.patch
======================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
@ 2008-07-04 2:24 bugs at busybox.net
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugs at busybox.net @ 2008-07-04 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
======================================================================
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=3594
======================================================================
Reported By: daniellaird
Assigned To: buildroot
======================================================================
Project: buildroot
Issue ID: 3594
Category: Architecture Specific
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: resolved
Resolution: fixed
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 06-03-2008 05:07 PDT
Last Modified: 07-03-2008 19:24 PDT
======================================================================
Summary: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
Description:
ATK does not always require X support to be enabled (DirectFB only for
instance)
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correa - 07-03-08 19:24
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applied and tested (build) on AVR32. Thanks.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird New Issue
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Status new => assigned
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Assigned To => buildroot
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird File Added: atk_no_x.patch
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Status assigned => resolved
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Resolution open => fixed
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Note Added: 0008914
======================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
@ 2008-07-17 10:39 bugs at busybox.net
2008-07-17 14:38 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugs at busybox.net @ 2008-07-17 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
The following issue has been CLOSED
======================================================================
http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=3594
======================================================================
Reported By: daniellaird
Assigned To: buildroot
======================================================================
Project: buildroot
Issue ID: 3594
Category: Architecture Specific
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Fixed in Version:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 06-03-2008 05:07 PDT
Last Modified: 07-17-2008 03:39 PDT
======================================================================
Summary: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
Description:
ATK does not always require X support to be enabled (DirectFB only for
instance)
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correa - 07-03-08 19:24
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applied and tested (build) on AVR32. Thanks.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird New Issue
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Status new => assigned
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Assigned To => buildroot
06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird File Added: atk_no_x.patch
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Status assigned => resolved
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Resolution open => fixed
07-03-08 19:24 Correa Note Added: 0008914
07-16-08 08:02 bernhardf Status resolved => new
07-17-08 03:39 bernhardf Status new => closed
======================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
2008-07-17 10:39 [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled bugs at busybox.net
@ 2008-07-17 14:38 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2008-07-17 15:06 ` Bernhard Fischer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thiago A. Corrêa @ 2008-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, <bugs@busybox.net> wrote:
> Issue History
> Date Modified Username Field Change
> ======================================================================
> 06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird New Issue
> 06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Status new => assigned
> 06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird Assigned To => buildroot
> 06-03-08 05:07 daniellaird File Added: atk_no_x.patch
> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Status assigned => resolved
> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Resolution open => fixed
> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Note Added: 0008914
> 07-16-08 08:02 bernhardf Status resolved => new
> 07-17-08 03:39 bernhardf Status new => closed
> ======================================================================
>
Is there any reason to change the status from Fixed to Closed?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled
2008-07-17 14:38 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
@ 2008-07-17 15:06 ` Bernhard Fischer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Fischer @ 2008-07-17 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:38:14AM -0300, Thiago A. Corr?a wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, <bugs@busybox.net> wrote:
>> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Status assigned => resolved
>> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Resolution open => fixed
>> 07-03-08 19:24 Correa Note Added: 0008914
>> 07-16-08 08:02 bernhardf Status resolved => new
>> 07-17-08 03:39 bernhardf Status new => closed
>> ======================================================================
>>
>
>Is there any reason to change the status from Fixed to Closed?
yes. The convention is to close issues and not to resolve them.
I'm asking anybody to adhere to this. TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-17 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-17 10:39 [Buildroot] [buildroot 0003594]: ATK does not always require X support to be compiled bugs at busybox.net
2008-07-17 14:38 ` Thiago A. Corrêa
2008-07-17 15:06 ` Bernhard Fischer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-04 2:24 bugs at busybox.net
2008-06-03 12:07 bugs at busybox.net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox